Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 62 | 82 | 94 | 133 |
| 1440p QHD | 96 | 127 | 146 | 206 |
| 1080p Full HD | 130 | 174 | 199 | 280 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combination delivers a broad spectrum of performance in Lockdown Protocol, ranging from a playable 62 FPS at 4K Ultra to a fluid 130 FPS at 1080p Ultra. The data indicates this pairing is capable of handling the game's demands across all tested resolutions and presets, with the GPU generally becoming the primary performance driver as resolution increases. The benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern from the high refresh rate territory at 1080p to the more demanding 4K environment, where the frame rate drops significantly but remains above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination shows exceptional headroom. The Low preset reaches an average of 280 FPS, which is the highest recorded frame rate in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 199 FPS, with the minimum and maximum recorded at 169 FPS and 229 FPS respectively. The High preset delivers 174 FPS on average, while the Ultra preset still manages a strong 130 FPS. These numbers suggest that at 1080p, the system is almost never constrained by the hardware, as even the most demanding preset offers more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains impressive but shows a more pronounced impact from the increased pixel count. The Low preset averages 206 FPS, which is still exceptionally high. Medium settings produce an average of 146 FPS, with a minimum of 124 FPS and a maximum of 168 FPS. The High preset delivers 127 FPS on average. Ultra settings at this resolution provide 96 FPS, which is a substantial 34 FPS drop from the 1080p Ultra result. This indicates that while the resolution increase does take a toll, the hardware still has significant performance to spare.
The 3840x2160 results reveal where the system begins to feel the pressure. Low settings yield an average of 133 FPS, which is still very playable. Medium settings drop to 94 FPS, with a minimum of 80 FPS and a maximum of 108 FPS. The High preset averages 82 FPS. Ultra settings at 4K produce the lowest result in the dataset at 62 FPS on average. This final number is just above the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting that 4K Ultra is the boundary of this system's comfortable performance envelope for Lockdown Protocol.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU benchmarks place the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D in a tight cluster with several other processors. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755, has an average score of 75738, which is only 0.1% behind the 9950X3D's 75779. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D is similarly close with a score of 75716, also a 0.1% delta. The AMD EPYC 8224P trails by 0.3% with a score of 75582, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 shows a 0.4% difference with a score of 75488. These marginal deltas indicate that in synthetic multi-threaded workloads, the 9950X3D offers essentially identical performance to these alternatives, meaning users upgrading from any of these would see negligible difference in CPU-bound scenarios.
For the GPU, the Radeon RX 7900 XT's benchmark positioning is more varied against its nearest rivals. The AMD Radeon 660M shows a score of 13812, which is 0.5% higher than the RX 7900 XT's 13745. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile also posts a 0.5% higher score at 13821. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon RX 570X is 0.9% ahead with a score of 13871. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is the only rival that trails, with a score of 13543, which is 1.5% lower. These small percentage differences suggest that in pure compute benchmarks, the RX 7900 XT is very closely matched with a wide range of other GPUs, some of which are from different market segments entirely.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a shifting balance between CPU and GPU influence depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low and Ultra presets is 150 FPS (280 FPS vs 130 FPS), which is a 46.4% reduction. This large spread suggests that the GPU is not fully utilized at lower settings, allowing the CPU to push frame rates to very high levels. The system behaves as if CPU-bound at 1080p Low, given the 280 FPS result, but as settings increase, the GPU load becomes more significant.
At 2560x1440, the Low to Ultra spread narrows to 110 FPS (206 FPS vs 96 FPS). The percentage drop from Low to Ultra is 46.6%, which is remarkably similar to the 1080p scaling. This consistency indicates that the relative performance scaling between presets is stable across these two resolutions, suggesting that both components are scaling proportionally with the workload increase.
The 3840x2160 results tell a different story. The Low to Ultra spread here is 71 FPS (133 FPS vs 62 FPS), which represents a 53.4% reduction. The larger percentage drop at 4K indicates that the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck at this resolution. The CPU's role diminishes as the pixel fill rate demand increases, and the RX 7900 XT's compute capabilities become the limiting factor. The fact that 4K Ultra drops to 62 FPS, while 1440p Ultra maintains 96 FPS, strongly suggests that the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K Ultra settings?
A: Yes, the average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 62 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the most demanding configuration tested, and it just barely clears the playability requirement.
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combination?
A: The highest average FPS is 280, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the dataset that exceeds 200 FPS on average.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?
A: The average FPS drops from 130 at 1920x1080 Ultra to 62 at 3840x2160 Ultra. This represents a 68 FPS reduction, or a 52.3% decrease in average frame rate.
Q: Which component is more important for this game at 4K resolution?
A: The GPU is the primary factor at 3840x2160. The percentage drop from Low to Ultra is 53.4% at 4K, compared to 46.6% at 1440p and 46.4% at 1080p, indicating the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as resolution increases.
Q: Are the minimum FPS values recorded at Medium settings still playable?
A: Yes, the minimum FPS at Medium settings are 169 FPS at 1080p, 124 FPS at 1440p, and 80 FPS at 4K. All of these values are well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: How does this system compare to the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT in GPU benchmarks?
A: The RX 7900 XT has an average benchmark score of 13745, which is 1.5% higher than the RX 9070 XT's score of 13543. This makes the RX 7900 XT slightly faster in synthetic tests.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which delivers an average of 130 FPS. This is the most demanding preset available, and it maintains a frame rate that is more than double the 60 FPS threshold. The system has so much headroom at this resolution that users could enable any preset without concern for playability.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset remains the best option, providing an average of 96 FPS. This is a strong performance level for 1440p gaming, with the frame rate comfortably above the playable threshold. The 96 FPS average suggests that even demanding scenes with high action would likely remain smooth.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset still achieves the best settings designation with an average of 62 FPS. This is the only resolution where the Ultra preset dips close to the 60 FPS threshold. While it is technically playable, the 62 FPS average leaves less room for frame rate fluctuations compared to the other resolutions. Users seeking a more consistent experience might prefer High settings, which offer an 82 FPS average.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combination ranks 685th out of 3714 tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol. This places the system in the top 18.4% of all tested configurations. The ranking reflects that while this is a high-end setup, there are many other combinations that deliver higher frame rates in this game. The 685th position suggests that the hardware is very capable, but not at the absolute top tier for this specific title. The large number of combinations above it indicates that Lockdown Protocol can benefit from even more powerful GPUs, particularly at 4K resolution where the RX 7900 XT appears to be the limiting factor.
The Verdict
This PC can run Lockdown Protocol at all tested settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold with the Ultra preset achieving 130 FPS, providing a highly responsive experience. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers 96 FPS, which is well above the playable threshold and suitable for high refresh rate monitors. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 62 FPS, which just meets the 60 FPS playability requirement. The data shows that this combination is fully capable of running the game at its maximum visual quality across all resolutions, though 4K Ultra offers the least performance headroom. For users prioritizing frame rate stability over visual fidelity at 4K, the High preset at 82 FPS would provide a more comfortable margin above the threshold.