Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 40 | 46 | 64 |
| 1440p QHD | 46 | 62 | 71 | 100 |
| 1080p Full HD | 63 | 84 | 96 | 136 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
Lockdown Protocol is a fast-paced FPS where frame rate directly translates to aiming responsiveness and target tracking. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a highly capable experience, but the playable headroom varies significantly across display resolutions. The data indicates a system that is excellent for 1080p and 1440p gaming, while 4K requires specific settings compromises to maintain a smooth 60 FPS target. This analysis breaks down the measured performance metrics for this specific hardware pairing.
Best Settings per Resolution
The most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold is the goal for each resolution.
At 3840x2160, the data shows the system cannot handle the higher graphical presets while staying above 60 FPS. The Low preset is the only playable option, achieving an average of 64 FPS. The Medium preset drops to an average of 46 FPS, and High falls further to 40 FPS, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay. Ultra is the most demanding, with an average of just 30 FPS.
For 2560x1440, the system finds a solid footing. The High preset is the best playable option, delivering an average of 62 FPS. This is a significant step up from 4K, allowing for much better visual fidelity. The Medium preset runs at 71 FPS and Low at 100 FPS, both of which are also above the threshold, but High offers the best visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS mark. Ultra, however, remains unplayable at 46 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the combination has ample performance headroom. The Ultra preset, the most demanding available, is fully playable with an average of 63 FPS. This means users can experience the game with all settings maxed out at the most common resolution. For even higher frame rates, the High preset averages 84 FPS, Medium 96 FPS, and Low reaches 136 FPS, but the Ultra preset is the clear choice for maximum visual quality without sacrificing playability.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions and presets reveals a clear picture of component roles. The data shows that the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D, with its strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, is not the limiting factor in this pairing. The primary bottleneck shifts firmly to the Intel Arc B570 as resolution and graphical load increase.
This is evident when comparing the 1080p and 1440p results. At 1080p Ultra, the system achieves 63 FPS. Moving to 1440p Ultra, the frame rate drops to 46 FPS, a reduction that is almost entirely attributable to the increased pixel fill rate demand on the GPU. The same pattern is visible at High settings, where frame rates drop from 84 FPS at 1080p to 62 FPS at 1440p. The CPU, which has ample headroom based on its benchmark scores, is able to feed the GPU sufficiently at these settings, so the GPU's raw rendering throughput dictates the frame rate.
The 4K results further solidify this analysis. At 3840x2160, the GPU is heavily strained. The High preset manages only 40 FPS, and Medium drops to 46 FPS, showing that even reducing the load on the GPU yields only marginal improvements. The jump from 1440p High (62 FPS) to 4K High (40 FPS) is a severe drop, indicating the GPU is overwhelmed by the 4K resolution's demands. The CPU's role is to ensure the frame times are consistent and that it does not introduce a bottleneck; given its 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, it performs this role admirably.
In summary, the CPU provides a robust foundation for high frame rates, but the Intel Arc B570's performance ceiling is the deciding factor for resolution and preset selection. The system is GPU-bound in nearly all scenarios, especially at 1440p and 4K.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with high settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with the High preset, the system achieves an average of 40 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only the Low preset at this resolution is playable, with an average of 64 FPS.
Q: What is the best visual quality I can expect at 1440p while maintaining 60 FPS?
A: The data indicates the High preset is the best option. It delivers an average of 62 FPS, just clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 46 FPS and is not recommended for smooth play.
Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D or the Intel Arc B570 more important for this game?
A: The benchmark results show the system is heavily GPU-bound across all tested resolutions. The performance drops as resolution increases, from 136 FPS at 1080p Low to 30 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation. The CPU's high benchmark percentile suggests it is not the bottleneck.
Q: How does the system perform at 1080p with maximum settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset, the system averages 63 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS playable threshold, meaning the game is fully playable at the highest visual settings for this resolution.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combination?
A: The measured data includes a minimum frame rate for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1080p, the min FPS is 82. At 1440p, it is 60. At 4K, it is 39. No min FPS data is available for the Low, High, or Ultra presets.
Q: Is the 1440p Medium preset a better choice than High for a more consistent experience?
A: The data shows the Medium preset at 2560x1440 averages 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS, offering a larger safety margin. The High preset averages 62 FPS, but its minimum FPS is not recorded. For users prioritizing frame time consistency, Medium presents a more stable option based on the available data.
The Verdict
Based on the measured frame rates, this PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but the definition of "run" depends entirely on the target resolution and settings. The verdict by resolution is clear.
At 1920x1080, the system is a definitive yes. Every preset, from Low to Ultra, clears the 60 FPS threshold. The best experience is at Ultra settings, which provides an average of 63 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the system remains very capable. The High, Medium, and Low presets are all playable. The High preset is the recommended choice, hitting an average of 62 FPS and offering a solid balance of visual quality and performance.
At 3840x2160, the system is limited. Only the Low preset manages to stay above the 60 FPS mark, with an average of 64 FPS. All other settings, including Medium and High, fall below the playable threshold. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, at 30 FPS.
Therefore, the verdict is that this CPU and GPU combination is a strong performer for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it is not suited for high-fidelity 4K gaming in Lockdown Protocol.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table details the exact average, minimum, and maximum frame rates recorded for each resolution and settings combination.
3840x2160
- Ultra: Avg 30 FPS
- High: Avg 40 FPS
- Medium: Avg 46 FPS, Min 39 FPS, Max 52 FPS
- Low: Avg 64 FPS
2560x1440
- Ultra: Avg 46 FPS
- High: Avg 62 FPS
- Medium: Avg 71 FPS, Min 60 FPS, Max 81 FPS
- Low: Avg 100 FPS
1920x1080
- Ultra: Avg 63 FPS
- High: Avg 84 FPS
- Medium: Avg 96 FPS, Min 82 FPS, Max 111 FPS
- Low: Avg 136 FPS
How This Combo Ranks
In the grand scheme of tested hardware configurations for Lockdown Protocol, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and Intel Arc B570 holds a rank of 2987 out of 3714 tested combos. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which is a direct consequence of the GPU's performance tier. While the CPU is a top-tier part, ranking in the 92nd percentile, the GPU's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs anchors the overall combo rank. This indicates that while the system is perfectly capable for mainstream 1080p and 1440p play, it does not compete with the high-end combinations that pair top-tier CPUs with flagship GPUs.
The data suggests that this rank is not a measure of failure, but a reflection of the balanced performance of a mid-range GPU. It outperforms many older or less capable systems, but it is outclassed by those with more powerful graphics cards. The combination's strength lies in its overall efficiency and capability at standard resolutions, not in raw performance extremes.
Similar Performance Alternatives
If the exact combination of an AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and Intel Arc B570 is not available, several other hardware pairings would deliver a very similar level of performance in Lockdown Protocol.
The nearest rivals to the Intel Arc B570 are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which is 0.1% faster, and the Intel Arc A750, which is 0.1% slower. These are the closest direct equivalents for the GPU. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (0.4% faster) and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (0.5% slower) are also listed as near matches, though they represent more divergent product families.
On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D has close rivals in the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (0.1% faster), Intel Core i9-14900 (0.5% faster), Intel Xeon w5-2545 (0.2% slower), and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (0.7% slower). For a gaming-focused build, the Intel Core i9-14900 is the most relevant alternative, as it is a high-end desktop consumer chip. The Xeon and Ryzen AI parts are from server or mobile segments.
For a system that behaves similarly to this combo, one would look for a configuration with a strong mid-range GPU like the Intel Arc A750 or a mobile RTX 3070, paired with a high-performance desktop CPU. The overall frame rates in Lockdown Protocol would be nearly identical, as the GPU is the primary driver of the measured performance. The choice between these alternatives would likely come down to platform features and availability rather than any significant difference in in-game frame rates.