Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

72%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
260 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
121 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
191 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
89 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
123 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
57 FPS
6.2ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 57,498
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 13,543

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 57 76 87 123
1440p QHD 89 118 135 191
1080p Full HD 121 161 185 260

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 161
1920x1080 Low 260
1920x1080 Medium 185
1920x1080 Ultra 121
2560x1440 High 118
2560x1440 Low 191
2560x1440 Medium 135
2560x1440 Ultra 89
3840x2160 High 76
3840x2160 Low 123
3840x2160 Medium 87
3840x2160 Ultra 57

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT combination delivers a wide range of performance in Lockdown Protocol, with the CPU proving exceptionally strong and the GPU outperforming its modest benchmark percentile in actual gameplay. Data indicates this combo is well-positioned for high-refresh-rate play across all tested resolutions, though the ultra preset at 4K requires a compromise.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Ryzen 9 9900X sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 57,498. Its nearest rivals show remarkably tight clustering: the AMD EPYC 9015 scores 57,555 (a -0.1% delta), the AMD EPYC 7313 scores 57,399 (+0.2%), the Intel Core i9-14900 scores 58,115 (-1.1%), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58,323 (-1.4%). This indicates the 9900X delivers essentially identical multi-threaded performance to these enterprise and high-end desktop parts, with the largest gap being just 1.4%. In gaming workloads, the 9900X’s 12 cores and 24 threads with Zen 5 architecture provide ample headroom, meaning any of these rivals would likely produce similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol when paired with the same GPU.

The RX 9070 XT presents a more unusual picture. Its average benchmark score of 13,543 places it at only the 55th percentile among all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are dramatically older parts: the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (13,536, +0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (13,515, +0.2%), NVIDIA P106-090 (13,470, +0.5%), and AMD Radeon Pro 555 (13,407, +1.0%). These deltas are all under 1%, suggesting the RX 9070 XT’s synthetic benchmark scores are not indicative of its real-world gaming performance. In Lockdown Protocol specifically, the GPU delivers 76 FPS at 4K High and 260 FPS at 1080p Low, which far exceeds what those older rivals could achieve. The benchmark data implies the RX 9070 XT’s architecture excels in gaming workloads that stress its 4096 shading units and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, despite underwhelming generic compute scores.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals how the balance shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU is the dominant factor. The Low preset achieves 260 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 121 FPS — a 139 FPS swing that is almost entirely GPU-limited, since the CPU has massive headroom at this resolution. The Ryzen 9 9900X’s single-thread score of 1,286 in 3DMark and 4,672 in PassMark ensures the CPU never becomes a bottleneck at 1080p, even at the lowest settings where the GPU is pushed to its maximum output.

At 2560x1440, the relationship shifts toward balance. Low preset hits 191 FPS, Medium drops to 135 FPS, High to 118 FPS, and Ultra to 89 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 102 FPS reduction, showing the GPU becomes progressively more involved as resolution increases. At 3840x2160, the GPU clearly dominates. Low preset still achieves 123 FPS, but Ultra falls to 57 FPS — just below the playable threshold. The 4K data shows a 66 FPS difference between Low and Ultra, confirming that the RX 9070 XT’s memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s and pixel rate of 380.2 GPixel/s become the limiting factors at higher settings. The CPU’s role diminishes at 4K, as the GPU struggles to maintain frame rates regardless of CPU headroom.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 260 FPS. Medium produces 185 FPS average with a minimum of 157 and maximum of 212. High reaches 161 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 121 FPS average. Every preset at 1080p comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold, with even the most demanding setting providing double the required frame rate.

At 2560x1440, Low averages 191 FPS. Medium averages 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 and maximum of 156. High achieves 118 FPS average, and Ultra maintains 89 FPS average. The minimum frame rate at Medium (115 FPS) suggests the system sustains smooth performance even in demanding scenes, with no drops below the playable threshold across any preset.

At 3840x2160, Low averages 123 FPS. Medium averages 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 and maximum of 100. High reaches 76 FPS average, while Ultra falls to 57 FPS average — the only preset in the entire dataset that misses the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset’s minimum of 74 FPS indicates the GPU maintains comfortable headroom even at 4K, but Ultra’s 57 FPS average shows the limits of this combination at maximum settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Lockdown Protocol at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 57 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold of 60 FPS. The verdict data confirms Ultra is not listed among playable settings at this resolution.

Q: What is the best 4K preset that stays above 60 FPS?

A: High settings at 3840x2160 produce an average of 76 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that clears the threshold. Low (123 FPS) and Medium (87 FPS) also qualify, but High offers the best visual quality while maintaining playability.

Q: How does the combo perform at 1440p with maximum settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 89, well above the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the recommended preset at this resolution, with all four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) remaining playable.

Q: Is the RX 9070 XT a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data shows the GPU delivers 260 FPS at 1080p Low, but the CPU’s single-thread performance (3DMark score of 1,286) suggests it could push even higher if the GPU allowed. The gap between Low (260 FPS) and Medium (185 FPS) indicates the GPU’s shading units and memory bandwidth limit higher settings, not the CPU.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1440p Medium?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the minimum frame rate is 115 FPS, with a maximum of 156 FPS and an average of 135 FPS. This minimum is nearly double the playable threshold, indicating smooth performance even during intense gameplay sequences.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combination ranks 874th out of 3,714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the top 23.5% of all systems. This rank reflects the CPU’s strong 92nd percentile position and the GPU’s effective gaming performance despite its modest 55th percentile benchmark score.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 874 out of 3,714 tested combinations places it in the upper quartile of all systems tested for Lockdown Protocol. This positioning is noteworthy given the GPU’s low 55th percentile score — the RX 9070 XT’s real-world gaming performance in this title significantly outperforms its synthetic benchmark standing. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking provides a strong foundation, and the measured FPS data shows the system delivers playable performance at every resolution and preset combination except 4K Ultra. The rank suggests that in a game like Lockdown Protocol, which appears to scale well with both CPU and GPU resources, this combo outperforms many systems with nominally higher GPU benchmark scores but weaker CPU performance.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering 121 FPS average — more than double the 60 FPS threshold. All four settings exceed playability, but Ultra provides the highest visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the recommended preset, achieving 89 FPS average. This keeps the frame rate comfortably above 60 FPS while maximizing visual quality, and the 115 FPS minimum at Medium suggests Ultra likely maintains playable minimums as well.

At 3840x2160, High is the optimal preset, producing 76 FPS average. Ultra falls to 57 FPS and fails the playability test, while Low (123 FPS) and Medium (87 FPS) are also viable but offer less visual quality. High strikes the best balance between fidelity and performance at 4K.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol across nearly the entire range of tested configurations. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low (260 FPS), Medium (185 FPS), High (161 FPS), and Ultra (121 FPS) — clear the 60 FPS threshold with substantial margin. At 2560x1440, the same is true: Low (191 FPS), Medium (135 FPS), High (118 FPS), and Ultra (89 FPS) all remain playable. At 3840x2160, three of four presets succeed — Low (123 FPS), Medium (87 FPS), and High (76 FPS) — but Ultra fails at 57 FPS. The verdict data confirms playable settings at 4K are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best option. For 1440p and 1080p, Ultra is fully playable and recommended. The only scenario where this combo cannot deliver 60 FPS is 4K with Ultra settings, which is a minor limitation for an otherwise exceptionally capable gaming system.