Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

73%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
280 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
130 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
206 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
96 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
133 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
62 FPS
5.7ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 54,762
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 13,745

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 62 82 94 133
1440p QHD 96 127 146 206
1080p Full HD 130 174 199 280

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 174
1920x1080 Low 280
1920x1080 Medium 199
1920x1080 Ultra 130
2560x1440 High 127
2560x1440 Low 206
2560x1440 Medium 146
2560x1440 Ultra 96
3840x2160 High 82
3840x2160 Low 133
3840x2160 Medium 94
3840x2160 Ultra 62

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Measured FPS Breakdown

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combination delivers strong frame rates across all tested resolutions, with the data showing a clear progression from 4K down to 1080p. At 3840x2160, the combo averages 82 FPS on High settings, 94 FPS on Medium, 133 FPS on Low, and 62 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset at 4K is the only configuration with complete min/max data, showing a minimum of 80 FPS and a maximum of 108 FPS, indicating that even the lower bound stays comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales upward substantially. High settings produce an average of 127 FPS, Medium reaches 146 FPS, Low jumps to 206 FPS, and Ultra maintains a solid 96 FPS average. The Medium preset at 1440p shows a minimum of 124 FPS and a maximum of 168 FPS, which represents the tightest frame time consistency in this resolution tier.

At 1920x1080, the combo becomes almost overkill for this title. High settings average 174 FPS, Medium averages 199 FPS, Low reaches 280 FPS, and Ultra still delivers 130 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p has a minimum of 169 FPS and a maximum of 229 FPS, demonstrating that even the worst-case frame drops remain far above what most displays can show. The delta between Low and Ultra at each resolution is substantial: at 4K the gap is 71 FPS, at 1440p it is 110 FPS, and at 1080p it is 150 FPS. This scaling pattern suggests the game is heavily influenced by preset quality, with Low settings unlocking significantly higher headroom for high-refresh-rate displays.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination ranks 685th out of 3,714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the top 18.5% of all configurations evaluated. This is a strong showing, though not an elite one — the data indicates that many other combos achieve higher frame rates in this particular title, likely due to the game's responsiveness to raw GPU throughput and CPU single-thread performance.

When contextualizing this rank, the CPU's percentileVsAllCpus of 91 means the Ryzen 9 9900X3D outperforms 91% of all CPUs in general benchmark suites, while the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus of 55 places the RX 7900 XT in the upper half of all GPUs but not near the top. The disparity between these two percentiles is notable: the processor is clearly a top-tier part, while the graphics card is mid-pack relative to the full GPU landscape. In Lockdown Protocol specifically, the combo's 685th rank out of 3,714 suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor for achieving higher overall positions, since many combos above this one likely pair stronger GPUs with comparable or weaker CPUs.

The measured FPS data reinforces this interpretation. At 4K Ultra, the combo averages 62 FPS, which is exactly at the playable threshold — a marginal result that would be pushed higher with a more powerful GPU. At 1080p Ultra, the 130 FPS average is respectable but not exceptional for a high-end pairing. The combo's rank reflects a configuration that is very capable but leaves performance on the table in a game that appears to favor GPU-bound scaling at lower resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages exactly 62 FPS. This is a borderline result — the average meets the threshold, but with no min/max data recorded for Ultra, the frame pacing could dip below 60 in heavy scenes. For a more comfortable margin, High settings at 82 FPS average provide substantial headroom while still delivering near-maximum visual quality.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings average 96 FPS, making it the clear best choice without any concern about hitting the 60 FPS floor. The 1440p Ultra result is 34 FPS higher than the 4K Ultra result, showing that the resolution drop from 4K to 1440p provides meaningful performance relief. Medium settings at 146 FPS average offer an alternative for users prioritizing higher refresh rates, with the recorded 124 FPS minimum still well above the playable threshold.

At 1920x1080, Ultra settings average 130 FPS, which is the best settings choice across all resolutions. The 1080p Ultra result is 34 FPS higher than 1440p Ultra and 68 FPS higher than 4K Ultra, demonstrating that this resolution is where the combo can fully flex its capabilities. Even at Ultra, the 130 FPS average is sufficient for 120Hz displays, and the Low preset's 280 FPS average opens the door for 240Hz+ monitors if visual fidelity is sacrificed.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearestRivals data for both components, several configurations would behave similarly to this combo. On the CPU side, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has an average benchmark score of 55,093, which is 0.6% lower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's 54,762 average — essentially a statistical tie. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K scores 54,053, which is 1.3% higher than the AMD part, again within noise margins. The Intel Xeon 6505P at 53,701 is 2% higher, and the Intel Core i7-14700F at 53,620 is 2.1% higher. All four rivals are within a 2.7% band of the Ryzen 9 9900X3D, meaning any of these CPUs paired with the RX 7900 XT would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, particularly at 4K where the GPU dominates.

On the GPU side, the nearestRivals list is more surprising. The AMD Radeon 660M scores 13,812, which is 0.5% higher than the RX 7900 XT's 13,745 average. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile scores 13,821, also 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 570X scores 13,871, 0.9% higher. And the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scores 13,543, which is 1.5% lower than the RX 7900 XT. These deltaPct values are all within 1.5% of the RX 7900 XT, though the inclusion of mobile and older parts in this list suggests the benchmark database's scoring methodology may weight certain workloads differently than Lockdown Protocol does. For this game specifically, the RX 9070 XT is the most relevant comparable — it is 1.5% slower in general benchmarks, which would translate to nearly identical FPS in practice.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear shift in component responsibility as resolution changes. At 3840x2160, the GPU is overwhelmingly the dominant factor. The FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings is 71 FPS (133 vs 62), and the Ultra preset's 62 FPS average sits right at the playable threshold. This pattern indicates that the RX 7900 XT is fully saturated at 4K, with the Ryzen 9 9900X3D having ample headroom to feed frames.

At 2560x1440, the balance begins to shift. The Low-to-Ultra spread widens to 110 FPS (206 vs 96), which suggests the GPU is still the primary constraint but the CPU is starting to contribute more meaningfully. The 62 FPS jump from 4K Ultra to 1440p Ultra (62 to 96) is a 55% improvement, which is consistent with the GPU having to render roughly half the pixels.

At 1920x1080, the CPU's role becomes more pronounced. The Low-to-Ultra spread reaches 150 FPS (280 vs 130), and the Low preset's 280 FPS average approaches what the CPU can sustain in terms of frame generation. The jump from 1440p Ultra to 1080p Ultra (96 to 130) is only 35%, a smaller relative gain than the 4K-to-1440p jump, indicating that the CPU is beginning to limit the upper bound at lower resolutions. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D's strong multi-threaded performance — evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 47,737 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22,884 — ensures it never becomes a severe bottleneck, but the data suggests that at 1080p Low, the game's frame generation is approaching what this CPU can sustain.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160, all four tested presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) average above 60 FPS. Ultra averages 62 FPS, Medium averages 94 FPS, High averages 82 FPS, and Low averages 133 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding playable setting, with an average exactly at the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for maximum visual quality at 1440p?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 average 96 FPS, making it the best choice for visual fidelity while maintaining well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The recorded Medium preset minimum of 124 FPS shows that even lower presets provide excellent frame consistency.

Q: How does this combo compare to the nearest rival GPU in performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is the closest comparable GPU, with an average benchmark score of 13,543 versus the RX 7900 XT's 13,745 — a 1.5% deficit. In Lockdown Protocol, this difference would translate to roughly 1-2 FPS at most settings, making the two effectively interchangeable for this game.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes more influential. The Low preset averages 280 FPS, which approaches the frame generation limits of the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. The 35% FPS improvement from 1440p Ultra to 1080p Ultra (96 to 130) is smaller than the 55% improvement from 4K Ultra to 1440p Ultra (62 to 96), indicating CPU constraints begin to matter at lower resolutions.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 4K with Medium settings?

A: Medium settings at 3840x2160 average 94 FPS, with a minimum of 80 FPS and a maximum of 108 FPS. This is the only 4K preset with complete min/max data, showing that even the worst frame drops remain comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9900X3D compare to the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF in general benchmarks?

A: The two CPUs are essentially tied. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has an average benchmark score of 55,093, which is 0.6% lower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's 54,762. In Lockdown Protocol, this difference would be imperceptible, with both processors delivering nearly identical frame rates when paired with the same GPU.