Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

95%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
194 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
90 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
138 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
68 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
88 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
44 FPS
8.5ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 75,779
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 27,425

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 44 55 63 88
1440p QHD 68 88 102 138
1080p Full HD 90 118 137 194

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 118
1920x1080 Low 194
1920x1080 Medium 137
1920x1080 Ultra 90
2560x1440 High 88
2560x1440 Low 138
2560x1440 Medium 102
2560x1440 Ultra 68
3840x2160 High 55
3840x2160 Low 88
3840x2160 Medium 63
3840x2160 Ultra 44

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT combination delivers a playable experience in Lockdown Protocol across all tested resolutions, but the margin of safety varies sharply. At 1080p and 1440p, the system clears 60 FPS on every preset, including Ultra. At 4K, the Ultra preset falls below the playable threshold, making Medium the highest playable setting. The data indicates a system that is strongly CPU-capable but GPU-limited at higher resolutions, a pattern consistent with the RX 6700 XT's 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs.

Best Settings per Resolution

The benchmark data for Lockdown Protocol shows that the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS depends heavily on resolution. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 89.5 FPS on the Ultra preset, which is the highest visual quality available. This is a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS playable threshold, leaving headroom for demanding scenes. The High preset at 1080p yields 117.7 FPS, while Medium and Low reach 137.3 and 194.1 FPS respectively, but Ultra remains the best choice for maximum fidelity without sacrificing playability.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Ultra preset still clears the threshold, delivering an average of 68 FPS. This is the best settings option at this resolution, as it provides the full visual experience while staying 8 FPS above the playable minimum. The High preset at 1440p runs at 87.5 FPS, Medium at 101.6 FPS, and Low at 137.8 FPS. The 1440p Ultra result is notably close to the 4K High result in relative terms, suggesting that the GPU is approaching its limits as pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes decisively. The Ultra preset drops to 43.5 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS threshold and not playable by the database's standard. The High preset at 4K manages 55.4 FPS, still short of playable. Medium is the highest playable setting, averaging 63.4 FPS. Low at 4K achieves 88.1 FPS. The verdict data confirms this: Medium is listed as the best playable setting at 4K, with an average of 63.4 FPS. The jump from Medium to High at 4K represents a 12.6% performance cost, which pushes the system under 60 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and the RX 6700 XT. At 1920x1080, the CPU's strength is evident: the Ultra preset runs at 89.5 FPS, and even the most demanding settings stay far above 60 FPS. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D, with its 16 cores and 32 threads, ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, and its benchmark scores (e.g., 42018 in Cinebench R23 multicore) suggest it is not the bottleneck here. The GPU, however, is the limiting factor as resolution increases.

The data shows that dropping from Ultra to Low at 1080p increases FPS from 89.5 to 194.1, a 117% improvement. This massive scaling indicates that the GPU is heavily taxed even at 1080p Ultra, but the CPU can feed it enough frames to maintain high averages. At 1440p, the same preset change yields an increase from 68 to 137.8 FPS, a 103% gain. At 4K, the scaling is less dramatic but still significant: from 43.5 FPS on Ultra to 88.1 FPS on Low, a 103% improvement.

The GPU's role becomes dominant at 4K. The RX 6700 XT, with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 192-bit bus, delivers 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its benchmark scores (e.g., 19786 in Passmark G3D) place it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. At 4K Ultra, the GPU cannot sustain 60 FPS, and even High falls short at 55.4 FPS. This is a classic GPU-bound scenario. Conversely, at 1080p, the CPU's high single-thread performance (2259 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that the GPU is the primary constraint, but the combination still produces frame rates well above the threshold.

The transition from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows a consistent FPS drop across all presets, but the rate of decline accelerates at higher settings. For example, at Ultra, FPS drops from 89.5 at 1080p to 68 at 1440p (a 24% reduction), then to 43.5 at 4K (a 36% reduction from 1440p). This pattern confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU's ample headroom (95th percentile) means it rarely constrains performance.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals in benchmark scores are all within a narrow band. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75738, a delta of 0.1% from the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's 75779 average. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D is similarly close at 75716 (0.1% delta). The AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75582 (0.3% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75488 (0.4% delta). In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, as the game's performance at 1080p and 1440p is not CPU-limited. The differences among these processors are within the margin of measurement noise.

For the GPU, the RX 6700 XT's nearest rivals show a similar clustering. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile scores 27435, a 0.0% delta from the RX 6700 XT's 27425 average. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 scores 27565, which is 0.5% higher. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell scores 27135 (1.1% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27839 (1.5% higher). In Lockdown Protocol, these GPUs would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates. For instance, the RTX 3090's slight 0.5% advantage would translate to roughly 0.3 FPS at 4K Ultra (43.5 FPS baseline), which is imperceptible. The practical takeaway is that swapping the RX 6700 XT for any of these rivals would not change the playability verdict at any resolution.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: this PC can run Lockdown Protocol at 1080p and 1440p with full visual quality, and at 4K with reduced settings. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 89.5 FPS, which is 49% above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 68 FPS, still comfortably playable. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset fails at 43.5 FPS, and High is also below threshold at 55.4 FPS. The best playable setting at 4K is Medium, which averages 63.4 FPS.

The verdict by resolution confirms this analysis. For 3840x2160, the playable settings are Low and Medium, with Medium being the best at 63.4 FPS. For 2560x1440, all four settings (High, Low, Medium, Ultra) are playable, with Ultra at 68 FPS. For 1920x1080, all settings are playable, with Ultra at 89.5 FPS. This means the system is fully capable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and it can handle 4K if the user accepts Medium quality. The RX 6700 XT's 12 GB of VRAM is sufficient for these settings, as the data shows no memory-related stalling.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 43.5, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable 4K setting is Medium, which averages 63.4 FPS.

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 68 FPS, making it the highest playable setting. All other presets (High, Medium, Low) also exceed 60 FPS, with averages of 87.5, 101.6, and 137.8 FPS respectively.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 9 9950X3D has an average benchmark score of 75779. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755, scores 75738, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75716) and AMD EPYC 8224P (75582) are similarly close, with deltas of 0.1% and 0.3% respectively.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the CPU is not the bottleneck; the Ryzen 9 9950X3D ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is more constrained, as evidenced by the large FPS jump from Ultra (89.5 FPS) to Low (194.1 FPS), but the system still delivers playable frame rates on all presets.

Q: What GPU models perform similarly to the RX 6700 XT?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has an average score of 27435, a 0.0% delta from the RX 6700 XT's 27425. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 scores 27565 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27839 (1.5% higher). These would produce nearly identical FPS in Lockdown Protocol.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS on High settings at 4K?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 55.4, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. Only Low (88.1 FPS) and Medium (63.4 FPS) are playable at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT ranks 1932 out of 3714 total combos. This places it in the 48th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly half of the configurations tested perform better and half perform worse. The ranking reflects the GPU's mid-tier position: the RX 6700 XT sits in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 95th percentile. The combination's rank is dragged down by the GPU, which is the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

The rank of 1932 suggests that while the CPU is top-tier, the overall system performance is average among tested combos. This is consistent with the measured FPS data: the system is excellent at 1080p and 1440p, but falls short of the top tier at 4K where more powerful GPUs would excel. The data indicates that users seeking higher 4K performance would need a stronger GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to support it. The 48th percentile rank is a fair summary of a system that delivers strong 1080p and 1440p performance but is not optimized for 4K Ultra gaming.