Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

84%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
286 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
135 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
212 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
99 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
137 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
64 FPS
5.6ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 25,292
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 43,223

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 64 85 97 137
1440p QHD 99 132 151 212
1080p Full HD 135 180 206 286

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 180
1920x1080 Low 286
1920x1080 Medium 206
1920x1080 Ultra 135
2560x1440 High 132
2560x1440 Low 212
2560x1440 Medium 151
2560x1440 Ultra 99
3840x2160 High 85
3840x2160 Low 137
3840x2160 Medium 97
3840x2160 Ultra 64

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination is a potent pairing for Lockdown Protocol, with measured data showing this system ranks 604th out of 3714 tested combinations. The CPU holds a percentile rank of 77 among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a well-balanced setup where neither component is likely to be a severe bottleneck at the game's most demanding settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the Intel Core i5-13400F, the benchmark data reveals a tight cluster of rivals with nearly identical average scores. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS posts an average score of 25284, representing a 0% delta from the i5-13400F's performance. The Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D both deliver average scores of 25362 and 25365 respectively, each sitting just 0.3% behind the i5-13400F. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H rounds out the group with a score of 25201, a 0.4% advantage. In practice, any of these processors would deliver virtually indistinguishable frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, making them credible substitutes if the i5-13400F is unavailable.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rivals are all NVIDIA products with remarkably small performance deltas. The Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262, just 0.1% behind the RTX 4070 SUPER's average of 43223. The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile matches that 0.1% deficit with a score of 43268, while the Quadro M6000 trails by 0.2% at 43301. The RTX 4090 Mobile is the closest competitor, posting 43667 for a 1% advantage. For Lockdown Protocol, users with any of these GPUs should expect similar behavior at the same settings, though the RTX 4070 SUPER's desktop-oriented feature set makes it the more practical choice for a stationary gaming rig.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals how the workload shifts between the i5-13400F and RTX 4070 SUPER as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 286 FPS on Low settings and 206 FPS on Medium, suggesting the GPU has ample headroom and the CPU is driving performance. The jump from Low to Medium costs 80 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High costs 26 FPS, indicating that settings changes have a large impact at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop to 212 FPS on Low and 151 FPS on Medium, representing a 26% reduction from 1080p at both settings. This scaling suggests the GPU is beginning to take on more responsibility, but the CPU remains capable of feeding it adequately. At 3840x2160, the Low setting yields 137 FPS and Medium yields 97 FPS, a further 35% and 36% reduction respectively from 1440p. The pattern across resolutions shows the RTX 4070 SUPER becoming the primary performance limiter at 4K, while the i5-13400F maintains sufficient throughput to avoid becoming a bottleneck even at lower resolutions.

The Ultra preset tells a similar story. At 1080p, the system hits 135 FPS; at 1440p, it drops to 99 FPS; and at 4K, it falls to 64 FPS. The consistent 25-35% performance loss per resolution step confirms that GPU load scales predictably with pixel count, while the CPU's 16 threads handle the game's simulation and physics consistently across all three resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 286 FPS, while Medium settings yield 206 FPS with a minimum of 175 FPS and a maximum of 237 FPS. High settings drop to 180 FPS, and Ultra settings maintain 135 FPS. All presets at this resolution clear the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin, with even the most demanding Ultra preset nearly doubling the threshold.

The 2560x1440 results show strong performance with more headroom above the 60 FPS floor. Low settings average 212 FPS, Medium settings average 151 FPS with a minimum of 128 FPS and maximum of 173 FPS, High settings reach 132 FPS, and Ultra settings hold at 99 FPS. The minimum FPS recorded at Medium settings remains well above 60, indicating smooth frame pacing.

At 3840x2160, the system remains playable across all presets but with less margin. Low settings produce 137 FPS, Medium settings average 97 FPS with a minimum of 83 FPS and maximum of 112 FPS, High settings drop to 85 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 64 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K sits just 4 FPS above the playable threshold, making it the only configuration in the entire dataset where the system approaches the 60 FPS limit.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol at all tested resolutions and presets, with every configuration clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 1920x1080, the system handles even Ultra settings with 135 FPS average, providing a highly responsive experience for fast-paced FPS gameplay. The 2560x1440 resolution offers an excellent balance, with Ultra settings delivering 99 FPS and Medium settings reaching 151 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system remains fully playable but with less headroom. Ultra settings produce 64 FPS, which clears the threshold but leaves little room for demanding scenes. High settings provide a more comfortable 85 FPS, while Medium settings offer 97 FPS. For users prioritizing smoothness at 4K, High settings represent the safer choice, while Ultra is viable for those who accept occasional dips near 60 FPS.

The data indicates that the RTX 4070 SUPER is the decisive component at 4K, where Ultra settings push the GPU to its limits. At 1440p and below, the i5-13400F's strong single-thread and multi-thread performance keeps the system well above the playable threshold regardless of preset.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest FPS achievable with this system in Lockdown Protocol?

A: The maximum recorded average FPS is 286, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The minimum average FPS is 64, recorded at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 64 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. However, it is the closest margin in the dataset, and users should expect limited headroom for demanding scenes.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F's average benchmark score of 25292 is within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H and within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS matches it exactly with a 0% delta.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 SUPER significantly faster than its nearest GPU rivals?

A: No, the RTX 4070 SUPER's average benchmark score of 43223 is within 1% of all its nearest rivals. The closest competitor, the RTX 4090 Mobile, is just 1% faster, while the Quadro M6000 24 GB is 0.1% slower.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: At 2560x1440, Ultra settings are fully playable at 99 FPS average, making it the best preset available. Medium settings provide 151 FPS if higher frame rates are preferred.

Q: Does the system meet the 60 FPS threshold at all resolutions?

A: Yes, every tested configuration at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 exceeds 60 FPS. The lowest recorded average is 64 FPS at 4K Ultra, which still clears the threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 135 FPS. This provides excellent visual quality with substantial performance headroom. Low settings reach 286 FPS, Medium 206 FPS, and High 180 FPS, but Ultra offers the best visual fidelity while remaining far above the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings are again the best choice, delivering 99 FPS average. This configuration offers a strong balance of visual quality and performance, with enough margin above 60 FPS to handle most in-game scenarios. Medium settings reach 151 FPS for users who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity.

At 3840x2160, Ultra settings achieve 64 FPS, which technically clears the 60 FPS threshold but leaves minimal headroom. High settings provide a more comfortable 85 FPS average and are recommended for users who value consistent frame pacing. Medium settings deliver 97 FPS and Low settings reach 137 FPS, but High represents the sweet spot for 4K gaming with this hardware combination.