Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 43 | 49 | 71 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 67 | 77 | 107 |
| 1080p Full HD | 71 | 90 | 102 | 148 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
This analysis examines the performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 in Lockdown Protocol, based on measured FPS data. The combination sits at rank 2866 out of 3714 tested combos, placing it in the lower-mid range of the database. The data reveals a system that is highly capable at lower resolutions but struggles under the weight of 4K Ultra settings, making the choice of resolution and preset the single most critical factor for playability.
Best Settings per Resolution
The measured FPS data for Lockdown Protocol shows that the optimal settings are heavily dependent on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system achieves its highest visual fidelity while maintaining the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data shows that the Ultra preset delivers an average of 71 FPS at this resolution, making it the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS. This is a comfortable margin, indicating the GPU has headroom to spare.
Moving to 2560x1440, the situation changes significantly. The Ultra preset drops to an average of 49.6 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold. The data indicates that the High preset is the best choice here, delivering an average of 67.4 FPS. This represents a 17.8 FPS improvement over Ultra, showing that the step down in quality is necessary to maintain smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 76.6 FPS and Low at 106.9 FPS also remain playable, but High offers the best balance of visual quality and performance.
At 3840x2160, the system's limitations become apparent. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, which averages 71.3 FPS. The Medium preset falls to 49.2 FPS, and High drops further to 43.3 FPS, while Ultra plummets to 30.9 FPS. The data clearly shows that 4K gaming with this combo requires significant compromises in visual settings, with only the lowest preset providing a playable experience. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is 22.1 FPS, illustrating how quickly performance degrades as settings increase.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a complex relationship between the CPU and GPU across different resolutions. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, with its 16 cores and 32 threads, provides substantial processing power that is unlikely to be a bottleneck in most scenarios. However, the AMD Radeon RX 6600, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus, appears to be the limiting factor at higher resolutions.
The scaling between resolutions provides insight into where the bottleneck lies. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system achieves 71 FPS. When moving to 2560x1440 at the same Ultra preset, performance drops to 49.6 FPS, a reduction of 21.4 FPS or roughly 30%. This significant drop indicates that the GPU is under increasing stress as pixel count rises. The trend continues at 3840x2160, where Ultra settings yield just 30.9 FPS, a further 18.7 FPS decline from 1440p.
The GPU's role becomes more pronounced when examining the settings scaling at each resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 76.5 FPS (147.5 down to 71), showing that the GPU has enough headroom to handle increased graphical demands. At 1440p, this difference narrows to 57.3 FPS (106.9 to 49.6), and at 4K, it narrows further to 40.4 FPS (71.3 to 30.9). This pattern suggests that as resolution increases, the GPU becomes progressively more saturated, reducing the performance impact of settings changes.
The CPU's contribution is less visible in the data but still relevant. The Ryzen 9 5950X's high single-thread score of 944 in 3dmark_single_thread and multi-thread score of 11597 in 3dmark_max_threads suggest it can feed the GPU efficiently. However, at 4K, the GPU's limitations dominate, and the CPU's power cannot compensate for the RX 6600's bandwidth constraints. The data implies that for this game, the GPU is the primary determinant of performance at all resolutions above 1080p, while at 1080p, the CPU provides enough headroom for the GPU to operate near its full potential.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 2866 out of 3714 tested combinations places it in the 22nd percentile, meaning roughly 78% of tested systems perform better in Lockdown Protocol. This ranking is notable because the CPU itself is highly capable—the Ryzen 9 5950X has a percentileVsAllCpus of 91, placing it in the top 10% of all CPUs. The GPU, however, has a percentileVsAllGpus of 63, which is more modest. The significant gap between the CPU's high percentile and the GPU's mid-range percentile indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing.
The data suggests that this combination is not balanced for this game. The CPU is overqualified relative to the GPU, which means the system's performance is constrained by the RX 6600. This is reflected in the FPS numbers, where the system cannot achieve high frame rates at 4K despite having a top-tier CPU. The rank of 2866 out of 3714 indicates that users would need to upgrade the GPU to see substantial improvements in this game, as the CPU is unlikely to be the bottleneck.
When compared to the average benchmark scores, the combo's performance aligns closely with what would be expected from the GPU's capabilities. The RX 6600's passmark_g3d score of 15096 and 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 1492 place it firmly in the mid-range category. The measured FPS figures in Lockdown Protocol are consistent with this positioning, showing playable performance at 1080p and 1440p with appropriate settings, but struggling at 4K.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearestRivals data provides insight into what other hardware would perform similarly to this CPU and GPU combination. For the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, the closest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX with an average score of 52073 and a deltaPct of -0.2, and the AMD EPYC 8124P with an average score of 52121 and a deltaPct of -0.3. The Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51730 with a deltaPct of 0.4, while the Intel Core i7-14700 scores 52301 with a deltaPct of -0.7. These deltas are all within 1% of the Ryzen 9 5950X's average benchmark score of 51947, meaning users would see virtually identical CPU performance with any of these alternatives.
For the AMD Radeon RX 6600, the nearest rivals are more varied. The NVIDIA Quadro K6000 has an average score of 19030 with a deltaPct of 0, making it essentially equivalent in raw performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 19049 with a deltaPct of -0.1, while the NVIDIA Tesla K20m scores 19089 with a deltaPct of -0.3. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18954 with a deltaPct of 0.4. These GPUs would all deliver similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, though users should note that some are professional or mobile parts that may have different driver support or power characteristics.
The practical implication is that swapping the CPU for any of its nearest rivals would have negligible impact on Lockdown Protocol performance, as the differences are under 1%. Similarly, swapping the GPU for any of its nearest rivals would produce nearly identical FPS numbers. This information is useful for users who already own one of these alternative components and are considering a build similar to the tested combo.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the system shows strong performance across all settings. The Low preset averages 147.5 FPS, which is exceptionally high and suggests the game is not heavily demanding at this resolution. Medium drops to 101.6 FPS, High to 89.8 FPS, and Ultra to 71 FPS. All four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with even the most demanding setting maintaining a comfortable margin.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales predictably. Low averages 106.9 FPS, Medium 76.6 FPS, High 67.4 FPS, and Ultra 49.6 FPS. The drop from Medium to High is 9.2 FPS, while the drop from High to Ultra is 17.8 FPS. This suggests that the Ultra preset introduces a significant performance penalty, likely due to increased shadow quality or post-processing effects that heavily tax the GPU.
At 3840x2160, the performance becomes marginal. Low averages 71.3 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium drops to 49.2 FPS, High to 43.3 FPS, and Ultra to 30.9 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium is 22.1 FPS, indicating a steep performance cliff as settings increase. The gap between Medium and High is smaller at 5.9 FPS, but the gap between High and Ultra is again significant at 12.4 FPS. The data shows that 4K gaming is only viable with the lowest settings for this combo.
The lack of minFps and maxFps data means the analysis relies solely on average FPS. This is a limitation, as it doesn't reveal frame time consistency or potential stuttering. However, the average FPS figures are sufficient to determine playability based on the 60 FPS threshold.
The Verdict
Based on the verdictByResolution data, this PC can run Lockdown Protocol at all three tested resolutions, but with important caveats. At 1920x1080, the system is fully playable at all settings, including Ultra with an average of 71 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this combo, offering the best visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, the system is playable at High, Medium, and Low settings, with High averaging 67.4 FPS. The Ultra preset at 49.6 FPS is not playable, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold. Users who prioritize resolution over visual fidelity can enjoy a good experience at 1440p with High settings.
At 3840x2160, the system is only playable at Low settings, with an average of 71.3 FPS. All other presets—Medium at 49.2 FPS, High at 43.3 FPS, and Ultra at 30.9 FPS—fail to meet the 60 FPS requirement. This makes 4K gaming possible but visually compromised, as users must sacrifice most graphical features to achieve playable performance.
In summary, the Ryzen 9 5950X + RX 6600 combo is a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming system for Lockdown Protocol, but it is not suited for 4K gaming beyond the lowest settings. The CPU provides ample processing power, but the GPU's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus limit its ability to handle high resolutions and demanding settings simultaneously.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on Ultra settings?
A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080, where the Ultra preset averages 71 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 49.6 FPS, and at 3840x2160, Ultra averages 30.9 FPS, both below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Lockdown Protocol?
A: The data indicates that 1920x1080 provides the best experience, as all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) maintain average FPS above 60, with Ultra at 71 FPS offering the highest visual quality.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 9 5950X's average benchmark score of 51947 is within 1% of its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (-0.2%), AMD EPYC 8124P (-0.3%), Intel Core i9-13900F (0.4%), and Intel Core i7-14700 (-0.7%). Performance differences would be negligible in-game.
Q: Is the GPU the bottleneck in this system?
A: The data suggests yes. The CPU has a percentileVsAllCpus of 91, while the GPU has a percentileVsAllGpus of 63. The significant performance drop between 1440p and 4K, and the steep decline in FPS as settings increase at 4K, indicate the GPU is the limiting factor.
Q: What settings should I use for 4K gaming?
A: Only the Low preset is playable at 3840x2160, averaging 71.3 FPS. The Medium preset at 49.2 FPS, High at 43.3 FPS, and Ultra at 30.9 FPS all fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?
A: This combination ranks 2866 out of 3714 total combos, placing it in the 22nd percentile. This low ranking is primarily due to the GPU's mid-range performance, despite the CPU being in the top 10% of all CPUs.