Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 37 | 49 | 56 | 79 |
| 1440p QHD | 57 | 76 | 87 | 123 |
| 1080p Full HD | 78 | 104 | 119 | 168 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 delivers a playable experience in Lockdown Protocol at 1080p and 1440p, but only at the lowest preset for 4K. The measured data shows this combo sits in the 2293rd position out of 3714 tested configurations, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the performance spectrum. While the CPU ranks in the 79th percentile against all processors, the GPU only reaches the 66th percentile, indicating the graphics card is the primary constraint in demanding scenarios.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and preset combination for this system?
A: At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 78 FPS, which is the highest visual quality with a playable framerate. For 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 76 FPS on average. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 79 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Core i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27799, which places it 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE (27712) and 0.3% below both the Intel Core i9-10900K (27872) and AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (27887). The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896, which is 0.3% higher.
Q: What is the GPU's performance ranking relative to other graphics cards?
A: The RTX 5050 falls into the 66th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 21035. Among its nearest rivals, it sits 1.6% above the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713) and 0.6% below the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153).
Q: Which settings are not playable at 4K resolution?
A: At 3840x2160, the Medium preset averages 56 FPS with minimums dropping to 48 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 37 FPS, making all three presets unplayable at this resolution.
Q: How much framerate headroom exists at 1080p with lower presets?
A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 reaches 168 FPS average, which is more than double the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset maintains 119 FPS with a minimum of 101 FPS, providing substantial margin above the playability limit.
Q: What is the framerate difference between 1080p and 1440p at High settings?
A: At 1920x1080 High, the system averages 104 FPS, while at 2560x1440 High, it averages 76 FPS. This represents a 28 FPS drop when moving from 1080p to 1440p at the same preset level.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals demonstrate that the i5-12600KF sits in a tightly contested performance band. The Intel Core i9-10900K scores 27872, which is 0.3% lower, meaning the older flagship ten-core processor delivers essentially identical multi-threaded performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, a gaming-focused processor with additional cache, scores 27896, again 0.3% higher, indicating the i5-12600KF trades blows with that chip in synthetic workloads. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE, a lower-power desktop part, scores 27712, which is 0.3% lower, showing that the i5-12600KF maintains a slight edge over that efficiency-oriented option.
For the GPU, the RTX 5050's nearest rivals paint an interesting picture. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 21153, which is 0.6% higher, despite being an integrated graphics solution found in certain laptops. The AMD Radeon HD 8970M, a mobile GPU from a previous generation, scores 21237, which is 1% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, a desktop mid-range card from the previous architecture generation, scores 20713, which is 1.6% lower. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile, a professional laptop GPU, scores 21379, which is 1.6% higher. These deltas are all within a narrow window, suggesting that users upgrading from any of these previous-generation parts would see similar performance levels in Lockdown Protocol.
The practical implication is that this CPU-GPU combination behaves very much like a system built around any of these rival components. The CPU's 0.3% deltas are negligible in real-world gaming, and the GPU's sub-2% differences mean the RTX 5050 effectively matches the performance envelope of the RX 5600 XT and the RX Vega M GL. Users coming from those parts would not perceive a meaningful difference in Lockdown Protocol frame rates.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals how the balance of CPU and GPU workload shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 168 FPS on Low settings, which is the highest framerate recorded across all tests. This high frame rate suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently at lower resolutions where the graphics card is not fully saturated. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a drop from 168 FPS to 78 FPS, a 90 FPS difference that is entirely attributable to the GPU's rendering workload scaling with preset complexity.
Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset still delivers 123 FPS, which is 45 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result. This 27% reduction indicates that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as pixel count increases. At 1440p Ultra, the system drops to 57 FPS, falling just below the 60 FPS threshold. The difference between 1080p Ultra (78 FPS) and 1440p Ultra (57 FPS) is 21 FPS, showing that the GPU's capabilities are increasingly strained at higher resolutions with maximum settings.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The Low preset still manages 79 FPS, which is surprisingly close to the 1080p Ultra result, but the Medium preset drops to 56 FPS and Ultra falls to 37 FPS. The scaling from 1440p Low (123 FPS) to 4K Low (79 FPS) represents a 44 FPS loss, demonstrating that the RTX 5050's 320.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 2560 shading units are insufficient to maintain high framerates at 4K with anything beyond minimal settings. The CPU's role diminishes at 4K, as the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck across all presets.
The Verdict
This PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but the playable settings vary significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable: Low averages 168 FPS, Medium averages 119 FPS with a minimum of 101 FPS, High averages 104 FPS, and Ultra averages 78 FPS. The Ultra preset at 78 FPS provides headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, making 1080p the most versatile resolution for this combination.
At 2560x1440, three presets clear the 60 FPS threshold: Low averages 123 FPS, Medium averages 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS, and High averages 76 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short at 57 FPS, so users at this resolution should stick with High or lower for a consistent experience above the playability threshold.
At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is playable, averaging 79 FPS. The Medium preset averages 56 FPS with a minimum of 48 FPS, which means users will experience stutter and frame drops below the 60 FPS target. High averages 49 FPS and Ultra averages 37 FPS, both unplayable. The verdict is that 4K gaming requires a significant reduction in visual quality to maintain playable framerates.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 78 FPS. This provides the best visual quality while maintaining a comfortable margin above the threshold. The minimum framerate at Ultra is not recorded in the data, but the average indicates consistent playability.
At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, which averages 76 FPS. This represents the optimal balance between visual fidelity and performance at this resolution, with enough headroom to handle demanding scenes without dropping below 60 FPS. The Medium preset also plays well at 87 FPS, but High offers superior graphics at a minimal framerate cost.
At 3840x2160, the only playable option is Low, which averages 79 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS, but the visual quality reduction is substantial. Users prioritizing 4K resolution will need to accept minimal graphical settings, as Medium drops to 56 FPS and is not viable for smooth gameplay.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific CPU-GPU combination holds the 2293rd position out of 3714 tested configurations in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the lower 38% of all tested systems, meaning roughly 62% of configurations deliver higher framerates. The ranking reflects the GPU's mid-tier positioning, as the RTX 5050's 66th percentile score among all GPUs drags down the overall gaming performance despite the CPU's stronger 79th percentile standing.
The rank suggests that this system is positioned for 1080p gaming as its primary use case, with 1440p being a secondary option at reduced settings. The measured frame rates support this interpretation, as the system maintains high refresh rates at 1080p but struggles to sustain 60 FPS at 4K beyond the lowest preset. Users looking at this combo should expect it to handle competitive FPS games at 1080p with high settings, but should temper expectations for 4K or maximum-quality 1440p gaming.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the system produces an average of 37 FPS on Ultra, 49 FPS on High, 56 FPS on Medium with a minimum of 48 FPS and maximum of 65 FPS, and 79 FPS on Low. The spread between Ultra and Low is 42 FPS, demonstrating the GPU's sensitivity to preset changes at this resolution. The Medium preset's minimum of 48 FPS indicates noticeable frame drops during intense scenes, which explains why it falls below the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, the results are 57 FPS on Ultra, 76 FPS on High, 87 FPS on Medium with a minimum of 74 FPS and maximum of 100 FPS, and 123 FPS on Low. The Medium preset maintains a tight frame time distribution, with the minimum only 13 FPS below the average. The High preset's 76 FPS average provides consistent gameplay, while Ultra's 57 FPS average falls short of the target.
At 1920x1080, the system reaches 78 FPS on Ultra, 104 FPS on High, 119 FPS on Medium with a minimum of 101 FPS and maximum of 137 FPS, and 168 FPS on Low. The Medium preset shows excellent consistency with a 101 FPS minimum, while the Low preset's 168 FPS average suggests the CPU is capable of much higher frame rates if the GPU were faster. The 90 FPS difference between Ultra and Low at 1080p highlights the GPU's role in determining visual quality at this resolution.