Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 68 | 87 | 102 | 142 |
| 1440p QHD | 102 | 139 | 156 | 212 |
| 1080p Full HD | 144 | 185 | 209 | 236 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX delivers a very capable experience in Lockdown Protocol, a fast-paced FPS. The recorded data shows frame rates that are consistently above the 60 FPS playability threshold across every tested resolution and preset combination. This combination of a six-core, twelve-thread Rocket Lake processor with a high-end RDNA 3 graphics card produces results that favor high refresh rate monitors, even at demanding 4K resolutions. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, compares it to nearby hardware, and explains which component drives the frame rate at each setting.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark database contains measured average frame rates for three resolutions and four graphical presets. Minimum and maximum frame rates were not recorded, so all analysis is based on average FPS values.
At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 236.2. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 209.1, which is still an extremely smooth experience. High settings produce an average of 184.9 FPS, while Ultra settings, the most demanding preset, still maintain an average of 144 FPS. This means that even at the highest visual quality, the system consistently delivers frame rates that are more than double the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a performance cost of roughly 92 FPS, but every preset remains far above any playability concern.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains very strong. Low settings yield an average of 211.5 FPS. Medium settings follow with 155.7 FPS, and High settings produce 138.9 FPS. Ultra settings still achieve an average of 102.4 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra at this resolution is about 109 FPS, which is a larger absolute difference than at 1080p, but the lowest average FPS recorded here is still well above 60. The system handles the increased pixel count without breaking a sweat, and the data indicates that this combination is ideal for 1440p high refresh rate gaming.
At 3840x2160, the performance is still impressive, though the impact of the higher resolution is clear. Low settings average 141.9 FPS, which is a very high frame rate for 4K. Medium settings drop to 101.7 FPS, and High settings average 86.9 FPS. Ultra settings are the only preset that approaches the lower end of the spectrum, with an average of 68.2 FPS. This is still above the 60 FPS playable threshold, but it is the closest the combination gets to that boundary. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K shows a performance cost of about 74 FPS, which is a significant reduction, but the final result remains playable.
The data shows a clear pattern: as resolution increases, average frame rates decrease across all presets. The gap between Low and Ultra settings also varies with resolution. At 1080p, the gap is 92 FPS, at 1440p it is 109 FPS, and at 4K it is 74 FPS. This indicates that at lower resolutions, the CPU has more headroom to push higher frame rates, while at 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, compressing the difference between presets.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The database provides nearest rival comparisons for both the CPU and GPU, based on average benchmark scores. These comparisons help contextualize where this specific hardware combination stands relative to other components.
For the Intel Core i5-11400F, the nearest rivals are all very close in average benchmark score. The AMD EPYC 7H12 has a score that is 0.3% higher, making it virtually identical in overall performance. The Intel Core i5-12450H is 0.4% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is 0.6% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U is 0.6% higher. These deltas are all under one percent, meaning that in synthetic benchmarks, these processors are effectively interchangeable. In a real game like Lockdown Protocol, swapping the i5-11400F for any of these rivals would likely produce very similar frame rates, assuming the GPU remains unchanged. The CPU is not the bottleneck at most settings, so the impact of these tiny score differences would be minimal.
For the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, the nearest rivals show a wider range of delta values. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB has a score that is 0.4% higher, which is surprising given the generational gap, but the database records it as a close match. The NVIDIA Quadro K5200 is 1% lower, and the AMD FirePro D300 is 1.2% lower. The NVIDIA TITAN Xp is 1.2% higher. These rivals, while similar in average benchmark score, are very different in architecture and feature set, but the data suggests that in terms of raw compute performance, they would behave similarly. In gaming, the RX 7900 XTX would likely outperform some of these older cards due to driver optimizations and newer API support, but based solely on the recorded scores, a user could expect similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol.
When considering the full combination, the CPU and GPU rivals together suggest that this system sits in a performance tier where small changes in component selection would not drastically alter the gaming experience. The CPU is a solid mid-range part, and the GPU is a high-end part, so the GPU dominates the frame rate calculations. Any of the listed rival CPUs or GPUs would keep the system in the same general performance bracket.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured data reveals how the CPU and GPU divide responsibilities in Lockdown Protocol. The key insight comes from comparing frame rates across resolutions and presets.
At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extremely high, reaching 236.2 FPS on Low settings. This indicates that the GPU is not fully stressed at this resolution. The CPU, with its six cores and twelve threads, has enough power to feed the GPU at these high frame rates. The fact that Ultra settings still produce 144 FPS suggests that the GPU has plenty of headroom, and the CPU is managing to keep up with the demand. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 92 FPS drop, which is primarily due to increased GPU workload from higher quality textures and effects.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop across all presets, but the relative drop from 1080p is consistent. For example, High settings drop from 184.9 FPS at 1080p to 138.9 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 46 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as the pixel count increases. The CPU is likely still not the bottleneck, as the frame rates remain well above 100 FPS even on Ultra settings.
At 3840x2160, the GPU clearly takes over as the dominant component. The frame rates drop significantly, with Ultra settings averaging 68.2 FPS. This is a 75.8 FPS drop from the 1440p Ultra result, which shows how much stress 4K resolution places on the GPU. The CPU, meanwhile, has less work to do since the frame rate is lower, so it is no longer a limiting factor. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is 74 FPS, which is smaller than the drop at 1440p, suggesting that the GPU is hitting its limits and the preset changes have less impact.
The data implies that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU and GPU are well balanced, with the GPU having enough power to handle high frame rates and the CPU able to keep up. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and the CPU has spare capacity. This is a common pattern for high-end GPUs paired with mid-range CPUs. The i5-11400F is sufficient for this game, but it is not the primary driver of performance at higher resolutions.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with Ultra settings?*
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 68.2, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict data confirms that Ultra settings are playable at 4K.
Q: What is the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS at 1080p?
A: All presets at 1080p stay above 60 FPS. The most demanding preset, Ultra, has an average FPS of 144, which is far above the threshold.
Q: How much does resolution affect performance?
A: The data shows a significant drop when moving from 1440p to 4K. For example, High settings drop from 138.9 FPS at 1440p to 86.9 FPS at 4K, a reduction of 52 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is smaller, with High settings dropping from 184.9 FPS to 138.9 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?
A: At 1080p and 1440p, both components are important, but the GPU has more headroom. At 4K, the GPU is the clear limiting factor, as frame rates drop significantly while the CPU likely has spare capacity.
Q: What are the best settings for a 1440p monitor?
A: The database lists Ultra as the best settings at 2560x1440, with an average FPS of 102.4. This preset provides the highest visual quality while staying well above 60 FPS.
Q: Are the frame rates smooth enough for competitive play?
A: At 1080p and 1440p, the average FPS is very high, exceeding 100 FPS on all presets. At 4K, even Ultra settings maintain 68.2 FPS, which is smooth for most players, though lower presets offer higher frame rates.
The Verdict
The recorded data clearly shows that the Intel Core i5-11400F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX combination can run Lockdown Protocol with excellent performance. The verdict by resolution confirms that all tested resolutions and presets are playable, meaning they all achieve an average FPS above 60.
At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. The highest average FPS is 236.2 on Low settings, and the lowest is 144 on Ultra settings. This means the system is more than capable of running the game at high refresh rates on a 1080p monitor.
At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds. All presets are playable, with Ultra settings averaging 102.4 FPS. This is an ideal resolution for this combination, as it provides a balance between visual fidelity and performance. The frame rates are high enough for smooth gameplay, and the GPU is not overly stressed.
At 3840x2160, the system still delivers playable frame rates. Ultra settings average 68.2 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold. High settings average 86.9 FPS, Medium settings average 101.7 FPS, and Low settings average 141.9 FPS. This shows that 4K gaming is viable, though Ultra settings are the most demanding and leave the least headroom.
Overall, this PC can run the game at any resolution in the database. The weakest result is 4K Ultra at 68.2 FPS, which is still playable. For users seeking the highest visual quality, 4K Ultra is an option, but lower presets provide more margin for error and higher frame rates.
Best Settings per Resolution
The database provides a clear recommendation for the best settings at each resolution, defined as the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, with an average FPS of 144. This is the highest visual quality preset, and it delivers a frame rate that is more than double the playable threshold. The data shows that even the most demanding settings are not a challenge for this hardware at 1080p.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, with an average FPS of 102.4. This preset provides the full visual experience while maintaining a frame rate that is well above 60 FPS. The system has enough GPU power to handle 1440p Ultra without any issues.
At 3840x2160, the best settings are Ultra, with an average FPS of 68.2. This is the most demanding setup, and it just clears the 60 FPS threshold. The data indicates that 4K Ultra is playable, but users who prefer higher frame rates might choose High settings, which average 86.9 FPS, for a smoother experience.
In all cases, the best settings are Ultra, which shows that this hardware combination is not limited by the game's graphical options. The only consideration is that 4K Ultra has less headroom, so any future updates or more demanding scenes could push frame rates lower, but the recorded data shows it is currently playable.
How This Combo Ranks
The database ranks this specific combination of CPU and GPU against all other tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol. The combo rank is 610 out of 3,714 total combinations. This places the system in the top 17% of all tested hardware configurations.
This ranking is notable because the CPU, the Intel Core i5-11400F, is a mid-range processor from 2021, while the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, is a high-end card from 2022. The combination performs better than the vast majority of systems, which often include more balanced pairings. The high rank is driven primarily by the GPU, which provides the bulk of the frame rate capability, especially at higher resolutions.
Compared to the nearest rivals, the CPU is closely matched with other processors in its performance tier, and the GPU is also closely matched with its rivals in synthetic benchmarks. However, in actual gameplay, the RX 7900 XTX's modern architecture and 24 GB of GDDR6 memory likely give it an edge over older rivals like the GTX 1060 or TITAN Xp, even if their average benchmark scores are similar. The rank of 610 reflects this strong in-game performance.
The data implies that this is a well-performing combination, but not the absolute top. The top 600 combinations likely include newer CPUs and even more powerful GPUs. Still, for a system with a six-core processor and a high-end GPU, this rank is very respectable. Users with this hardware can expect a smooth and responsive experience in Lockdown Protocol, with the ability to play at high settings and high resolutions. The only limitation is 4K Ultra, which is playable but has less headroom than other presets.