Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 37 | 48 | 56 | 78 |
| 1440p QHD | 59 | 78 | 85 | 125 |
| 1080p Full HD | 76 | 103 | 121 | 166 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT combination delivers a versatile 1080p and 1440p gaming experience in Lockdown Protocol, though 4K performance requires compromise. Benchmark data indicates this pairing hits a comfortable 75.5 FPS at 1080p Ultra, while 1440p High achieves 77.6 FPS, positioning it as a strong mid-range setup that only struggles at 4K with maximum settings.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest playable setting at 4K resolution?
A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS playable threshold, averaging 78.1 FPS. Medium drops to 56.2 FPS, High falls to 48.2 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 37.4 FPS.
Q: Can this combination run Lockdown Protocol at 1440p with high settings?
A: Yes, 2560x1440 High delivers 77.6 FPS on average, well above the playable threshold. Medium runs at 85.2 FPS, Low at 124.9 FPS, but Ultra dips below 60 FPS at 58.8 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 9 5900X scores 41,376 in average benchmark score, placing it 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (41,263) and 0.4% ahead of both the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (41,215) and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (41,208). It trails the Intel Core i7-14650HX (41,576) by 0.5%.
Q: What GPU performance percentile does the RX 6650 XT achieve?
A: The GPU ranks in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19,765. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla K40m, scores 19,885 (0.6% higher), while the AMD FirePro D300 scores 19,637 (0.7% lower).
Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5900X a strong processor for gaming workloads?
A: The CPU sits in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong overall performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,262 and single-core score of 1,527 show balanced capabilities for both threaded and single-threaded game logic.
Q: What memory bandwidth does the RX 6650 XT provide?
A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 280.3 GB/s bandwidth. Clock speeds reach up to 2635 MHz boost with a game clock of 2410 MHz.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low (166.2 FPS) and Ultra (75.5 FPS) settings spans 90.7 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU is the primary constraint as visual fidelity increases. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,527 in Cinebench R23 ensures frame delivery remains consistent even at lower resolutions where the GPU has headroom.
Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern continues but with compressed margins. Low settings produce 124.9 FPS, while Ultra yields 58.8 FPS—a 66.1 FPS spread. The medium preset at 85.2 FPS shows the GPU becoming more influential, as the increased pixel count strains the RX 6650 XT's 280.3 GB/s memory bandwidth. The CPU still provides adequate throughput, evidenced by the 5000 series' 64 MB L3 cache handling game data efficiently.
At 3840x2160, the GPU dominates entirely. Low settings average 78.1 FPS, but Medium drops to 56.2 FPS and Ultra falls to 37.4 FPS. This steep degradation highlights the RX 6650 XT's 8 GB VRAM capacity and 128-bit bus as limiting factors at 4K, regardless of CPU capability. The Ryzen 9 5900X's 12 cores and 24 threads remain underutilized in this scenario, with the GPU's 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs becoming the decisive hardware.
The data indicates that at 1080p and 1440p, both components contribute meaningfully, but the GPU increasingly dictates performance as resolution rises. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking ensures it won't bottleneck at lower settings, while the GPU's 65th percentile ranking aligns with observed mid-range frame rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination delivers its strongest results. Low settings average 166.2 FPS, Medium reaches 121.2 FPS, High hits 103.3 FPS, and Ultra maintains 75.5 FPS. All presets comfortably exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold, with even the most demanding settings providing a 25.8% margin above the minimum target.
The 2560x1440 resolution shows more variance. Low averages 124.9 FPS, Medium runs at 85.2 FPS, and High produces 77.6 FPS—all playable. Ultra, however, falls to 58.8 FPS, missing the playable threshold by 1.2 FPS. This creates an interesting scenario where High is the best playable setting, offering 77.6 FPS while Ultra sacrifices performance for marginal visual gains.
At 3840x2160, only Low achieves playable status with 78.1 FPS. Medium drops to 56.2 FPS, 3.8 FPS below the threshold. High manages 48.2 FPS, and Ultra is unplayable at 37.4 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 52.1% performance loss, reflecting the GPU's difficulty processing 4K workloads.
Across all resolutions, the data shows consistent frame rate behavior with no anomalous spikes. The RX 6650 XT's 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 337.3 GTexel/s texture rate provide predictable scaling, while the Ryzen 9 5900X's 3.70 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost clocks maintain stable frame delivery.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The Ryzen 9 5900X's nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (41,263, 0.3% slower), Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (41,215, 0.4% slower), AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (41,208, 0.4% slower), and Intel Core i7-14650HX (41,576, 0.5% faster). These processors would demonstrate nearly identical CPU-bound behavior in Lockdown Protocol, particularly at 1080p where the CPU provides headroom.
For the GPU, the RX 6650 XT's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla K40m (19,885, 0.6% faster), AMD FirePro D300 (19,637, 0.7% slower), AMD FirePro W7000 (19,905, 0.7% faster), and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 (19,602, 0.8% slower). These GPUs would produce similar frame rates in the game, with the K40m potentially offering marginally higher performance and the Quadro K5200 slightly lower results.
A system pairing the Ryzen 9 5900X with any of these rival GPUs would show negligible differences in Lockdown Protocol, as the 0.6-0.8% performance deltas translate to less than 1 FPS difference at most settings. Similarly, swapping the CPU for a rival processor while keeping the RX 6650 XT would maintain nearly identical frame rates, given the sub-1% CPU score variations.
The combination's overall rank of 2,356 out of 3,714 tested combos places it in the 36.6th percentile, suggesting it outperforms the majority of tested systems while remaining far from top-tier configurations.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT ranks 2,356th out of 3,714 tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol. This position reflects a mid-pack placement, with the CPU's 87th percentile performance partially offsetting the GPU's 65th percentile ranking.
In practical terms, this rank means the combination outperforms roughly 63.4% of tested systems in this game. The ranking aligns with the observed frame rates: strong 1080p and 1440p performance, but 4K limitations that prevent higher placement. Systems ranked above this combo likely feature more powerful GPUs with higher VRAM capacities and wider memory buses, addressing the 4K bottleneck evident in the RX 6650 XT's 128-bit interface.
The rank also suggests that the CPU isn't the limiting factor in most scenarios. The Ryzen 9 5900X's 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample processing power, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint at higher resolutions. This is consistent with the 4K Ultra performance dropping to 37.4 FPS, a figure that would remain similar even with a faster processor.
Compared to the nearest rival components, this combination's rank could shift by only a few positions if paired with the Intel Core i7-14650HX (0.5% faster CPU) or NVIDIA Tesla K40m (0.6% faster GPU). These differences are marginal in real-world gameplay, confirming that the combo's placement is stable within its performance class.
The Verdict
This system can run Lockdown Protocol successfully at 1080p and 1440p with appropriate settings. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low (166.2 FPS), Medium (121.2 FPS), High (103.3 FPS), and Ultra (75.5 FPS)—exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold, making this resolution fully playable at maximum quality.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on Low (124.9 FPS), Medium (85.2 FPS), and High (77.6 FPS), but Ultra falls short at 58.8 FPS. Users targeting 1440p should select High settings for the best balance of visual quality and performance, as the 77.6 FPS average provides a 29.3% margin above the playable threshold.
At 3840x2160, only Low settings (78.1 FPS) achieve playable status. Medium (56.2 FPS) and High (48.2 FPS) miss the threshold, while Ultra (37.4 FPS) is unplayable. For 4K gaming, this combination requires significant settings compromises, limiting the experience to Low quality.
The verdict is clear: this PC delivers a smooth 1080p Ultra experience and a solid 1440p High experience, but cannot sustain 60 FPS at 4K beyond Low settings. The RX 6650 XT's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus represent the primary limitation at higher resolutions, while the Ryzen 9 5900X's strong multi-threaded performance ensures the CPU never becomes the bottleneck. For gamers prioritizing frame rates over resolution, the 1080p and 1440p results are excellent; for 4K enthusiasts, this combination falls short of the playable threshold at all but minimal settings.