Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 54 | 72 | 85 | 119 |
| 1440p QHD | 85 | 111 | 131 | 181 |
| 1080p Full HD | 115 | 150 | 176 | 247 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a formidable combination for Lockdown Protocol, placing in the 71st percentile of all tested combos. Out of 3,714 total combinations, this pairing ranks 1,071st, which places it firmly in the upper echelon of systems capable of running the game. This ranking reflects a balance of high-end CPU throughput and strong modern GPU rasterization, resulting in a system that rarely struggles with the FPS title at standard gaming resolutions. The data indicates that the combo is not just adequate but significantly overqualified for most settings, with performance headroom that becomes evident at lower resolutions where frame rates skyrocket.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 1,071 out of 3,714 tested configurations puts it in the top 29% of all systems evaluated for Lockdown Protocol. This is a strong result, suggesting that the pairing of the Zen 3-based 12-core processor with the RDNA 4.0 graphics card is well-balanced for this specific title. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 41,376 places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 23,877 puts it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. The high CPU percentile relative to the GPU suggests that the processor provides a solid foundation, ensuring that the graphics card is rarely bottlenecked by compute limitations.
When interpreting the rank, it is important to note that the GPU’s percentile is lower than the CPU’s, which means the graphics card is the more likely limiting factor in this pairing. However, even with that consideration, the overall combo rank remains high due to the sheer performance of both components. The system clears the 60 FPS playable threshold at all tested resolutions except for one specific ultra-high preset configuration, which will be detailed later. The rank indicates that this build is positioned to handle the game with high fidelity at 1440p and 1080p, and even at 4K, it maintains playability at most settings. This is not a marginal setup; it is one that delivers a consistently smooth experience.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is bracketed by several modern Intel and AMD mobile processors. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H scores 41,263, which is a mere 0.3% lower than the Ryzen 9’s average. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 both score 41,215 and 41,208 respectively, each trailing by 0.4%. On the other side, the Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 41,576, which is 0.5% higher. These deltas are negligible in real-world gaming terms, meaning that swapping the Ryzen 9 5900X for any of these processors would yield virtually identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, as the game is unlikely to stress the CPU to a point where these small differences manifest.
For the GPU, the Radeon RX 9070’s nearest rivals present a more interesting comparison. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 23,736, trailing by 0.6%, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800S scores 24,063, leading by 0.8%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile scores 23,628, which is 1.1% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24,170, leading by 1.2%. These are all within a tight band of performance, suggesting that the RX 9070 performs similarly to these older high-end cards and a modern mid-range mobile part. In practice, any of these GPUs would produce similar frame rates, meaning that users with these alternatives should expect comparable gameplay experiences in Lockdown Protocol.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data shows a clear shift in system bottleneck behavior depending on resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is heavily GPU-bound at lower presets, with the CPU providing ample headroom. The jump from Low to Ultra settings at 1080p shows a reduction in average FPS from 247.3 to 115, a drop of 132.3 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is the primary driver of performance changes, as the CPU is likely not saturated at these frame rates. The CPU’s high multi-threaded score of 16,262 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can easily feed the GPU at these levels.
At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly. The average FPS at Low is 180.9, which drops to 85.1 at Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 95.8 FPS difference, which is still substantial but proportionally less steep than at 1080p. This suggests that the GPU is still the main constraint, but the CPU’s role becomes slightly more prominent as resolution increases. The 4K results confirm this trend. At 3840x2160, the Low preset yields 118.8 FPS, but Ultra drops to 53.6, a 65.2 FPS difference. The fact that the system cannot maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra suggests that the GPU is hitting its compute limits, while the CPU is likely not the limiting factor at this resolution, given its strong performance at lower resolutions.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Lockdown Protocol, and it runs it exceptionally well. The verdict by resolution confirms that the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at all tested settings for both 1920x1080 and 2560x1440. At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is Ultra, achieving an average of 115 FPS. At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is also Ultra, with an average of 85.1 FPS. For 3840x2160, the system achieves playable frame rates at High, Low, and Medium presets, with High being the best playable setting at 71.5 FPS average. The only configuration that fails to meet the 60 FPS threshold is 4K Ultra, which averages 53.6 FPS.
For users with 1080p or 1440p monitors, this system offers a flawless experience, allowing maximum settings without any concerns about frame rate drops below the playable threshold. For 4K users, the system is capable of high-fidelity gaming, but they will need to compromise on the Ultra preset, settling for High settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The data suggests that this is a high-performance combination that will not disappoint for this title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates provide a detailed picture of performance across all resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance. The Low preset yields an average of 247.3 FPS, Medium drops to 176.3 FPS, High produces 150.4 FPS, and Ultra maintains 115 FPS. All of these values are far above the 60 FPS threshold, offering a highly responsive experience.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high. Low settings average 180.9 FPS, Medium averages 131.1 FPS, High averages 110.8 FPS, and Ultra averages 85.1 FPS. The scaling is consistent, with each preset tier reducing performance by a predictable margin. At 3840x2160, the performance is more demanding. Low settings average 118.8 FPS, Medium averages 84.7 FPS, High averages 71.5 FPS, and Ultra averages 53.6 FPS. The drop from High to Ultra is significant, representing a 17.9 FPS decrease, which pushes the system below the playable threshold. The data shows that this combination is best suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p, while still being capable of a quality 4K experience at slightly reduced settings.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with maximum settings?
A: No, at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the system averages 53.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is High, which averages 71.5 FPS.
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this PC?
A: The best experience is at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, delivering an average of 115 FPS. Alternatively, 2560x1440 with Ultra settings also provides a smooth experience at 85.1 FPS average.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?
A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X has an average benchmark score of 41,376. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14650HX, scores 41,576, which is 0.5% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H scores 41,263, just 0.3% lower. These differences are negligible for gaming.
Q: Is the GPU or CPU more important for this game at 1440p?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary factor. At 2560x1440, performance drops from 180.9 FPS at Low to 85.1 FPS at Ultra, a 95.8 FPS swing driven by graphical settings, suggesting the GPU is the main constraint.
Q: What is the performance difference between the RX 9070 and the RTX 2080 SUPER?
A: The RX 9070 has an average score of 23,877, while the RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24,170, which is 1.2% higher. In practical terms, they perform nearly identically in this game.
Q: Does the system meet the 60 FPS threshold at all resolutions?
A: No. It meets the threshold at all settings for 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, and at High, Medium, and Low for 3840x2160. The only configuration that falls short is 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which averages 53.6 FPS.