Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

64%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
74 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
35 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
25 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
35 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
16 FPS
21.7ms Frame Time
33ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 76,212
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 8,436

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 16 22 25 35
1440p QHD 25 34 39 54
1080p Full HD 35 46 53 74

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 46
1920x1080 Low 74
1920x1080 Medium 53
1920x1080 Ultra 35
2560x1440 High 34
2560x1440 Low 54
2560x1440 Medium 39
2560x1440 Ultra 25
3840x2160 High 22
3840x2160 Low 35
3840x2160 Medium 25
3840x2160 Ultra 16

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX paired with the AMD Radeon 880M integrated graphics presents a peculiar case for Lockdown Protocol. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 powerhouse with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, ranking in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, but the GPU is an integrated part that sits at the 43rd percentile among all GPUs. This combination means the system’s frame rate is entirely dictated by the Radeon 880M’s graphics throughput, not the Ryzen 9’s processing muscle. Benchmark results confirm this split personality: the CPU scores 42,713 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the GPU manages only 7,615 in Passmark G3D. For Lockdown Protocol, a fast-paced FPS, the iGPU becomes the bottleneck, and the measured data below shows exactly where the playable boundary lies.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Lockdown Protocol on this combo is sparse on min/max values but clear on averages. At 3840x2160, the Radeon 880M is overwhelmed. High settings produce an average of 22 FPS, Medium drops to 25 FPS, and Low improves to 35 FPS, but none of these approach playability. Ultra settings at 4K yield just 16 FPS average. The only 4K data point with a min/max range is Medium, which fluctuates between 21 and 29 FPS, showing severe inconsistency that would make aiming difficult. Even the best-case Low preset at 4K sits at 35 FPS, far below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Stepping down to 2560x1440 does not rescue the situation. High settings average 34 FPS, Medium averages 39 FPS with a range of 33 to 44 FPS, and Ultra averages 25 FPS. Low settings at 1440p hit 54 FPS average, which is tantalizingly close to 60 FPS but still short. The frame pacing at Medium (33-44 FPS) suggests noticeable stutter during intense firefights. The data indicates that 1440p is not a viable resolution for maintaining a consistent 60 FPS experience, regardless of quality preset.

At 1920x1080, the picture improves but remains constrained. Low settings deliver a solid 74 FPS average, which clears the 60 FPS threshold comfortably. Medium settings average 53 FPS, with a min of 45 and max of 61 FPS, meaning the frame rate dips below playability during demanding scenes. High settings average 46 FPS, and Ultra averages 35 FPS. The measured data shows a clear pattern: only the Low preset at 1080p consistently stays above 60 FPS, with Medium occasionally touching 61 FPS but frequently falling short. The 74 FPS average at Low suggests headroom for minor dips without dropping below the threshold, making it the only reliable configuration.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearestRivals data, the CPU’s performance is closely matched by several high-end processors. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX scores 76,155, a delta of just 0.1% from the Ryzen 9 8945HX’s 76,212 average benchmark score. The AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX are both 0.4% slower, scoring 76,492 and 76,513 respectively. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is 0.6% faster at 75,779. For frame pacing in Lockdown Protocol, any of these CPUs would deliver identical performance since the GPU is the limiting factor — swapping the processor would not change FPS numbers.

The GPU’s nearest rivals are far more telling. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX scores 8,427, essentially identical to the Radeon 880M’s 8,436 (0.1% delta). The NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is 0.3% slower at 8,458, and the AMD Radeon HD 8870M is also 0.3% slower at 8,462. The AMD Radeon R9 M375X is 1.3% faster at 8,325. These are all older discrete mobile GPUs from a previous generation, meaning the Radeon 880M’s integrated performance is roughly equivalent to a low-end dedicated graphics card from several years ago. In practice, if you have a laptop with a GTX 675MX or MX330, expect similar Lockdown Protocol frame rates at the same settings. The deltaPct values are all under 1.5%, so the gameplay experience would be virtually indistinguishable across these alternatives.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Lockdown Protocol at 4K?

A: No. Measured data shows the highest average at 3840x2160 is 35 FPS on Low settings, with Ultra dropping to 16 FPS. All 4K presets fall far below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1080p?

A: Low settings at 1920x1080 produce a 74 FPS average, which is the only configuration that consistently clears 60 FPS. Medium settings average 53 FPS with a minimum of 45 FPS, so they dip below playability.

Q: How does the Radeon 880M compare to dedicated GPUs?

A: The Radeon 880M scores 8,436 in average benchmarks, placing it within 0.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and MX330. Its performance is comparable to a low-end discrete mobile GPU from several generations ago, not modern gaming hardware.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 8945HX CPU limiting performance in this game?

A: No. The CPU ranks in the 95th percentile and scores 42,713 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Benchmark results indicate the GPU is the bottleneck; the CPU has ample headroom for this title.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p Medium?

A: The measured average is 39 FPS, with a range of 33 to 44 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS threshold and shows noticeable frame pacing issues during demanding scenes.

Q: Are there any settings where 1440p becomes playable?

A: No. Low settings at 2560x1440 average 54 FPS, which is the closest to 60 FPS but still short. All other 1440p presets average 39 FPS or lower, so none meet the playable threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this pairing ranks 3,627 out of 3,714 combos. That places it in the bottom 2.4% of all tested systems, which is consistent with the measured FPS data showing only one playable configuration. The rank is driven almost entirely by the GPU’s low percentile position (43rd) rather than the CPU’s high percentile (95th). For context, the combo ranks below systems with older discrete GPUs like the GTX 675MX, given that the Radeon 880M’s performance is equivalent to those parts but requires system RAM for video memory. This ranking means that among the 3,714 combos tested for Lockdown Protocol, only 87 perform worse — those would be systems with even older integrated graphics or severely underclocked laptops. The data suggests that while the CPU is top-tier, the GPU relegates this combo to near-bottom-tier gaming performance for this specific title.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is unambiguous. At 3840x2160, no settings are playable — the best average is 35 FPS on Low, and Ultra drops to 16 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same story applies: no settings reach the 60 FPS threshold, with Low averaging 54 FPS as the closest attempt. At 1920x1080, exactly one preset is playable: Low settings, which average 74 FPS. This means the system can run Lockdown Protocol, but only at 1080p with the lowest quality preset. The measured data shows that Medium at 1080p averages 53 FPS with a 45 FPS minimum, so it will drop below 60 FPS during gameplay. For a fast-paced FPS, that inconsistency is likely to be noticeable. If you must play at higher resolutions or quality settings, this combo will not deliver a smooth experience. The Ryzen 9 8945HX’s 16 cores and 32 threads are irrelevant here; the Radeon 880M’s 768 shading units and 16 ROPs define the ceiling.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The most demanding preset that comes closest is Low, which averages 35 FPS, but that is still 25 FPS short of playability. There is no recommended setting at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the situation is the same — no preset clears 60 FPS. Low settings average 54 FPS, which is the highest measured value at this resolution, but it remains below the threshold. Medium averages 39 FPS with a 33-44 FPS range. No setting is recommended for 1440p.

At 1920x1080, Low settings are the only playable option, delivering a 74 FPS average. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. Medium settings average 53 FPS, which falls short, so Low is the definitive choice. The 74 FPS average provides a 14 FPS buffer over the 60 FPS threshold, giving some headroom for dips during intense action sequences. There is no data suggesting that any tweaks between Low and Medium would hit 60 FPS, so stick with Low for consistent performance.