Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 56 | 67 | 94 |
| 1440p QHD | 69 | 92 | 103 | 147 |
| 1080p Full HD | 94 | 125 | 142 | 199 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is a mid-range desktop combination tested in Lockdown Protocol, an FPS released in March 2024. According to the database, this combo ranks 1805th out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it near the middle of the field. The following analysis uses measured frame rates across three resolutions and four quality presets to determine how this system handles the game.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo ranks 1805th out of 3714 in the database for Lockdown Protocol. That puts it just below the median, meaning roughly half of all tested CPU-GPU pairs deliver higher average frame rates in this game. The CPU itself sits at the 68th percentile among all processors in synthetic benchmarks, while the GPU is at the 71st percentile among all graphics cards. These percentile scores come from the aggregate benchmark suite, not from Lockdown Protocol specifically, but they give context: the processor is slightly above average, and the graphics card is slightly higher. In this game, the combination lands in the middle because Lockdown Protocol is demanding enough at higher presets to keep the GPU busy, while the six-core, twelve-thread CPU is sufficient for the game's logic at lower settings. The rank indicates that many faster combos exist, but also that a large number of slower ones do too. For a 1080p or 1440p target, this pairing is competitive; at 4K Ultra it falls behind.
CPU and GPU Roles
The recorded frame rates show a clear pattern of GPU scaling across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 199.2 FPS, while at 4K Low it drops to 94.2 FPS, a 53% reduction. At Ultra settings, the drop from 1080p to 4K is from 94.4 to 41.8, a 56% reduction. This consistent decline as resolution increases indicates that the Radeon RX 6750 XT becomes the limiting factor at higher pixel counts. The CPU, with its six cores and twelve threads, is capable of feeding high frame rates at 1080p; the 199 FPS at Low suggests that the processor is not the bottleneck at that resolution and preset. However, when the preset is raised to Ultra at 1080p, the frame rate falls to 94.4, which is still high but shows that the GPU is doing more work. At 1440p, the same pattern holds: Low gives 147.1 FPS, Ultra gives 68.8. At 4K, even Low drops to 94.2, and Ultra drops to 41.8, well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data suggests that the CPU's role is most visible at low resolutions and low presets, where it can push well over 150 FPS. As resolution and preset increase, the GPU's workload grows and the frame rate becomes limited by the RX 6750 XT's throughput. The CPU's single-thread score of 688 in 3DMark and multi-thread score of 4748 in the 16-thread test are moderate, but they are enough to avoid holding back the GPU in this game at the tested settings. For players targeting 4K, the GPU will be the deciding factor; for 1080p, the CPU is rarely the constraint.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The database records average FPS for each resolution and preset combination. No minimum or maximum values are available, so the analysis relies on averages.
At 3840x2160:
- Low: 94.2 FPS
- Medium: 66.7 FPS
- High: 56.4 FPS
- Ultra: 41.8 FPS
At 2560x1440:
- Low: 147.1 FPS
- Medium: 102.6 FPS
- High: 92.1 FPS
- Ultra: 68.8 FPS
At 1920x1080:
- Low: 199.2 FPS
- Medium: 142.4 FPS
- High: 125.3 FPS
- Ultra: 94.4 FPS
These numbers show a consistent step down as resolution increases. For example, at Medium settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p costs 39.8 FPS (from 142.4 to 102.6), and moving from 1440p to 4K costs another 35.9 FPS (to 66.7). At Ultra, the cost of each resolution step is similar: 25.6 FPS from 1080p to 1440p, and 27.0 FPS from 1440p to 4K. The frame rate at 1080p Low is nearly 200 FPS, which is well above the refresh rate of most monitors, so the CPU and GPU combination has headroom at that setting. At 4K Ultra, the 41.8 FPS average is not smooth for a fast-paced FPS. The lack of minimum and maximum data means we cannot comment on frame time consistency, but the averages alone indicate that the system is playable at many settings.
The Verdict
Using the playable threshold of 60 FPS, the verdict is clear. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 94.4 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets also pass 60 FPS, with Ultra at 68.8 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium are playable: Low averages 94.2 FPS and Medium averages 66.7 FPS. High falls to 56.4 and Ultra to 41.8, both below the threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is Medium, which provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. For 1440p, the best setting is Ultra at 68.8 FPS, and for 1080p, Ultra at 94.4 FPS is the best choice. This system can run Lockdown Protocol smoothly at 1080p and 1440p with maximum quality, and at 4K with medium quality. Players who prioritize visual fidelity at 4K would need to accept lower settings or a lower frame rate.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The database lists the nearest rivals based on aggregate benchmark scores. For the Intel Core i5-10400F, the closest performers are the Intel Xeon 6756E (average score 14163, 0.2% lower), the Intel Core 7 160UL (14232, 0.3% higher), the AMD EPYC 7552 (14115, 0.5% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (14277, 0.6% higher). These processors have similar overall benchmark scores, so in Lockdown Protocol they would likely produce comparable CPU-bound frame rates, though game-specific behavior can differ. For the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (25891, 0.5% higher), the AMD FirePro W7100 (25856, 0.6% higher), the AMD FirePro D700 (25842, 0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (25740, 1.1% higher). Note that the GPU rivals include mobile and workstation parts, but the database treats them as similar in aggregate performance. In practice, the RX 6750 XT's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus give it a specification advantage over some of these, but the benchmark scores are close. Players with any of these alternative components can expect similar frame rates in this game, assuming the rest of the system is comparable. The launch MSRP of the RX 6750 XT is 549 USD, but that figure is not part of the performance analysis.
FAQ
Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol?
A: The Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination ranks 1805th out of 3714 tested combos.
Q: Which settings are playable at 3840x2160?
A: At 4K, Low and Medium presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Medium averaging 66.7 FPS. High and Ultra fall below at 56.4 and 41.8 FPS respectively.
Q: What is the best setting at 2560x1440?
A: All four presets are playable at 1440p. The best is Ultra, which averages 68.8 FPS.
Q: How many threads does the CPU have?
A: The Intel Core i5-10400F has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?
A: The launch MSRP of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 549 USD.