Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing but may impact FPS.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 23 | 31 | 38 | 51 |
| 1440p QHD | 38 | 51 | 61 | 82 |
| 1080p Full HD | 52 | 73 | 81 | 112 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB shows a clear performance profile in Lockdown Protocol, with results that scale predictably across resolutions and presets. The recorded data indicates that this combination is capable of smooth gameplay at standard resolutions, but it struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K. The following analysis breaks down the measured FPS, optimal settings, and the roles each component plays in this specific title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination delivers its strongest results. The Low preset produces an average of 112 FPS, which is the highest recorded average for this pairing across all tested configurations. The Medium preset follows at 81.2 FPS, and the High preset achieves 72.6 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 52.1 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline of roughly 10 FPS per step, with the most significant drop occurring between High and Ultra.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down considerably but remains workable for several presets. The Low preset records an average of 82 FPS, which is still well above the playable threshold. The Medium preset averages 61.3 FPS, just barely clearing the 60 FPS mark. The High preset drops to 51.3 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls further to 38.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at this resolution is approximately 21 FPS, indicating that the Medium preset carries a substantial rendering cost.
At 3840x2160, the results are largely below the playable threshold. The Low preset averages 51 FPS, which is the only configuration at this resolution that comes close to 60 FPS. The Medium preset averages 38.2 FPS, the High preset averages 30.5 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 23.4 FPS. The data shows a steep performance cliff at 4K, with even the lowest settings failing to maintain a consistent 60 FPS.
The measured FPS values at each resolution and preset illustrate a clear pattern: the RTX 3050 4 GB has enough headroom for 1080p and 1440p gaming at moderate settings, but 4K is only feasible with significant compromises. The lack of min and max FPS data means the analysis relies solely on average frame rates, which still provide a reliable basis for comparing presets and resolutions.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 72.6 FPS. This leaves a comfortable margin above the playable threshold, so users can enjoy the High preset without worrying about frame rate dips. The Ultra preset at 52.1 FPS is not recommended, as it sacrifices smoothness for marginal visual gains.
At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is Medium, with an average of 61.3 FPS. This is a tight margin, just 1.3 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold, so users who prioritize stability over visual fidelity might prefer the Low preset at 82 FPS. However, for those who want the best visuals while maintaining playability, Medium is the highest setting that clears the bar.
At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset comes closest at 51 FPS, but it still falls short. The data indicates that 4K gaming is not viable with this hardware combination in Lockdown Protocol, regardless of settings.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on 1920x1080?
A: Yes, at 1920x1080 the High preset averages 72.6 FPS, and the Low and Medium presets also clear the 60 FPS threshold with averages of 112 FPS and 81.2 FPS respectively. The Ultra preset does not reach 60 FPS, averaging 52.1 FPS.
Q: What is the highest playable setting at 2560x1440?
A: The Medium preset is the highest setting that stays at or above 60 FPS at 2560x1440, with an average of 61.3 FPS. The Low preset averages 82 FPS, but the High and Ultra presets fall below the threshold at 51.3 FPS and 38.4 FPS.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?
A: No, the data shows that no preset at 3840x2160 reaches the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset averages 51 FPS, which is the best result at this resolution, but it still falls short of playable frame rates.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440?
A: At the Low preset, the average FPS drops from 112 at 1920x1080 to 82 at 2560x1440, a decrease of 30 FPS. At the Medium preset, the drop is from 81.2 to 61.3, a difference of roughly 20 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset for visual quality at 1920x1080?
A: The High preset offers the best visual quality while maintaining playable performance, with an average of 72.6 FPS. The Ultra preset provides higher visual quality but drops to 52.1 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.
Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High at 2560x1440?
A: The Ultra preset averages 38.4 FPS at 2560x1440, which is significantly lower than the High preset's 51.3 FPS. Both presets fall below the 60 FPS threshold at this resolution, so neither is recommended for smooth gameplay.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-10400F, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Xeon 6756E, the Intel Core 7 160UL, the AMD EPYC 7552, and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C. The Xeon 6756E scores 14,163 with a delta of 0.2 percent, meaning it performs nearly identically to the i5-10400F. The Core 7 160UL scores 14,232 with a delta of -0.3 percent, indicating it is slightly faster. The EPYC 7552 scores 14,115 with a delta of 0.5 percent, making it marginally slower. The Ryzen 3 7320C scores 14,277 with a delta of -0.6 percent, placing it slightly above the i5-10400F in synthetic tests. In practice, any of these CPUs would deliver similar CPU-bound performance in Lockdown Protocol, though the differences are small enough that the GPU would remain the primary bottleneck.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB has no nearest rivals listed in the database, so direct GPU comparisons are not available. However, the measured FPS data provides a clear reference point for how this specific GPU behaves in this game across different settings and resolutions.
The Verdict
The verdict is straightforward based on the recorded data. At 1920x1080, this PC can run Lockdown Protocol at the High preset with an average of 72.6 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The Low and Medium presets also clear the bar, making 1080p gaming fully viable. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset averages 61.3 FPS, which just barely clears the threshold, so 1440p gaming is possible but only with reduced settings. The Low preset at 82 FPS offers a safer margin for those who prefer higher frame rates. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS, and the best result is the Low preset at 51 FPS. The verdict by resolution confirms this: 2560x1440 is playable at Low and Medium, 1920x1080 is playable at High, Low, and Medium, and 3840x2160 has no playable settings.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database, this combination of the Intel Core i5-10400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB ranks 3,265 out of 3,714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the lower portion of the ranking, with roughly 88 percent of tested configurations performing better. The rank reflects the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions, as the CPU is more than capable of handling the game's processing demands. Users with this combo should expect a mid-to-low tier experience compared to other systems in the database, with playable performance limited to 1080p and modest 1440p settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck for this game at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 112 FPS, which suggests the CPU is feeding the GPU well enough to reach high frame rates. As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the Low preset drops to 82 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it drops further to 51 FPS. This scaling pattern is consistent with GPU-bound behavior: the frame rate declines as the rendering load increases, while the CPU's workload remains relatively constant.
The preset scaling also points to the GPU as the limiting factor. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra is roughly 60 FPS, from 112 to 52.1. At 2560x1440, the same comparison shows a drop from 82 to 38.4, a difference of about 44 FPS. At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 51 FPS and the Ultra preset averages 23.4, a difference of about 28 FPS. The shrinking gap at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is saturated, and additional visual settings have a smaller relative impact on frame rate.
The CPU's role is less pronounced but still relevant. With a 3dmark single-thread score of 688 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,283, the i5-10400F provides solid single-threaded performance for an FPS title. The 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to handle the game's logic and physics, and the 12 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency. However, the CPU's benchmark percentile of 68 against all CPUs suggests it is a mid-range part, and in this game, it is unlikely to be the limiting factor at any resolution given the GPU's constraints.
In summary, the RTX 3050 4 GB dictates the experience in Lockdown Protocol. At 1080p, the GPU has enough headroom to run High settings at 72.6 FPS. At 1440p, Medium settings barely clear 60 FPS. At 4K, the GPU cannot maintain playable frame rates at any preset. The CPU, while not a weak point, does not meaningfully influence the outcome because the GPU saturates well before the CPU reaches its limits. Users looking to improve performance should focus on GPU upgrades, as the i5-10400F has enough headroom to support a more powerful graphics card in this title.