Lockdown Protocol

The Intel Core i5-14600K and Intel Arc B570 combination occupies a specific performance tier for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the 2987th position out of 3714 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle range of the benchmark database, indicating that while it can run the game, many other configurations deliver higher frame rates. The data shows a processor that ranks in the 90th percentile against all CPUs, paired with a graphics card in the 65th percentile against all GPUs, creating a system where the GPU is the primary constraint in this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Intel Core i5-14600K's average benchmark score of 48618 is remarkably close to several other processors. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698, a difference of only -0.2 percent, meaning these two chips deliver virtually identical compute performance. The AMD EPYC 4345P trails by a negligible 0.3 percent with a score of 48470. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287, sitting 0.7 percent behind, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 posts 48995, which is 0.8 percent ahead. For Lockdown Protocol, swapping the i5-14600K for any of these four chips would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates, as the differences fall well within run-to-run variance.

On the graphics side, the Intel Arc B570's average score of 20556 aligns closely with three other GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, a delta of just 0.1 percent, making it a direct performance equivalent. The Intel Arc A750 is essentially a tie at 20582, sitting 0.1 percent behind the B570. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480 (0.4 percent slower) and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X reaches 20662 (0.5 percent faster). In practice, a system built with the i5-14600K plus any of these four GPUs would land within a few frames per second of the B570 configuration at every resolution and preset tested.

The practical takeaway is that this combo behaves like a mid-range 1080p and entry-level 1440p setup. The CPU has substantial headroom — its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 and single-core score of 2064 indicate strong processing power — but the GPU's 10 GB GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth limits how much of that CPU potential can be realized at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings. The measured average at 3840x2160 on Low is 64 FPS. Medium settings drop to 46 FPS average (with a minimum of 39 and maximum of 52), High runs at 40 FPS, and Ultra falls to 30 FPS — none of which clear the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming with this hardware?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce a 62 FPS average, which is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. The data also shows Low at 100 FPS and Medium at 71 FPS, but High delivers the best visual quality while remaining playable.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to the previous generation Arc A750?

A: The two GPUs are nearly identical in overall benchmark performance. The Arc B570 scores 20556 while the Arc A750 scores 20582, a difference of only -0.1 percent. In Lockdown Protocol, you would expect the same frame rates from either card within measurement error.

Q: Is the Core i5-14600K holding back the Arc B570 in this game?

A: The benchmark data does not indicate CPU limitation. The processor ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs and its nearest rivals — including server-class Xeon and EPYC parts — differ by less than 1 percent in average score. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking and the frame rate scaling across resolutions point to the graphics card as the performance ceiling.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: The average is 63 FPS at 1920x1080 on Ultra, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is the only resolution where Ultra settings are viable for this combination.

Q: Does the Arc B570 support modern graphics APIs needed for this FPS title?

A: Yes. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. This covers the API requirements for contemporary FPS games, including Lockdown Protocol which released on 2024-03-11.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data covers four settings presets across three resolutions, with min/max values recorded only for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the combination delivers its strongest performance. Low settings produce a 136 FPS average. The Medium preset averages 96 FPS with a minimum of 82 and maximum of 111, showing consistent frame pacing. High settings reduce the average to 84 FPS. Ultra remains playable at 63 FPS average, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales down as expected. Low settings still deliver a smooth 100 FPS average. The Medium preset averages 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 and maximum of 81 — the minimum exactly meets the playable threshold, indicating occasional dips to the boundary. High settings average 62 FPS, keeping the game playable but with less headroom. Ultra drops to a 46 FPS average, which falls short of the 60 FPS target.

At 3840x2160, only the Low preset remains viable. The Low settings average 64 FPS, narrowly clearing the threshold. Medium averages 46 FPS with a minimum of 39 and maximum of 52, showing significant frame variance. High settings average 40 FPS. Ultra is the weakest result at 30 FPS, representing the most demanding configuration tested. The pattern across resolutions shows a steep performance cliff between Low and Medium at 4K, while the gap between Medium and High is smaller.

The frame time data for Medium settings reveals how the system handles stress. At 1080p, the 82-to-111 range spans 29 FPS, indicating moderate variance. At 1440p, the 60-to-81 range spans 21 FPS with the floor exactly at the playable limit. At 4K, the 39-to-52 range spans 13 FPS — the tightest range but at an unplayable level.

How This Combo Ranks

This configuration ranks 2987th out of 3714 tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the 19.6th percentile of all tested systems. The rank reflects the Arc B570's position as the limiting factor: the GPU sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The discrepancy between these two percentile positions explains why the combo ranks lower than the CPU's standing would suggest — the graphics card cannot fully utilize the processor's capability at higher settings.

The rank distribution implies that roughly 727 tested combos perform worse than this configuration, while 2986 perform better. For a CPU released on 2023-10-16 and a GPU released on 2025-01-15, this represents a mid-pack result for a modern pairing. The i5-14600K's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample processing power, but the Arc B570's 2304 shading units and 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance position it as a capable but not top-tier graphics solution.

The Verdict

The verdict data is clear: this PC can run Lockdown Protocol with playable frame rates at every tested resolution, provided the settings are chosen appropriately. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — exceed 60 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 63 FPS, making 1080p the only resolution where maximum visual quality is achievable.

At 2560x1440, three presets are playable: Low (100 FPS), Medium (71 FPS), and High (62 FPS). The Ultra preset at 46 FPS falls below the threshold. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears 60 FPS with a 64 FPS average. The gap between playable and unplayable at 4K is substantial — Medium drops to 46 FPS, a 28 percent reduction from Low.

The system's playability profile is consistent with a GPU that has 10 GB of memory and a 160-bit bus. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for lower presets but becomes a bottleneck as texture and shading complexity increase. For the best experience, 1080p with High or Ultra settings provides a strong balance, while 1440p users should stick to High or below.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 63 FPS. This is the recommended configuration for 1080p displays, as it delivers the full visual experience while keeping frame rates above the playable threshold. The next step down, High at 84 FPS, offers more headroom for demanding scenes but sacrifices some visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, averaging 62 FPS. This provides a modest margin above the 60 FPS target. Users seeking higher frame rates can select Medium at 71 FPS or Low at 100 FPS, but High represents the optimal balance of image quality and performance. The Medium preset's minimum of 60 FPS suggests that heavy scenes could cause brief dips to the threshold.

At 3840x2160, the only playable option is Low, with a 64 FPS average. This is the recommended setting for 4K displays. The margin above 60 FPS is thin, so users may experience occasional drops below the threshold in intense combat sequences. Medium at 46 FPS and High at 40 FPS are not viable for smooth gameplay at this resolution, and Ultra at 30 FPS is effectively a slideshow.

The pattern across resolutions shows diminishing returns as settings increase: at 1080p, the jump from High to Ultra costs 21 FPS; at 1440p, the jump from High to Ultra costs 16 FPS; at 4K, the jump from Low to Medium costs 18 FPS. This system is best suited to 1080p gaming with high-to-ultra settings, with 1440p High as a viable alternative for users with higher-resolution monitors.