Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 56 | 76 | 89 | 126 |
| 1440p QHD | 86 | 116 | 134 | 189 |
| 1080p Full HD | 121 | 162 | 185 | 260 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT delivers a strong performance profile for Lockdown Protocol, with benchmark results showing that the combination can handle the game at high frame rates across all tested resolutions. The data indicates that this system comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold in most configurations, with only the most demanding 4K Ultra preset falling short of that mark.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates for this CPU-GPU combo reveal a clear scaling pattern across the three resolutions tested. At 1920x1080, the system produces exceptional results, with the Low preset delivering an average of 259.7 FPS, which drops to 185.2 FPS on Medium, 162.4 FPS on High, and 120.8 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is substantial, representing a 138.9 FPS difference, yet even the most demanding preset maintains a triple-digit average.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains robust but shows the expected resolution penalty. The Low preset averages 189.2 FPS, Medium delivers 133.6 FPS, High reaches 115.7 FPS, and Ultra still holds at 86.4 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is consistent, with each preset losing roughly 27-35% of its frame rate, though the Ultra preset sees the smallest relative drop from 120.8 to 86.4 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the data shows the most significant performance impact. The Low preset averages 126.1 FPS, which remains highly playable, while Medium drops to 88.8 FPS and High settles at 76 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 55.7 FPS, which is the only configuration across all tests that dips below the 60 FPS playable threshold. This 4K Ultra result indicates that the combination of pixel count and maximum settings exceeds what this hardware can sustain in Lockdown Protocol.
It is notably the measured FPS data does not include minimum or maximum frame time values, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates. This means the data shows steady-state performance but does not capture potential frame pacing issues or momentary stutters that could affect the gameplay experience.
Best Settings per Resolution
The benchmark data identifies the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS at each resolution, and the results are encouraging for this hardware combination.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best setting, delivering an average of 120.8 FPS. This leaves significant headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting that the system is not heavily stressed at this resolution and could potentially handle additional graphical load if such options existed.
For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again emerges as the best playable configuration, averaging 86.4 FPS. The 26.4 FPS margin above the playable threshold provides comfortable performance, though the drop from 120.8 FPS at 1080p Ultra indicates that the resolution increase does require meaningful GPU resources.
At 3840x2160, the High preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 76 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short at 55.7 FPS, meaning that users targeting 4K must choose between High settings and the Ultra preset. The 20.3 FPS gap between High and Ultra at 4K suggests that the Ultra preset adds a significant rendering burden that this combo cannot fully handle at this resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank for this CPU-GPU pair in Lockdown Protocol places it at position 928 out of 3714 tested combinations. This percentile positioning indicates that the system performs better than roughly 75% of all tested configurations, placing it in the upper quartile of hardware combinations for this game.
This ranking is particularly notable given the individual component percentiles. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 9070 XT ranks at the 55th percentile among all GPUs. The system's combined performance in Lockdown Protocol exceeds what the GPU's individual percentile might suggest, indicating that the CPU's strengths complement the GPU well in this particular title.
The rank of 928 suggests that while this combo is far from the top of the leaderboard, it sits in a strong position relative to the broader hardware landscape. The fact that it achieves 120.8 FPS at 1080p Ultra and 86.4 FPS at 1440p Ultra demonstrates that the combination is well-matched for high-refresh-rate gaming at mainstream resolutions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provides context for what other hardware might deliver similar performance in Lockdown Protocol.
For the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, the closest alternatives based on average benchmark scores are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS with a score of 39603 (0.4% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 at 40048 (0.7% lower), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 at 39485 (0.7% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 at 40081 (0.8% lower). These processors all sit within a tight performance band around the 9800X3D's average score of 39768, suggesting that any of these CPUs would yield nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol when paired with the same GPU.
On the GPU side, the RX 9070 XT's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7770M with an average score of 13536 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 at 13515 (0.2% higher), the NVIDIA P106-090 at 13470 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon Pro 555 at 13407 (1% higher). These delta values are remarkably small, meaning that systems built with any of these GPUs paired with a comparable CPU would likely produce frame rates within a few percent of the RX 9070 XT results in this game.
The extremely tight grouping of these rival scores suggests that the specific choice among these alternatives would have minimal impact on Lockdown Protocol performance. Users with any of these CPU-GPU combinations should expect broadly similar gameplay experiences.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with maximum settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the measured average FPS is 55.7, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset at 4K delivers 76 FPS and is the most demanding playable option at this resolution.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 delivers an average of 86.4 FPS, making it both the best visual option and a playable configuration. This provides a 26.4 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the 1080p performance compare to 1440p?
A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system averages 120.8 FPS, while at 2560x1440 with Ultra settings it averages 86.4 FPS. This represents a 34.4 FPS difference, or approximately 28.5% lower performance at the higher resolution.
Q: Is the RX 9070 XT a bottleneck for this CPU in this game?
A: The GPU ranks at the 55th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks at the 87th percentile. The measured FPS scaling between resolutions suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at higher settings, but the combo still achieves playable frame rates in all but 4K Ultra.
Q: What is the lowest performing preset that remains playable at 4K?
A: The Low preset at 3840x2160 averages 126.1 FPS, the Medium preset averages 88.8 FPS, and the High preset averages 76 FPS. All three are playable, with High being the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to all tested systems?
A: The combination ranks 928th out of 3714 total tested combos for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the upper quartile of all tested hardware configurations for this game.
The Verdict
The benchmark data clearly demonstrates that this system can run Lockdown Protocol with playable performance across most configurations. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves 120.8 FPS, providing a strong experience for high-refresh-rate monitors. The 2560x1440 resolution also supports Ultra settings at 86.4 FPS, which is comfortable for standard 60Hz displays and even some higher refresh rate monitors.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. The High preset delivers 76 FPS and the Medium preset achieves 88.8 FPS, both of which clear the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset reaches 126.1 FPS, making it the best-performing option for competitive play at 4K. However, the Ultra preset at 55.7 FPS falls below the playable threshold, meaning 4K users must compromise on visual quality to maintain smooth frame rates.
The verdict by resolution is straightforward: this combo is fully playable at 1080p and 1440p with all settings, and playable at 4K with High settings or lower. The only configuration that fails to meet the 60 FPS standard is 4K Ultra, which represents a minor limitation given the overall strong performance.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals interesting insights into how the CPU and GPU contribute to performance at different resolutions in Lockdown Protocol. The CPU's strong benchmark results, including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23230 and a single-core score of 2080, provide a solid foundation for gaming performance. The GPU's specifications, including 4096 shading units and a 256-bit memory bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth, indicate substantial rendering capability.
At 1920x1080, the system achieves 259.7 FPS on Low settings and 120.8 FPS on Ultra, showing that resolution scaling has a significant effect. The 138.9 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p demonstrates that the GPU is heavily utilized even at this resolution, while the CPU's high single-thread performance helps maintain these elevated frame rates.
The transition from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent performance drop across all presets, with the Low preset falling from 259.7 to 189.2 FPS and Ultra falling from 120.8 to 86.4 FPS. This scaling pattern suggests that the GPU becomes increasingly important as resolution increases, since the rendering workload grows with pixel count while the CPU workload remains relatively constant.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's role becomes even more pronounced. The Low preset drops to 126.1 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 55.7 FPS, indicating that the GPU's rendering capacity is the primary constraint at 4K. The CPU's performance remains sufficient to feed the GPU at this resolution, as evidenced by the fact that even the lowest settings still achieve triple-digit frame rates.
The data implies that for this game, the CPU matters most at lower resolutions where high frame rates demand quick per-frame processing, while the GPU dominates at higher resolutions where raw rendering throughput is the limiting factor. At 1080p, the combination of the 9800X3D's strong single-thread performance and the RX 9070 XT's capabilities produces exceptional results. At 4K Ultra, the GPU's limitations become apparent, with the 55.7 FPS result showing that the RX 9070 XT cannot sustain maximum settings at this resolution despite the CPU's ample headroom.