Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

77%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
158 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
76 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
114 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
55 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
72 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
35 FPS
10.2ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 48,618
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 16,361

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 45 50 72
1440p QHD 55 68 80 114
1080p Full HD 76 98 112 158

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 98
1920x1080 Low 158
1920x1080 Medium 112
1920x1080 Ultra 76
2560x1440 High 68
2560x1440 Low 114
2560x1440 Medium 80
2560x1440 Ultra 55
3840x2160 High 45
3840x2160 Low 72
3840x2160 Medium 50
3840x2160 Ultra 35

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Intel Core i5-14600K and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is a pairing of a high-end 14th Gen processor with a previous-generation mid-range graphics card. The recorded data for Lockdown Protocol shows a system that is strongly capable at standard resolutions, but the demands of 4K Ultra prove too heavy for the GPU. The measurements reveal a clear pattern where the RX 5700 XT becomes the limiting factor as resolution climbs, while the i5-14600K provides ample headroom for the game's logic and physics.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database contains average FPS measurements for twelve combinations of resolution and preset, with no minimum or maximum frame data recorded. At 1920x1080, the system delivers strong performance across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 158.2 FPS, Medium reaches 112.3 FPS, and High achieves 97.6 FPS. Ultra settings at 1080p still maintain an average of 75.7 FPS, which remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages scale down but remain playable for most settings. Low settings run at 114.2 FPS, Medium at 79.7 FPS, and High at 68.4 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 55.3 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold. This is the first configuration where the system fails to hold 60 FPS, indicating that the RX 5700 XT cannot sustain the highest visual quality at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens considerably. Low settings still manage an average of 71.5 FPS, which is playable. Medium drops to 50.4 FPS, High falls to 44.9 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 35.2 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 36.3 FPS, a substantial spread that demonstrates how much the preset selection matters at this resolution.

The data shows consistent behavior across resolutions: Low is always the fastest, followed by Medium, then High, with Ultra being the slowest. The relative differences between presets grow as resolution increases. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra is 82.5 FPS. At 1440p, that gap narrows to 58.9 FPS. At 4K, the gap is 36.3 FPS. This pattern suggests that the GPU is becoming increasingly saturated at higher resolutions, so the absolute frame rate differences between presets compress even though the percentage differences remain significant.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database identifies the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS for each resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears the threshold at every preset, but the best setting is Ultra with an average of 75.7 FPS. This leaves a margin of 15.7 FPS above the playable threshold, meaning 1080p Ultra is not merely playable but has some headroom for frame drops.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High with an average of 68.4 FPS. This is a modest margin of 8.4 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium runs faster at 79.7 FPS and Low runs at 114.2 FPS, but the database selects High as the optimal choice because it offers the highest visual quality while still maintaining playability. Ultra at 55.3 FPS misses the threshold by 4.7 FPS, so it is not recommended.

At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low with an average of 71.5 FPS. The margin here is 11.5 FPS, which is reasonable but not generous. Medium at 50.4 FPS, High at 44.9 FPS, and Ultra at 35.2 FPS all fall short of the 60 FPS target. For 4K users, Low is the sole viable option in the recorded data, and even that setting does not leave a large safety buffer.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Core i5-14600K and the RX 5700 XT becomes clear when examining how frame rates scale with resolution. At 1080p, the system produces very high frame rates across all presets, including 158.2 FPS on Low. These numbers indicate that the GPU has enough headroom at this resolution to render frames quickly, while the CPU's strong single-threaded performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2491 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2064, keeps the game logic fed without becoming a bottleneck.

As resolution increases to 1440p and then 4K, the average FPS drops proportionally for each preset. The pattern is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario: the render workload per frame increases with pixel count, and the RX 5700 XT's fixed compute resources must work harder. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 16277 and its 9.754 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are modest by current standards, and the data suggests that this compute capacity is the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

The CPU's role is more apparent at lower resolutions and lower presets. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 158.2 FPS, which is a demanding frame rate that requires both strong GPU throughput and CPU processing speed. The i5-14600K's 14 cores and 20 threads, along with a PassMark multithread score of 38682, provide ample processing power for the game's simulation and networking tasks. However, the scaling between presets at each resolution shows that the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences. Going from Low to Ultra at 1080p reduces the average from 158.2 FPS to 75.7 FPS, a drop of 82.5 FPS, which reflects the increasing pixel shading and texture work demanded by higher presets rather than any CPU limitation.

The resolution scaling tells the same story. At High settings, the average FPS goes from 97.6 at 1080p to 68.4 at 1440p to 44.9 at 4K. This is a classic GPU-bound curve. The CPU's performance does not change with resolution, so the frame rate decline is attributable to the GPU's rendering load. The i5-14600K is clearly not the constraint in this system for Lockdown Protocol; the RX 5700 XT determines the ceiling at each resolution and preset.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database provides nearest rival comparisons for both the CPU and GPU based on average benchmark scores. For the Intel Core i5-14600K, which has an average benchmark score of 48618 and sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, the closest alternatives are all within a narrow band. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48470, 0.3% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287, 0.7% lower, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, 0.8% higher. These four processors would behave nearly identically to the i5-14600K in Lockdown Protocol, since their aggregate benchmark performance is effectively the same.

For the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, the average benchmark score is 16361, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are similarly close. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351, just 0.1% lower. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408, 0.3% higher. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415, 0.3% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504, 0.9% higher. Any of these GPUs would produce frame rates within a rounding error of the RX 5700 XT in this game, which means the measured FPS values for Lockdown Protocol would be nearly identical with these alternatives installed.

These rival comparisons highlight an interesting quirk of the benchmark database: the nearest scoring neighbors are not necessarily similar in architecture or market position. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and RTX 5090 D V2 are far more modern and expensive GPUs, yet their aggregate benchmark scores land close to the RX 5700 XT. This suggests that for this particular game, the raw rendering workload is what matters, and the RX 5700 XT's measured performance is representative of a specific performance tier regardless of which specific GPU occupies that tier.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The recorded average FPS for 1920x1080 Ultra is 75.7, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: High settings at 1440p produce an average of 68.4 FPS, which is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at this resolution.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: Only at Low settings. The 3840x2160 Low preset averages 71.5 FPS, while Medium, High, and Ultra average 50.4, 44.9, and 35.2 FPS respectively, all below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Which component limits performance in this game?

A: The GPU. Frame rates decline consistently as resolution increases, and the gap between Low and Ultra presets narrows at higher resolutions, indicating that the RX 5700 XT's rendering capacity is the bottleneck rather than the i5-14600K.

Q: How does the i5-14600K compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H is 0.2% faster, the AMD EPYC 4345P is 0.3% slower, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX is 0.7% slower, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.8% faster. All are effectively equivalent for this game.

Q: What GPU alternatives would perform similarly?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M is 0.1% slower, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 0.3% faster, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is 0.3% faster, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is 0.9% faster. Any of these would produce nearly identical frame rates.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Lockdown Protocol depends entirely on the target resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the system runs every preset above 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 75.7 FPS. This is the best case for the hardware, offering full visual quality with a comfortable frame rate margin. At 2560x1440, the system remains playable at High settings with 68.4 FPS, but Ultra falls short at 55.3 FPS. Users who prioritize smoothness over visual fidelity can use Medium at 79.7 FPS or Low at 114.2 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system is limited to Low settings, which average 71.5 FPS. This is technically playable, but the visual compromise is significant. Medium, High, and Ultra all fail to reach the 60 FPS threshold, with averages of 50.4, 44.9, and 35.2 FPS respectively. The verdict from the database is clear: this combo runs the game at 1080p Ultra, 1440p High, and 4K Low. The playable settings list for each resolution confirms this, with 1080p allowing all four presets, 1440p allowing High, Medium, and Low, and 4K allowing only Low.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, the Intel Core i5-14600K and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT pair ranks 2744 out of 3714 total combos. This places the system in the lower portion of the ranking, which is consistent with the GPU's 59th percentile standing among all GPUs. The CPU is far more powerful, sitting in the 90th percentile, but the overall combo rank reflects the fact that the GPU holds the system back in this game.

The rank of 2744 out of 3714 means that a majority of tested combinations deliver better performance in Lockdown Protocol. This is not surprising given the RX 5700 XT's age and mid-range positioning, but the data also shows that the system is far from unusable. The 1080p results are strong, and even 1440p is viable at High settings. The rank is a holistic measure across all tested resolutions and presets, and the system's inability to handle 4K Ultra drags its standing down despite solid performance at lower resolutions. For a user targeting 1080p or 1440p gaming, the rank undersells the practical experience, but for 4K enthusiasts, the ranking accurately reflects the hardware's limitations.