Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

18%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
115 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
54 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
81 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
36 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
56 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
23 FPS
14.5ms Frame Time
22ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 13,494
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 0

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Available

Your GPU supports ray tracing but may impact FPS.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 23 36 39 56
1440p QHD 36 49 59 81
1080p Full HD 54 69 81 115

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 69
1920x1080 Low 115
1920x1080 Medium 81
1920x1080 Ultra 54
2560x1440 High 49
2560x1440 Low 81
2560x1440 Medium 59
2560x1440 Ultra 36
3840x2160 High 36
3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 Ultra 23

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Lockdown Protocol is a demanding FPS title, and this particular combination of an Intel Core i3-12100F and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB produces a very specific set of outcomes across the three primary resolutions. The benchmark data shows a system that is fully capable of smooth play at 1080p with high settings, viable at 1440p only when dropping to low settings, and entirely unable to maintain a playable frame rate at 4K. The measured results paint a clear picture of a pairing that is balanced for 1080p gaming but runs out of headroom as pixel count increases.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data indicates that the most demanding preset that stays at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold differs significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 69.2 FPS on the High preset, which is the best visual quality that still clears the 60 FPS bar. While the Medium preset runs faster at 81.4 FPS, High is the superior choice as it offers more visual fidelity while remaining comfortably above the target. The Ultra preset, at 54.4 FPS, falls below the threshold and should be avoided for consistent smoothness.

Moving up to 2560x1440, the situation changes drastically. The only setting that maintains an average at or above 60 FPS is Low, which produces an average of 81.4 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 58.5 FPS, just under the playable line, and High falls to 49.2 FPS. Therefore, Low is the only viable option at this resolution, sacrificing most visual enhancements to maintain performance. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS target. The best result is on Low at 55.7 FPS, which is still below the playable threshold, making 4K effectively unplayable with this hardware.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals which component is the primary driver of performance. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low (115.2 FPS) and Ultra (54.4 FPS) is a massive 60.8 FPS swing, indicating that the GPU is heavily taxed by higher settings. This is classic GPU-bound behavior; the graphics card is the limiting factor when increasing visual complexity at a fixed resolution. The CPU, a 4-core/8-thread part with a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, has enough headroom at 1080p to feed the GPU, but the RTX 3050 4 GB cannot keep up with the demands of Ultra settings.

At 2560x1440, the pattern continues but with an overall performance drop. The spread between Low (81.4 FPS) and Ultra (35.9 FPS) is 45.5 FPS, again showing GPU dominance. However, the fact that Medium (58.5 FPS) is so close to the 60 FPS line suggests that the system is becoming more balanced; the CPU is still keeping pace, but the GPU is working much harder. By 3840x2160, the GPU is completely overwhelmed. The difference between Low (55.7 FPS) and Ultra (22.7 FPS) is 33 FPS, but even Low cannot reach 60 FPS. This shows that the RTX 3050 4 GB lacks the raw pixel throughput for 4K, regardless of settings. The CPU role diminishes at higher resolutions, as the GPU becomes the absolute bottleneck, a common trait for a mid-range card paired with a budget processor.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Core i3-12100F and RTX 3050 4 GB deliver a wide range of results. The Low preset hits an average of 115.2 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play. Medium averages 81.4 FPS, and High averages 69.2 FPS, both solidly playable. Ultra is the only setting that dips below the threshold at 54.4 FPS. This resolution is clearly the sweet spot for this combo, offering playable frame rates on three out of four presets.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops are significant. Low averages 81.4 FPS, which is still very playable. Medium drops to 58.5 FPS, just under the 60 FPS target. High averages 49.2 FPS, and Ultra falls to 35.9 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 22.9 FPS, showing a steep penalty for the first step up in quality. At 3840x2160, the system struggles across the board. Low averages 55.7 FPS, Medium averages 39 FPS, High averages 36.1 FPS, and Ultra plummets to 22.7 FPS. None of these are playable, and the data confirms that 4K is outside this hardware's capability.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested configurations, this pairing sits in the lower-middle tier. The combo rank is 3248 out of 3714 total combos, placing it in the bottom 13% of all tested systems. This is a low ranking overall, but it must be interpreted in context. The database includes high-end rigs with top-tier CPUs and GPUs, so a budget-oriented combo like this will naturally rank low. However, the ranking reflects that there are many more powerful combinations available, and this one is not designed for high-resolution or high-refresh-rate gaming. The CPU itself, the Core i3-12100F, holds a 68th percentile ranking among all CPUs tested, showing it is a competent mid-range processor. The GPU, however, has a 50th percentile ranking, indicating it is average when compared to all other GPUs. The combination of an above-average CPU with an average GPU results in a system that is limited primarily by its graphics card.

The nearest CPU rivals highlight the processor's position. The Intel Core i5-9500 has an average score that is 0.3% higher, making it a nearly identical performer. The Intel Core 3 N355 is exactly on par with a 0% delta. The Intel Core 5 120UL is 0.7% lower, and the Intel Core i7-1250U is 1.1% higher. These tiny margins show that the i3-12100F is a solid performer for its class, but it does not have the multi-core muscle to push higher frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. In this game, however, the GPU is the clear limiting factor, so the CPU's rank is less relevant to the final FPS numbers.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 1920x1080?

A: Yes, it can. The benchmark data shows playable frame rates on High (69.2 FPS), Medium (81.4 FPS), and Low (115.2 FPS). The Ultra preset is not playable, averaging 54.4 FPS.

Q: What is the best setting at 2560x1440?

A: The only playable setting is Low, which achieves an average of 81.4 FPS. The Medium preset falls just below the 60 FPS threshold at 58.5 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with an RTX 3050 4 GB?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset only averages 55.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. All other presets are significantly lower.

Q: How does the Core i3-12100F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i3-12100F is closely matched with the Intel Core i5-9500, which is 0.3% faster in average benchmark score. It is also on par with the Intel Core 3 N355 (0% delta) and slightly ahead of the Intel Core 5 120UL (-0.7% delta).

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra at 1920x1080?

A: The difference is substantial. Low averages 115.2 FPS, while Ultra averages 54.4 FPS, a drop of 60.8 FPS. This shows the GPU is heavily taxed by higher quality settings.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck for this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions. The performance drop from Low to Ultra is steep at all resolutions, and at 4K even Low cannot reach 60 FPS, showing the graphics card is overwhelmed.

The Verdict

The verdict is clear: this PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but only under specific conditions. At 1920x1080, the system is a capable performer, with High settings delivering a smooth 69.2 FPS average. This is the recommended way to play, as it balances visual quality with performance. The Medium and Low presets are also viable, offering 81.4 and 115.2 FPS respectively for those who prefer higher frame rates. The Ultra preset is not recommended, as it drops below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system is only playable on Low settings, which hits 81.4 FPS. This is a usable experience, but it requires a significant visual compromise. The Medium preset at 58.5 FPS is borderline and could be considered by players who prioritize image quality over a strict 60 FPS target, but it is not officially playable by the data's standard. At 3840x2160, the system is not playable at any setting; the best result is 55.7 FPS on Low, which is below the threshold. For 4K gaming, a more powerful GPU is required. In summary, this combination of an Intel Core i3-12100F and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is a solid 1080p gaming setup, a marginal 1440p option, and not suitable for 4K.