Lockdown Protocol

This combo, the Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060, places in the 59th percentile of all tested configurations for Lockdown Protocol. With a rank of 2194 out of 3714 combos in the database, it sits slightly above the median, indicating a solidly mid-pack performer. The data suggests this pairing is capable of delivering a smooth experience at mainstream resolutions, though it begins to strain at the highest 4K demands.

How This Combo Ranks

The recorded benchmark data places this specific CPU and GPU pairing at rank 2194 out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol. This position, roughly in the upper-middle tier of the database, reflects a balanced system that avoids extreme bottlenecks. The GPU’s individual percentile ranking is 59th among all GPUs, while the CPU sits higher at the 71st percentile among all CPUs. This asymmetry implies the graphics card is the primary limiter for this game, which is typical for a fast-paced FPS title. The combo’s overall rank is not defined by a single weak component; rather, it shows a cohesive unit that performs as expected for its hardware class, delivering playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p with room to spare on lower presets.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear shift in component responsibility as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 175 FPS on Low settings, which drops to 81 FPS on Ultra. This wide spread, a 54% performance hit from Low to Ultra, indicates that the GPU is being heavily utilized, but the CPU is keeping up without becoming the primary constraint. The frame rate scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is nearly linear, suggesting a balanced load where both components are working in tandem.

Moving to 2560x1440, the story changes subtly. The average FPS on Low is 128, and on Ultra it falls to 60, a 53% reduction. The relative performance drop is similar to 1080p, but the absolute numbers are lower, confirming that the GPU is now the dominant factor. At 3840x2160, the GPU’s role becomes even more pronounced. The average FPS on Low is 83, but on Ultra it plummets to 39, a 53% drop again. Interestingly, the percentage scaling is consistent across resolutions, which points to a GPU-bound scenario where the i5-11400F provides sufficient headroom. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 868 in the 3dmark single-thread test supports this, as it ensures the processor does not become the limiting factor even at lower resolutions where frame rates are high.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the database shows a full range of playable settings. On Low, the average frame rate is 175 FPS, a very high number that indicates minimal CPU or GPU stress. Medium settings yield an average of 124 FPS, with recorded minimums of 106 and maximums of 143 FPS, showing smooth frame pacing. High settings produce an average of 109 FPS, still well above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings drop the average to 81 FPS, which remains comfortably playable.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. Low settings deliver an average of 128 FPS, while Medium averages 91 FPS with a minimum of 77 and a maximum of 105 FPS. High settings average 80 FPS, and Ultra settings exactly hit the 60 FPS playable threshold, making it the highest preset that maintains a playable average. The data shows no min or max values for most 1440p presets, but the Medium preset’s range of 77 to 105 FPS indicates consistent performance without significant dips.

At 3840x2160, the limits of this combo become apparent. Low settings average 83 FPS, which is playable. Medium settings average 59 FPS, just below the 60 FPS threshold, with a minimum of 50 and a maximum of 68 FPS. High settings average 51 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 39 FPS. The data clearly shows that 4K gaming is only viable on the Low preset, where the frame rate remains fluid, while higher presets result in increasingly noticeable stutter and reduced responsiveness.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU provide context for its capabilities. The AMD EPYC 7H12 scores 0.3% higher in average benchmarks, meaning the i5-11400F is effectively its peer in multi-threaded workloads. The Intel Core i5-12450H scores 0.4% lower, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is 0.6% slower, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U is 0.6% faster. These differences are negligible, so any of these processors would yield nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, provided the GPU remains the same.

For the GPU, the closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores 0.7% higher on average. The AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon RX 7700 both score 1% higher, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 2.1% ahead. These deltas are minor, meaning all of these graphics cards would produce very similar performance in this game. A system with an i5-11400F and any of these GPUs would likely land within a few frames per second of the measured results, especially at 1080p and 1440p where the GPU’s influence is dominant.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that still clears the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 81 FPS. This allows for maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also averages exactly 60 FPS, making it the best choice for players who prioritize image quality over headroom. The data shows this is the edge of the combo’s capability at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the situation is different. The Low preset is the only option that stays above 60 FPS, averaging 83 FPS. The Medium preset falls just short at 59 FPS, which may be acceptable for some, but the recorded minimum of 50 FPS suggests occasional stutter. For a consistent experience, Low is the recommended setting at 4K, offering a high frame rate that leverages the CPU’s strong single-thread performance.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 1080p on Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 81 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest playable preset at 2560x1440?

A: The Ultra preset achieves an average of exactly 60 FPS at 2560x1440, making it the most demanding preset that remains playable.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combo?

A: Only on the Low preset, which averages 83 FPS. The Medium preset averages 59 FPS, just below the threshold, while High and Ultra are not recommended due to averages of 51 and 39 FPS respectively.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti in this context?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score that is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3060 Ti, indicating nearly identical performance for this game.

Q: Which component is more important for performance at 4K?

A: The data shows the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, as frame rates drop significantly with higher presets, while the CPU’s single-thread performance remains sufficient.

Q: Does the i5-11400F bottleneck the RX 9060 at 1080p?

A: No, the high frame rates at Low and Medium presets (175 and 124 FPS respectively) indicate the CPU provides adequate headroom, with the GPU still being the primary driver of performance.

The Verdict

The database verdict confirms that this PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but the experience varies by resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with Ultra averaging 81 FPS, making it the best choice for a fully smooth and visually rich experience. At 2560x1440, all presets also clear 60 FPS, with Ultra hitting exactly 60 FPS, allowing for high-quality gameplay without compromise.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more restrictive. Only the Low preset is playable, averaging 83 FPS. The Medium preset falls just short at 59 FPS, and High and Ultra are not viable options. For 4K users, the recommendation is to stick with Low settings to maintain a fluid frame rate. Overall, this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it offers a wide range of settings and excellent performance, while 4K demands a significant compromise on visual quality.