Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
155 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
72 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
110 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
52 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
70 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
37 FPS
10.8ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 51,947
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 37 48 51 70
1440p QHD 52 69 79 110
1080p Full HD 72 93 109 155

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 93
1920x1080 Low 155
1920x1080 Medium 109
1920x1080 Ultra 72
2560x1440 High 69
2560x1440 Low 110
2560x1440 Medium 79
2560x1440 Ultra 52
3840x2160 High 48
3840x2160 Low 70
3840x2160 Medium 51
3840x2160 Ultra 37

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + Intel Arc B580 is a combination that lands in the lower-mid tier of tested systems for Lockdown Protocol, ranking 2831 out of 3714 combos. The pairing delivers playable frame rates at 1440p and 1080p, but 4K Ultra is out of reach, requiring a drop to Low settings to stay above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows a system that is consistently capable at mainstream resolutions, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck at higher detail levels.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the combination struggles to maintain smooth gameplay across most presets. Low settings produce an average of 69.8 FPS, which is the only playable option at this resolution. Medium settings drop to 50.9 FPS, High falls further to 48.1 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 37.0 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 18.9 FPS, indicating a steep performance cliff as texture and shading complexity increases.

Moving to 2560x1440, the system shows much stronger results. Low settings hit 110.3 FPS average, Medium manages 78.6 FPS, and High stays comfortably playable at 69.4 FPS. Ultra is the exception, dipping to 52.4 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The transition from Low to High costs roughly 41 FPS, but the system remains fluid through the mid-range presets.

At 1920x1080, every preset clears the 60 FPS bar. Low settings produce 154.7 FPS, Medium delivers 108.8 FPS, High reaches 93.1 FPS, and Ultra still holds at 72.1 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at High settings shows a 23.7 FPS drop (93.1 to 69.4), while moving from 1440p to 4K at High results in another 21.3 FPS loss (69.4 to 48.1). These figures suggest a linear degradation as pixel count rises, with the Arc B580's 12 GB frame buffer and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth becoming increasingly stressed at higher resolutions.

Notably, the data lacks min and max FPS values for all tested configurations, so variance and frame pacing cannot be assessed from this dataset. The average FPS figures alone indicate that 1080p Ultra is the best visual quality setting that remains fluid, while 4K users must accept Low settings for acceptable performance.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU benchmarks place the Ryzen 9 5950X in close competition with several other processors. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073, which is 0.2% higher than the 5950X's 51947 average. The AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121, a 0.3% edge. The Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51730, which is 0.4% lower, and the Intel Core i7-14700 scores 52301, 0.7% higher. These deltas are all within 1%, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver virtually identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, assuming the GPU remains the limiting factor.

On the GPU side, the Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23021 places it near several familiar cards. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, just 0.2% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, which is 0.6% lower. The RTX 3080 scores 23172, only 0.7% above the B580, and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 1.0% higher. These figures suggest that swapping the Arc B580 for any of these GPUs would produce nearly identical FPS in this game, though architectural differences in driver overhead or VRAM management are not captured in these aggregate scores.

For the full combo, a user swapping the 5950X for an i7-14700 while keeping the B580 would see negligible changes, as would swapping the B580 for an RTX 2080 while keeping the 5950X. The nearest rivals cluster so tightly that the measured FPS differences would be within run-to-run variance.

How This Combo Ranks

Out of 3714 tested combinations, this pairing ranks 2831st, placing it in the bottom 24% of systems. The percentile data reinforces this: the CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU is at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The gap between these percentiles indicates that the Arc B580 is the weaker link, holding back what is otherwise a high-end CPU.

The rank of 2831 suggests that most competing systems either pair a slower CPU with a faster GPU or use a more balanced mid-range setup. Given that the 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 3 part with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017, its compute headroom far exceeds what Lockdown Protocol demands at typical settings. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU, as evidenced by the steep FPS drops when moving from Low to Ultra at any resolution.

Compared to the 91st percentile CPU performance, the combo's overall rank is dragged down by the GPU's 68th percentile standing. This mismatch means the system is overbuilt for CPU-bound scenarios but under-equipped for GPU-heavy workloads at high resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Is this combination playable at 4K in Lockdown Protocol?

A: Only at Low settings, where it averages 69.8 FPS. Medium drops to 50.9 FPS, High to 48.1 FPS, and Ultra to 37.0 FPS, all below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best setting at 1440p that stays above 60 FPS?

A: High settings average 69.4 FPS. Medium runs at 78.6 FPS and Low at 110.3 FPS, but High offers the best visual quality while remaining playable. Ultra falls short at 52.4 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle 1080p Ultra?

A: Yes, it averages 72.1 FPS at 1080p Ultra, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. All other 1080p settings also exceed 60 FPS, with Low hitting 154.7 FPS.

Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 3080 in this context?

A: The RTX 3080 has an average benchmark score of 23172, just 0.7% higher than the B580's 23021. In practical terms, the two GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5950X the limiting factor at any resolution?

A: No. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile among all processors, and its nearest rivals (all within 0.7% performance) show that CPU choice has minimal impact. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking is the primary constraint.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p Low?

A: The data shows 110.3 FPS average, which is significantly higher than the High preset's 69.4 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium costs 31.7 FPS, indicating that Low is far less demanding on the GPU.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p Low, the system produces 154.7 FPS. Dropping to 1440p Low reduces this to 110.3 FPS, a 28.7% decrease. Moving to 4K Low further reduces it to 69.8 FPS, a 36.7% drop from 1440p. These reductions align closely with pixel count increases (1.78x from 1080p to 1440p, 2.25x from 1440p to 4K), confirming that the Arc B580's rendering throughput is the limiting factor.

The preset scaling reinforces this. At 4K, the difference between Low and Ultra is 32.8 FPS (69.8 to 37.0), while at 1080p the same preset range costs 82.6 FPS (154.7 to 72.1). The absolute FPS loss is larger at 1080p because the starting point is higher, but the percentage drop is steepest at 4K, where Ultra delivers only 53% of Low's frame rate.

The CPU's role is minimal in this title. The 5950X's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom, and its 3DMark max-threads score of 11597 indicates strong multi-threaded performance that Lockdown Protocol likely does not fully utilize. At lower resolutions and settings, where frame rates exceed 100 FPS, the CPU could theoretically become a factor, but given that the 5950X outperforms 91% of all CPUs, any bottleneck would require a much faster processor than what is commonly available. The data suggests that users should focus GPU upgrades first if seeking higher FPS, as the CPU is unlikely to be a constraint.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which averages 69.8 FPS. Medium (50.9 FPS), High (48.1 FPS), and Ultra (37.0 FPS) all fall below the 60 FPS threshold, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay. Users with 4K displays must accept significant visual compromises to maintain fluid motion.

At 2560x1440, High is the best playable preset, delivering 69.4 FPS. This provides a solid balance of visual fidelity and performance. Medium (78.6 FPS) and Low (110.3 FPS) are also playable but offer diminishing returns on quality. Ultra at 52.4 FPS is not recommended, as it dips below the 60 FPS mark.

At 1920x1080, Ultra is the best setting, averaging 72.1 FPS. This allows users to max out all graphical options while staying comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. High (93.1 FPS), Medium (108.8 FPS), and Low (154.7 FPS) are all viable for users prioritizing higher refresh rates. The 1080p Ultra result is notable because it shows the system can handle maximum detail when resolution is not excessive, making it the ideal target for most users with 1080p panels.