Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 36 | 43 | 54 | 71 |
| 1440p QHD | 55 | 67 | 83 | 110 |
| 1080p Full HD | 74 | 95 | 108 | 155 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
Can Intel Core i3-12100F + Intel Arc B580 run Lockdown Protocol? The measured data says yes, but the experience varies sharply by resolution and preset. At 1080p, this combo is firmly in playable territory across all tested settings, while 1440p requires a slight compromise, and 4K demands a significant one. The benchmark results show a system that is capable but not uniformly dominant, with performance scaling that reveals a clear division of labor between the four-core CPU and the 12 GB GPU.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed picture of how this combo handles Lockdown Protocol across three resolutions and four presets. At 1920x1080, the system performs exceptionally well. With Low settings, the average frame rate hits 155 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold of 60 FPS. Stepping up to Medium yields 108.4 FPS, while High settings still deliver a strong 95 FPS. Even at Ultra, the most demanding preset, the average remains at 73.9 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS line. This resolution shows the least variation between presets, with a spread from 73.9 to 155 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops noticeably but remains respectable. Low settings produce 109.5 FPS, which is still excellent for competitive play. Medium settings deliver 82.9 FPS, and High settings maintain 66.6 FPS. However, Ultra settings fall below the playable threshold at 54.6 FPS, indicating that this preset is not viable at this resolution. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 54.9 FPS, showing that the GPU is becoming a more significant factor as pixel count increases.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Low settings manage 70.6 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold, but Medium drops to 54.2 FPS, and High falls further to 43.3 FPS. Ultra is the weakest showing at 35.7 FPS, which is barely more than half the playable threshold. The performance cliff between Low and Ultra at 4K is steep, with a 34.9 FPS difference, underscoring how demanding this resolution is on the Arc B580. Notably, the data does not include min or max FPS values for any configuration, so the analysis relies solely on averages, which may hide occasional stutters or frame time spikes.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals which component dominates in Lockdown Protocol. At 1920x1080, the CPU likely plays a more prominent role, as the GPU has ample headroom to render frames quickly. The fact that Ultra at 1080p produces 73.9 FPS while High at 1440p produces 66.6 FPS suggests that the GPU is still capable, but the CPU's four cores and eight threads may be limiting the maximum frame rates at lower resolutions. The 3DMark scores for the i3-12100F support this: a single-thread score of 893 and a 4-thread score of 2859 indicate decent per-core performance, but the 8-thread score of 4026 and max-thread score of 4023 show that scaling beyond four threads is minimal. Lockdown Protocol, being a modern FPS, might not fully utilize more than eight threads, but the i3's 12 MB of L3 cache could be a bottleneck in complex scenes.
As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The drop from 155 FPS at 1080p Low to 109.5 FPS at 1440p Low represents a 29.4% reduction, which is less than the pixel count increase (from 2.07 million to 3.69 million pixels, a 78% increase). This suggests that at Low settings, the CPU is still keeping up, and the GPU is not yet saturated. However, at Ultra settings, the drop from 73.9 FPS at 1080p to 54.6 FPS at 1440p (a 26.1% decrease) and then to 35.7 FPS at 4K (a 51.7% decrease from 1440p) indicates that the Arc B580's compute resources are being overwhelmed. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS and 2560 shading units are the relevant specs here, and the data shows that Ultra at 4K demands more than they can deliver.
The 4K results are particularly telling. Low settings at 4K produce 70.6 FPS, which is higher than Ultra at 1440p (54.6 FPS). This implies that the GPU's memory bandwidth (456.0 GB/s) and 12 GB of VRAM are sufficient for the higher resolution, but the shading workload at Ultra is the limiting factor. The CPU's role at 4K diminishes, as the i3-12100F is likely not the bottleneck when the GPU is struggling to maintain 40 FPS. In summary, the CPU is the key at 1080p, while the GPU takes over as the dominant constraint at 1440p and especially 4K.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context on what other hardware would behave similarly. For the Intel Core i3-12100F, the closest match is the Intel Core 3 N355, with a deltaPct of 0%, meaning their average benchmark scores are nearly identical. The i3-12100F has an avgScore of 13494, while the N355 scores 13492. This suggests that a system with the N355 would produce similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, assuming the GPU is unchanged. The Intel Core i5-9500 is also very close, with a deltaPct of 0.3% (score of 13452), indicating that older six-core processors from Intel's 9th Gen would be nearly equivalent in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core 5 120UL (13594, -0.7%) and Intel Core i7-1250U (13351, 1.1%) are also within a few percentage points, though the latter is a mobile chip that might have different thermal behavior.
For the Intel Arc B580, the nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, with a deltaPct of -0.2% (avgScore 23061 vs 23021 for the B580). This is a fascinating comparison because the RX 580 2048SP is an older GPU with significantly less VRAM and bandwidth, yet its average benchmark score is nearly identical. In practice, the B580's 12 GB of VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth would likely give it an edge at higher resolutions, but the raw compute scores suggest similar rasterization performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, 0.6%) is also a close match, which is surprising given its age but reflects the B580's mid-range positioning. The RTX 3080 (23172, -0.7%) is slightly faster on average, but the deltaPct is small enough that in-game performance would be comparable, especially if the CPU is the bottleneck. The NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, -1%) is another mining-oriented card that ranks similarly, but its lack of display outputs would make it impractical for gaming.
These rival comparisons indicate that the i3-12100F + Arc B580 combo sits in a performance tier where small percentage differences in synthetic benchmarks translate to minor FPS variations in real games. The data suggests that swapping the CPU for an i5-9500 or the GPU for an RTX 2080 would yield nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol.
The Verdict
Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol? The verdict by resolution is clear. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS at all four presets, making it fully playable. The best settings at this resolution are Ultra, with an average of 73.9 FPS, which provides the highest visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay. At 2560x1440, the system is playable at High, Medium, and Low settings, but Ultra falls short at 54.6 FPS. The best settings at 1440p are High, with an average of 66.6 FPS, which offers a good balance between visual fidelity and performance. At 3840x2160, only Low settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 70.6 FPS. Medium (54.2 FPS), High (43.3 FPS), and Ultra (35.7 FPS) all fail to reach playable frame rates.
The data indicates that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can handle the highest preset with ease. At 1440p, it remains viable but requires turning down settings to High or lower. At 4K, the system is only marginally playable at the lowest settings, which will noticeably reduce visual quality. For users with a 4K monitor, this setup would be a compromise, as the low preset likely sacrifices shadows, textures, and effects that are important in a tactical FPS.
Best Settings per Resolution
Based on the measured FPS data, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution is as follows. At 1920x1080, Ultra settings provide an average of 73.9 FPS, which is the highest preset tested and clears the threshold with a 23.2% margin. At 2560x1440, High settings deliver 66.6 FPS, which is the best playable option, as Ultra drops to 54.6 FPS. At 3840x2160, Low settings are the only playable option, with an average of 70.6 FPS. Medium at 4K falls to 54.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS line.
These recommendations assume that the average FPS is a reliable indicator of playability, but the absence of min FPS data means that brief dips below 60 FPS could occur, especially in fast-paced firefights or when multiple enemies are on screen. At 1080p Ultra, the 73.9 FPS average provides some headroom, but at 1440p High (66.6 FPS), the margin is thinner, and at 4K Low (70.6 FPS), the margin is moderate but the visual compromise is significant.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with high settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 43.3, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only Low settings at 4K produce playable frame rates, with an average of 70.6 FPS.
Q: What is the highest preset available at 1440p that maintains 60 FPS?
A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 66.6 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that clears the threshold. Ultra at 1440p drops to 54.6 FPS, which is not playable.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to the RTX 2080 in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, while the RTX 2080 scores 22895, a deltaPct of 0.6%. This indicates nearly identical average performance in synthetic tests, though real-world game performance may vary.
Q: Is the Intel Core i3-12100F a bottleneck at 1080p?
A: The data suggests the CPU is more influential at 1080p, where the GPU has headroom. The i3-12100F's single-thread score of 893 and 4-thread score of 2859 indicate decent performance, but its max-thread score of 4023 shows limited scaling beyond four cores, which could limit frame rates in CPU-intensive scenes.
Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 108.4, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Does the system have enough VRAM for 4K gaming?
A: The Arc B580 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The data shows that at 4K Low settings, the system achieves 70.6 FPS, indicating that VRAM capacity is not the limiting factor at lower presets. At higher presets, the GPU's compute performance becomes the constraint, not memory.
How This Combo Ranks
Among all tested combos in the benchmark database, this specific pairing of Intel Core i3-12100F and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2793 out of 3714 combinations for Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the 75th percentile (2793/3714), meaning roughly three-quarters of tested system configurations perform better in this game. The rank reflects the mid-range nature of both components: the CPU is a budget quad-core from the 12th Gen, while the GPU is an entry-level Battlemage offering. The data indicates that this combo is not a top-tier performer for Lockdown Protocol, but it is far from the bottom. The rank suggests that users will need to adjust settings or resolution to achieve smooth gameplay, but the system is not fundamentally incapable of running the game.
The combo's ranking is likely dragged down by the CPU's limited core count, as many competing systems in the database feature higher-core-count processors. However, the GPU's 12 GB of VRAM and modern architecture (Xe2-HPG) help at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the 4K Low performance of 70.6 FPS. Overall, this combo is a solid mid-range option for 1080p gaming, a usable choice for 1440p with reduced settings, and a marginal option for 4K at the lowest settings. Users seeking higher performance would need to upgrade either the CPU to a six-core part or the GPU to a higher-tier Arc or RTX card.