Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 59 | 66 | 95 |
| 1440p QHD | 65 | 93 | 102 | 146 |
| 1080p Full HD | 92 | 122 | 145 | 202 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination delivers a wide spread of frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, heavily dependent on the resolution and quality preset selected. The measured data shows a system that can comfortably handle high refresh rates at 1080p, remains very capable at 1440p, and only begins to struggle at the most demanding 4K Ultra setting. The benchmark results indicate a clear hierarchy where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution scales upward, while the powerful 16-core CPU ensures that even the lowest preset at 1080p produces frame rates exceeding 200 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination of the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and RX 6750 XT produces exceptional results across all presets. The Low preset yields an average of 202.2 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded for this pairing. Moving up to Medium, the average drops to 144.7 FPS, still well above any competitive threshold. The High preset maintains a strong 122 FPS average, while the most demanding Ultra preset delivers 91.5 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system has substantial headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors, with even the Ultra preset nearly doubling the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance remains impressive but shows the expected decline as pixel count increases. The Low preset achieves 146.3 FPS, which is a significant 55.9 FPS reduction compared to the same preset at 1080p. Medium follows at 102.1 FPS, while High drops to 92.9 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p produces 65.4 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an average reduction of roughly 35-40% across presets, indicating that the RX 6750 XT is the primary performance limiter at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the system's limitations become apparent. The Low preset still manages a respectable 95.3 FPS, but Medium falls to 65.7 FPS, and High drops further to 59.4 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K produces only 41.6 FPS, which is well below the playability threshold. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 53.7 FPS, demonstrating the substantial impact of quality settings on the GPU at this resolution. Notably, the 4K High preset at 59.4 FPS is the only measured configuration that falls below the 60 FPS threshold among all resolution and setting combinations tested.
How This Combo Ranks
The comboRankInGame field places this specific CPU-GPU pairing at rank 1812 out of 3714 tested combinations. This positions the system in the upper-middle tier of all configurations tested for Lockdown Protocol. The percentile position suggests that while this is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it outperforms the majority of combinations in the database. The ranking reflects the balance between the high-end Ryzen 9 9950X3D processor and the mid-range RX 6750 XT graphics card.
The rank of 1812 out of 3714 means this combination sits at approximately the 51st percentile, indicating that slightly more than half of all tested configurations perform better overall. This is an interesting result given the CPU's exceptional benchmark scores, which place it in the 95th percentile against all CPUs. The discrepancy between the CPU's high percentile and the combo's mid-tier rank suggests that the GPU is holding back the overall system performance in Lockdown Protocol. The RX 6750 XT's 71st percentile against all GPUs is notably lower than the CPU's ranking, confirming that the graphics card is the limiting factor in this pairing.
The data shows that the combination's rank is determined by the weakest link in the chain. While the Ryzen 9 9950X3D provides exceptional processing power, the RX 6750 XT cannot fully utilize that power at higher resolutions. This is evident in the FPS scaling patterns, where the CPU's influence diminishes as resolution increases and the GPU becomes the dominant performance factor.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in component importance as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a significant role, as evidenced by the substantial FPS differences between presets. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 110.7 FPS, indicating that the CPU can feed the GPU with enough data to maintain high frame rates even at lower quality settings. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D's 16 cores and 32 threads, along with its 128 MB of L3 cache, provide ample processing headroom for the game's computational demands.
At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to assert more influence over performance. The FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 80.9 FPS, which is smaller than at 1080p but still substantial. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows that the RX 6750 XT's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth become more critical as the pixel count increases. The GPU's RDNA 2.0 architecture with 2560 shading units handles the additional load reasonably well, maintaining playable frame rates across all presets.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant factor. The FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 53.7 FPS, and the performance drops more dramatically as settings increase. The RX 6750 XT's 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K with demanding settings. The CPU's role diminishes significantly at this resolution, as the GPU becomes saturated and cannot process frames fast enough to take advantage of the processor's capabilities. The data indicates that upgrading the GPU would yield greater performance gains at 4K, while the CPU's impact is most pronounced at 1080p.
The Verdict
The verdictByResolution data provides a clear answer: this system can run Lockdown Protocol at playable frame rates in the vast majority of configurations. At 1920x1080, all four presets achieve average FPS above the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset delivering 91.5 FPS. This makes 1080p the optimal resolution for this combination, offering smooth gameplay even at maximum quality settings.
At 2560x1440, the system maintains playability across all presets. The Ultra preset produces 65.4 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold with a small margin. The High preset at 92.9 FPS and Medium at 102.1 FPS provide more comfortable headroom for demanding scenes. The Low preset at 146.3 FPS offers exceptional performance for competitive play. This resolution represents a sweet spot for the combination, balancing visual quality with performance.
At 3840x2160, the system can run the game but with limitations. The Low preset at 95.3 FPS and Medium at 65.7 FPS are both playable, but High at 59.4 FPS falls just short of the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 41.6 FPS is not recommended for smooth gameplay. For 4K gaming, users should stick to Medium or Low settings to maintain playable frame rates.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearestRivals data for the CPU provides context for what other processors would deliver similar performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75738 in average benchmark, which is a mere 0.1% difference from the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's 75779. The Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D also sits at 75716, another 0.1% delta. These CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, making them viable alternatives for users seeking similar CPU performance.
The AMD EPYC 8224P at 75582 (0.3% delta) and Intel Core Ultra 9 285 at 75488 (0.4% delta) round out the closest CPU rivals. While these are different platforms, the benchmark data suggests they would not create noticeable performance differences in this game. The minimal deltas across these four CPUs indicate that the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's performance is well-matched by several alternatives.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals show more interesting comparisons. The AMD Radeon R9 M395X at 25891 (0.5% delta) and AMD FirePro W7100 at 25856 (0.6% delta) are within 1% of the RX 6750 XT's 26011 average score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile at 25740 (1.1% delta) is the closest mobile alternative, suggesting that laptop users could expect similar performance from that GPU. These alternatives would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, making them reasonable substitutes for the RX 6750 XT.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on 4K Ultra settings?
A: No. The measured data shows 41.6 FPS average at 3840x2160 Ultra, which is well below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The best playable 4K setting is Medium at 65.7 FPS.
Q: What is the highest quality preset that maintains 60 FPS at 2560x1440?
A: The Ultra preset at 1440p achieves 65.4 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. All four presets at this resolution are playable, with High at 92.9 FPS and Medium at 102.1 FPS providing additional headroom.
Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its nearest rival?
A: The Ryzen 9 9950X3D has an average benchmark score of 75779, which is only 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 at 75738. The performance difference is negligible in practical terms.
Q: Is the GPU the limiting factor at 1440p?
A: Yes. The data shows that FPS drops significantly from 1080p to 1440p, with the Low preset falling from 202.2 FPS to 146.3 FPS. This indicates the RX 6750 XT's rendering capabilities are the primary constraint at this resolution.
Q: What 4K settings are playable with this combination?
A: The Low preset at 95.3 FPS and Medium preset at 65.7 FPS are both playable at 3840x2160. The High preset at 59.4 FPS is marginally below the 60 FPS threshold and should be avoided if strict 60 FPS is required.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?
A: It ranks 1812 out of 3714 combinations tested for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all systems evaluated.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Medium, which produces an average of 65.7 FPS. The Low preset at 95.3 FPS offers more headroom for demanding scenes, but Medium provides the best balance of visual quality and performance at 4K.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves 65.4 FPS and is the most demanding playable option. This allows users to experience maximum visual quality at 1440p while staying above the 60 FPS threshold. For users who prefer higher frame rates, the High preset at 92.9 FPS or Medium at 102.1 FPS are excellent alternatives.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 91.5 FPS, making it the clear choice for maximum quality at this resolution. The system has enough performance headroom that even the most demanding settings remain well above the playability threshold. Users with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors could also consider the High preset at 122 FPS or Medium at 144.7 FPS to better match their display's refresh rate.