Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
219 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
104 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
160 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
73 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
106 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
51 FPS
7.5ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 75,779
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 22,549

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 51 64 71 106
1440p QHD 73 97 112 160
1080p Full HD 104 133 156 219

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 133
1920x1080 Low 219
1920x1080 Medium 156
1920x1080 Ultra 104
2560x1440 High 97
2560x1440 Low 160
2560x1440 Medium 112
2560x1440 Ultra 73
3840x2160 High 64
3840x2160 Low 106
3840x2160 Medium 71
3840x2160 Ultra 51

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT presents a compelling dataset for Lockdown Protocol, a fast-paced FPS. Benchmark results show this combination delivers high frame rates across most settings, though it encounters a clear performance ceiling at 4K Ultra. The data indicates a system that is heavily capable at 1080p and 1440p, with predictable scaling that highlights the GPU as the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the combo averages 64.2 FPS on High settings, which is the most demanding playable preset at this resolution. Dropping to Medium yields an average of 70.7 FPS, while Low settings push the average to 105.5 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the playable threshold, averaging 50.7 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is 13.5 FPS, indicating a significant jump in rendering load that this GPU cannot fully sustain at 4K.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance picture improves substantially. The Ultra preset averages 73.3 FPS, comfortably clearing the 60 FPS threshold. High settings deliver 96.8 FPS, Medium reaches 111.7 FPS, and Low peaks at 159.9 FPS. The scaling from High to Ultra at this resolution is a 23.5 FPS drop, showing that the Ultra preset still imposes a noticeable cost, but the headroom is sufficient for smooth gameplay.

At 1920x1080, the combo is exceptionally strong. Ultra settings average 103.8 FPS, High settings reach 133.2 FPS, and Medium hits 156 FPS. Low settings produce an average of 218.7 FPS, which is more than triple the 60 FPS playability threshold. The difference between Medium and Low is 62.7 FPS, suggesting that even at 1080p, the CPU and GPU combination has significant untapped potential when settings are reduced. Across all resolutions, the data shows no min or max FPS values, so the analysis relies solely on average performance, which consistently indicates high frame delivery.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 1480th out of 3714 tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the 60th percentile of all tested systems. This position suggests that while the hardware is not at the absolute top tier for this game, it outperforms the majority of configurations. The CPU’s percentile versus all CPUs is 95, indicating it is in the top 5% of processors tested, while the GPU’s percentile versus all GPUs is 67, meaning it is above average but not elite. This disparity is telling: the processor is a top-tier part, but the graphics card holds the combination back from ranking higher.

The rank of 1480 implies that many other combos, likely those with higher-end GPUs, achieve better average frame rates. However, the data also shows that the Ryzen 9 9950X3D’s strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42018, ensures the system does not suffer from CPU bottlenecks in most scenarios. The combination’s position in the middle of the pack is a direct result of the RX 7700 XT’s mid-range standing, as reflected in its 67th percentile GPU score. For a game like Lockdown Protocol, which appears to scale well with GPU power, this rank is a reasonable indicator of overall performance capability.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in component responsibility as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s role is more prominent. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D’s high single-thread score of 1292 in 3DMark and its 3DMark 2-thread score of 2549 suggest it can feed frames quickly, allowing the RX 7700 XT to reach 218.7 FPS on Low settings. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is a 114.9 FPS drop, which is substantial, but the CPU’s capability ensures the GPU is the limiting factor even at Ultra.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to dominate. The average FPS on Low settings drops from 218.7 at 1080p to 159.9 at 1440p, a reduction of 58.8 FPS. This indicates that the increased pixel count is taxing the RX 7700 XT more heavily. The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads, while powerful, are not the primary constraint here; the GPU’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are being utilized more intensively. The data shows that at 1440p, the performance gap between presets narrows, with Ultra at 73.3 FPS and Low at 159.9 FPS, a difference of 86.6 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The Ultra preset falls to 50.7 FPS, below the playable threshold, while even High settings only manage 64.2 FPS. The scaling from 1440p Ultra (73.3 FPS) to 4K Ultra (50.7 FPS) is a 22.6 FPS drop, which is significant. The CPU’s 3DMark max threads score of 17184 shows it has ample headroom, but the RX 7700 XT’s 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance is insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K with maximum settings. This pattern confirms that the GPU is the deciding factor for this game at higher resolutions, while the CPU ensures consistent frame delivery at lower ones.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol? The answer is yes, with caveats at the highest resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on all presets, with Ultra averaging 103.8 FPS. This makes it fully playable with maximum settings. At 2560x1440, the combo also clears 60 FPS on all presets, including Ultra at 73.3 FPS, providing a smooth experience with high visual fidelity. At 3840x2160, the situation changes: High, Medium, and Low settings all average above 60 FPS, with High at 64.2 FPS, Medium at 70.7 FPS, and Low at 105.5 FPS. However, Ultra drops to 50.7 FPS, failing to meet the 60 FPS threshold.

Based on the verdict data, the best playable setting at 4K is High, which maintains an average of 64.2 FPS. For those prioritizing frame rate over visual quality, Medium offers a safer margin at 70.7 FPS. The system is unequivocally capable of running the game, but the 4K Ultra preset is not viable for a 60 FPS experience. The data suggests that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it excels even on the most demanding settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU provide context for how other processors would behave in this combo. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 has an average score of 75738, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 9 9950X3D’s 75779. This indicates nearly identical multi-threaded performance, meaning a system with this CPU and the RX 7700 XT would deliver essentially the same frame rates. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, with an average score of 75716, is also 0.1% lower, showing similar parity. The AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75582, a 0.3% difference, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75488, a 0.4% difference. These CPUs would all produce nearly indistinguishable results in this game, as the performance delta is negligible.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are equally close. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile has an average score of 22435, which is 0.5% lower than the RX 7700 XT’s 22549. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22729, a -0.8% difference, meaning it is slightly faster. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, a -1.5% difference, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 scores 22170, a 1.7% difference. In practice, swapping the RX 7700 XT for any of these GPUs would result in frame rates within a few percent of the measured values. For example, the RTX 4060 Mobile might push the 4K Ultra average from 50.7 FPS to roughly 51.1 FPS, still below the 60 FPS threshold. The similarity in scores means the overall verdict would remain unchanged: playable at 4K High, and fully playable at lower resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with maximum settings?

A: No. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 50.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best 4K setting is High, which averages 64.2 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 73.3 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most demanding setting that remains playable at this resolution.

Q: How much faster is the combo at 1080p compared to 4K on Low settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 218.7. At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average FPS is 105.5. This represents a 113.2 FPS difference, showing a significant performance drop with the increase in resolution.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to bottleneck this system in Lockdown Protocol?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU’s high benchmark scores, such as its 95th percentile ranking, show it has ample headroom, while the GPU’s 67th percentile ranking and the sharp FPS drops at 4K point to it as the limiting factor.

Q: Does the system meet the 60 FPS threshold at 1080p on all presets?

A: Yes. All presets at 1920x1080 average above 60 FPS, with the lowest being Ultra at 103.8 FPS. The system exceeds the threshold by a wide margin at this resolution.

Q: What is the average FPS difference between High and Ultra at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, High averages 96.8 FPS, while Ultra averages 73.3 FPS. The difference is 23.5 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset carries a notable performance cost but remains playable.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 64.2 FPS. This provides a playable experience, though the margin above the threshold is slim. For users who want more headroom, Medium at 70.7 FPS is a viable alternative.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, averaging 73.3 FPS. This allows for the highest visual quality while maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that this resolution offers the best balance of fidelity and performance.

At 1920x1080, Ultra settings are recommended, with an average of 103.8 FPS. This preset delivers excellent visual quality while staying well above the playability threshold, making it the optimal choice for this resolution. The system has enough performance headroom to handle the most demanding settings without compromise.