Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

43%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
113 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
54 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
85 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
38 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
53 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
23 FPS
14.3ms Frame Time
21ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 32,279
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 0

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Available

Your GPU supports ray tracing but may impact FPS.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 23 34 36 53
1440p QHD 38 51 60 85
1080p Full HD 54 70 82 113

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 70
1920x1080 Low 113
1920x1080 Medium 82
1920x1080 Ultra 54
2560x1440 High 51
2560x1440 Low 85
2560x1440 Medium 60
2560x1440 Ultra 38
3840x2160 High 34
3840x2160 Low 53
3840x2160 Medium 36
3840x2160 Ultra 23

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The benchmark data for Lockdown Protocol with the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB reveals a system that is highly resolution-dependent. The combo delivers smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p with adjusted settings, but it is not capable of maintaining 60 FPS at 4K under any tested preset. The analysis below breaks down the measured performance, component roles, and comparative standing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this system covers three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a clear picture of its scaling behavior. All figures are average FPS, as minimum and maximum frame data were not recorded.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the system struggles across the board. The Low preset delivers an average of 52.6 FPS, which is the only 4K result above 50 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 35.8 FPS, while High yields 33.6 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, producing just 23.1 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is substantial, with Ultra delivering roughly 56% lower performance than Low. None of these results approach the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 2560x1440 (QHD), the system finds a workable middle ground. The Low preset reaches 84.7 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The Medium preset hits exactly 60.1 FPS, which is technically playable but leaves no headroom for frame drops. High falls to 50.8 FPS, and Ultra drops further to 37.7 FPS. The transition from Low to Medium costs roughly 24 FPS, while the jump to Ultra nearly halves the Low preset's performance.

At 1920x1080 (FHD), the system performs best. The Low preset achieves 113.1 FPS, which is a strong result for competitive play. Medium delivers 81.8 FPS, and High manages 70.3 FPS — all three comfortably clear the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset, however, falls short at 53.5 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a consistent decline, with each higher preset costing approximately 15-20 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU's capabilities become more relevant as resolution drops. The Intel Core i5-14400F, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, provides sufficient compute headroom for this title. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 and single-core score of 3,055 suggest strong general processing power.

At 4K, the GPU's limitations are evident. The RTX 3050 4 GB, with 2,048 shading units and 192.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, struggles to push frames. The drop from Low (52.6 FPS) to Medium (35.8 FPS) at 4K is a 32% reduction, indicating that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are saturated. The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus is likely a constraint at this resolution, given the higher texture and geometry demands.

At 1440p, the balance shifts. The Low preset (84.7 FPS) and Medium preset (60.1 FPS) show that the GPU can handle moderate loads, but the CPU begins to influence results. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration of the i5-14400F helps maintain frame pacing, as evidenced by the more gradual scaling between presets compared to 4K.

At 1080p, the CPU's role becomes more prominent. The Low preset's 113.1 FPS suggests that the system is no longer purely GPU-bound; the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,055) and multi-thread capability allow the GPU to work closer to its full potential. The fact that Ultra still produces 53.5 FPS shows that the GPU remains the final limiter, but the CPU is not holding it back significantly at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB ranks at 3,254 out of 3,714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the lower portion of the database, specifically around the 12th percentile of all tested configurations. The rank reflects the GPU's modest performance ceiling, as the RTX 3050 4 GB sits at the 50th percentile among all tested GPUs.

The CPU, by contrast, is a stronger component. The i5-14400F ranks at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32,279. This mismatch — a high-performing CPU paired with a mid-tier GPU — explains why the combo's overall rank is lower than the CPU's individual standing. The data suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in most scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-14400F provide context for what other CPUs would behave similarly in this system. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has an average score of 32,233, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-14400F. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32,226, 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32,354, which is 0.2% lower, and the Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32,121, 0.5% lower. These delta percentages are tiny, indicating that swapping the i5-14400F for any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, as the GPU would remain the bottleneck.

The RTX 3050 4 GB has no listed nearest rivals in the fact pack, so direct GPU comparisons are not available from the data. However, the GPU's 50th percentile standing among all GPUs suggests that it performs in the middle of the pack. Given the 4 GB memory limit and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth, users should expect similar performance from other GPUs in that percentile range, though exact scores are not provided.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 1080p with High settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 70.3 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Is 4K playable with any settings on this combo?

A: No. The best 4K result is 52.6 FPS on Low settings, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. All other 4K presets produce lower averages, ranging from 23.1 FPS (Ultra) to 35.8 FPS (Medium).

Q: What is the highest setting that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 averages 60.1 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays at or above the playable threshold.

Q: How much performance do you gain by dropping from Ultra to Low at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 113.1 FPS, while Ultra averages 53.5 FPS. This represents a 59.6 FPS gain, or roughly 2.1 times the performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more responsible for the 4K performance shortfall?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K. The RTX 3050 4 GB's modest memory bandwidth (192.0 GB/s) and 4 GB VRAM capacity limit its ability to handle 4K workloads, as evidenced by the large FPS drops when increasing settings.

Q: Does the i5-14400F hold back the RTX 3050 4 GB at 1080p?

A: The data suggests not. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 113.1 FPS, which is a strong result. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it has ample headroom, while the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it is the limiting factor.

The Verdict

Based on the measured FPS data, this PC can run Lockdown Protocol at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K. At 1920x1080, three presets clear the 60 FPS threshold: Low (113.1 FPS), Medium (81.8 FPS), and High (70.3 FPS). The Ultra preset falls short at 53.5 FPS. At 2560x1440, the Low preset (84.7 FPS) and Medium preset (60.1 FPS) are playable, while High (50.8 FPS) and Ultra (37.7 FPS) are not. At 3840x2160, no settings achieve 60 FPS, with Low being the best at 52.6 FPS.

The verdict by resolution confirms this: 4K has no playable settings, 1440p supports Low and Medium, and 1080p supports High, Low, and Medium. For users prioritizing smooth gameplay, 1080p High is the most demanding preset that delivers a stable 60+ FPS experience.

Best Settings per Resolution

  • 3840x2160: No preset achieves 60 FPS. The best result is Low at 52.6 FPS, but it does not meet the playable threshold.
  • 2560x1440: The most demanding playable preset is Medium, averaging 60.1 FPS. Low is also playable at 84.7 FPS, but Medium offers better visual quality while staying at the threshold.
  • 1920x1080: The most demanding playable preset is High, averaging 70.3 FPS. Medium (81.8 FPS) and Low (113.1 FPS) are also viable, but High provides the best visual fidelity without dropping below 60 FPS.

For users who prioritize frame rate over visuals, 1080p Low at 113.1 FPS is the strongest option. For a balance of quality and performance, 1080p High at 70.3 FPS is recommended. At 1440p, Medium at 60.1 FPS is the limit of this system's capabilities.