Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 47 | 51 | 72 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 67 | 79 | 111 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 95 | 111 | 155 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the Intel Arc B580 presents a mid-range desktop configuration for Lockdown Protocol, a 2024-released FPS title. The measured data shows this combo achieves playable frame rates across all tested resolutions, with the degree of settings flexibility varying significantly depending on the target resolution. The CPU sits in the 90th percentile of all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile, indicating a capable but not top-tier pairing for this specific game's engine.
FAQ
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1920x1080 that stays above 60 FPS?
A: The Ultra preset is playable at 1080p, with an average frame rate of 72.8 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold at this resolution.
Q: Can this combo handle 2560x1440 at High settings?
A: Yes. The High preset at 1440p yields an average of 67.2 FPS, which is above the playable threshold of 60 FPS. This is the best visual preset that remains playable at this resolution.
Q: What is the only playable setting at 4K (3840x2160) resolution?
A: Only the Low preset achieves a playable frame rate at 4K, averaging 71.9 FPS. The Medium preset falls to 51.1 FPS, and High drops further to 47.2 FPS, both below the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 2080 in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Intel Arc B580 is 0.6% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 in average benchmark score, with the Arc scoring 23021 against the RTX 2080's 22895. The performance delta is minimal, indicating near-identical synthetic performance.
Q: Is the Core i5-14600K significantly faster than the Core Ultra 5 245?
A: The i5-14600K has an average benchmark score of 48618, which is 0.8% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245's 48995. The performance difference is negligible, with the i5-14600K trailing by less than one percent.
Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1440p with Medium settings?
A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 delivers an average of 78.5 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a significant headroom over the High preset's 67.2 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the benchmark database of tested hardware combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this specific configuration of the Intel Core i5-14600K and Intel Arc B580 holds the 2834th position out of 3714 tested combos. This places the pairing in the lower-middle portion of the ranking distribution, roughly in the 24th percentile of all tested systems. The rank reflects the Arc B580's modest standing among GPUs, as the CPU's 90th percentile ranking suggests it is not the limiting factor in most scenarios.
The combination's rank is influenced by the GPU's 68th percentile standing among all tested graphics cards. While the CPU is a high performer, the Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23021 places it near the performance level of the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which scores 23061 and shows a -0.2% delta. This suggests the GPU is the primary determinant of the combo's overall rank in this game, as the engine's demands scale more heavily with graphics processing power than with the CPU's multicore capabilities.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS average is Ultra, which delivers 72.8 FPS. This leaves a 12.8 FPS margin over the playability threshold, indicating that the Ultra preset is not only playable but also offers some headroom for scene complexity spikes. The High preset at this resolution reaches 94.9 FPS, and Medium achieves 110.9 FPS, while Low peaks at 154.5 FPS, showing a clear scaling pattern.
For 2560x1440, the best quality preset that stays above 60 FPS is High, averaging 67.2 FPS. The Medium preset at this resolution provides 78.5 FPS, offering a more comfortable margin with a moderate visual quality reduction. The Ultra preset drops to 50.1 FPS, making it unplayable by the 60 FPS standard, while Low delivers 111.4 FPS for maximum performance.
At 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 71.9 FPS. This is the sole playable option at 4K, as Medium falls to 51.1 FPS and High drops to 47.2 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the least viable option, producing just 33.6 FPS. The data shows a steep performance cliff between Low and Medium at this resolution, suggesting the GPU's memory bandwidth or compute resources become saturated quickly as settings increase.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-14600K's nearest performance rivals include the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, which scores 48698 and is 0.2% faster, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX, which scores 48287 and is 0.7% slower. The AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48470, placing it 0.3% behind the i5-14600K. These processors would behave nearly identically in Lockdown Protocol, as their benchmark deltas are within one percent, meaning any of these alternatives would yield similar frame rates when paired with the Arc B580.
On the GPU side, the Arc B580's closest competitors are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (0.2% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (0.6% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (0.7% faster), and the NVIDIA P106-100 (1.0% faster). The RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 are particularly relevant comparisons, as their presence in the nearest rivals list indicates that the Arc B580 performs in the same tier as these older high-end cards. Users considering upgrades or replacements would see essentially the same frame rates in Lockdown Protocol from any of these GPUs when paired with the i5-14600K.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals that the GPU is the dominant performance factor in Lockdown Protocol at higher resolutions. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings reduces the average frame rate from 94.9 FPS to 67.2 FPS, a 27.7 FPS drop. Scaling further to 3840x2160 at High settings brings the average down to 47.2 FPS, a 20.0 FPS drop from 1440p. This progressive degradation with increasing pixel count indicates that the Arc B580's rendering throughput is the primary constraint, as the CPU's workload does not scale with resolution.
However, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and higher frame rates. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 154.5 FPS, which approaches the practical ceiling for many game engines. At this point, the Core i5-14600K's 14 cores and 20 threads provide sufficient processing power to feed the GPU, but the frame rate gains from 1440p Low (111.4 FPS) to 1080p Low (154.5 FPS) show that the GPU still has headroom when the resolution drops. The 43.1 FPS increase from 1440p to 1080p at Low settings suggests the GPU is still the bottleneck, as a CPU-bound scenario would show smaller gains.
The gap between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution further confirms the GPU's dominance. At 1080p, the difference between Low (154.5 FPS) and Ultra (72.8 FPS) is 81.7 FPS, a 53% reduction in performance for maximum visual quality. At 1440p, this gap shrinks to 61.3 FPS (from 111.4 to 50.1), and at 4K it narrows to 38.3 FPS (from 71.9 to 33.6). This pattern indicates that as resolution increases, the absolute frame rate ceiling drops, but the relative cost of enabling Ultra settings remains consistent, pointing to the GPU's raw processing capability as the limiting factor across all settings levels.
The Verdict
This PC configuration can run Lockdown Protocol, but the ease of doing so depends entirely on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with every preset from Low to Ultra maintaining average frame rates above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset at 72.8 FPS is the recommended choice for this resolution, as it provides the best visual quality without sacrificing playability.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable but with reduced options. The High preset at 67.2 FPS is the best quality setting that clears the 60 FPS threshold, while Medium at 78.5 FPS offers a more substantial performance buffer. The Ultra preset falls below the threshold at 50.1 FPS, so users at this resolution should avoid maximum settings.
At 3840x2160, the system is only marginally playable, with the Low preset at 71.9 FPS being the sole option. Users attempting 4K will need to accept significantly reduced visual quality to maintain playable frame rates. Overall, the verdict is positive for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but 4K users will face severe settings limitations with this hardware combination.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the average frame rates scale from 154.5 FPS on Low to 110.9 FPS on Medium, 94.9 FPS on High, and 72.8 FPS on Ultra. The frame rate differences between consecutive settings are 43.6 FPS between Low and Medium, 16.0 FPS between Medium and High, and 22.1 FPS between High and Ultra. The relative consistency of these drops suggests the GPU's compute units are the primary constraint, with each settings tier adding a measurable workload increase.
For 2560x1440, the measured averages are 111.4 FPS on Low, 78.5 FPS on Medium, 67.2 FPS on High, and 50.1 FPS on Ultra. The transition from Low to Medium represents a 32.9 FPS drop, while Medium to High costs 11.3 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 17.1 FPS. The Ultra setting at this resolution falls below the playable threshold, indicating that the Arc B580's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus, while sufficient for lower presets, cannot sustain the full feature set at 1440p.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates are 71.9 FPS on Low, 51.1 FPS on Medium, 47.2 FPS on High, and 33.6 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Medium is 20.8 FPS, while Medium to High costs only 3.9 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 13.6 FPS. The relatively small difference between Medium and High at 4K suggests that these settings impose similar rendering loads, whereas Ultra introduces a disproportionately large performance penalty. Across all resolutions, the data shows that the Arc B580's performance degrades predictably with resolution and settings, with the 4K Ultra preset representing the worst-case scenario at 33.6 FPS.