Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 69 | 92 | 105 | 148 |
| 1440p QHD | 107 | 142 | 163 | 230 |
| 1080p Full HD | 146 | 194 | 223 | 313 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti delivers a commanding performance profile in Lockdown Protocol, a fast-paced FPS that clearly rewards high frame rates. The measured data shows this combination not only clears the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested resolution and preset, but it does so with substantial headroom, often doubling or more than doubling that baseline. This places the combo at rank 341 out of 3714 tested configurations, putting it in the top 9.2% of all systems benchmarked for this title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces exceptional frame rates that leverage the high refresh rate potential of the resolution. The Low preset averages 313 FPS, which is a staggering figure that leaves enormous headroom for competitive play. Moving up through the settings, Medium delivers an average of 223 FPS with a minimum of 189 and a maximum of 256, showing tight frame pacing even under load. High preset averages 194 FPS, while the demanding Ultra preset still maintains an impressive 146 FPS average. These numbers suggest that at 1080p, the bottleneck shifts almost entirely to the CPU and game engine, as the GPU has ample resources to render frames well beyond typical display refresh rates.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally strong but shows the expected scaling as pixel count increases. Low preset averages 230 FPS, still a very high number that indicates the RTX 5070 Ti has significant compute headroom. Medium settings produce an average of 163 FPS with a minimum of 139 and maximum of 188, representing a 26.9% drop from Low. High preset delivers 142 FPS average, while Ultra maintains a solid 107 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p shows approximately a 26-30% performance reduction across comparable presets, which is consistent with the 1.78x pixel count increase and suggests the GPU is becoming more relevant but not yet saturated.
At 3840x2160, the true 4K workload finally begins to stress the system meaningfully. Low preset still achieves a very playable 148 FPS average, demonstrating that even at 4K this combination has plenty of performance for competitive settings. Medium settings produce 105 FPS average with a minimum of 90 and maximum of 121, which remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold with good consistency. High preset averages 92 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 69 FPS average—still playable but now approaching the threshold where frame drops could become noticeable in intense firefights. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows roughly a 35-40% reduction in frame rates, which aligns with the 2.25x pixel increase, indicating the GPU is now the dominant performance factor.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 341 out of 3714 tested configurations places this system in the 91st percentile of all tested hardware combinations for Lockdown Protocol. This is a strong showing that reflects the balanced nature of the Ryzen 7 9700X and RTX 5070 Ti pairing. The CPU itself sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs benchmarked, with an average benchmark score of 37943, while the GPU also achieves the 86th percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 49957. These percentile rankings indicate that both components are well above average individually, and their combination produces a synergistic result that ranks higher than either component alone might suggest.
The rank of 341 means there are 340 other tested combos that perform better in this specific game, which is a relatively small number given that the database contains 3714 total combinations. This suggests the system is near the upper echelon of performance for Lockdown Protocol, with only the most extreme hardware configurations exceeding it. The game is clearly well-optimized for high-end systems, and this particular pairing extracts near-maximum performance without requiring flagship-class components. The data implies that users seeking higher rankings would need to move to top-tier CPUs and GPUs, but the practical difference in gameplay would be minimal given how far above the 60 FPS threshold this system operates.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K Ultra settings?
A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 69 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. However, the margin is relatively slim compared to lower settings, so users sensitive to frame drops may prefer High settings at 92 FPS or Medium at 105 FPS for more headroom.
Q: What is the best resolution for competitive play with this hardware?
A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 313 FPS average, which provides maximum responsiveness for competitive scenarios. Even at 2560x1440 with Low settings, the 230 FPS average remains well above what most high-refresh monitors can display, making 1440p a viable competitive option.
Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 49957, which is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50001 (0.1% slower) and slightly ahead of the Intel Arc A550M at 49737 (0.4% faster). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT by 2% but leads the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 3.1%.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 9700X a bottleneck for the RTX 5070 Ti in this game?
A: The data suggests minimal bottlenecking. At 1080p, where CPU load is highest, the system still achieves 313 FPS on Low settings, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU effectively. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20485 and single-core score of 2211 are strong, and its 3DMark 16-thread score of 9824 shows robust multi-threaded performance for game logic.
Q: What kind of frame consistency can be expected at 1440p Medium settings?
A: The measured data shows an average of 163 FPS with a minimum of 139 FPS and maximum of 188 FPS. This 49 FPS range between minimum and maximum indicates good frame pacing with no severe drops, making this an excellent balance of visual quality and performance.
Q: Does the system maintain playable performance at 4K Medium settings?
A: Yes, the 3840x2160 Medium preset delivers 105 FPS average with a minimum of 90 FPS and maximum of 121 FPS. The minimum frame rate remains 50% above the 60 FPS playable threshold, providing consistent performance for 4K gaming.
The Verdict
This system can absolutely run Lockdown Protocol, and it does so with exceptional capability across all resolutions and presets. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: every single tested configuration at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 1080p, the best settings are Ultra with 146 FPS average, at 1440p Ultra delivers 107 FPS average, and even at 4K Ultra the system maintains 69 FPS average. The only scenario where the system approaches the playable limit is 4K Ultra, where the 69 FPS average leaves just 9 FPS of headroom above the threshold—this is playable but may show occasional dips in heavy combat scenarios. For users who prioritize maximum visual fidelity at 4K, the Ultra preset is viable, but the High preset at 92 FPS or Medium at 105 FPS provides more comfortable margins. At 1440p and below, the system has so much performance headroom that users can enable maximum settings without any concern about maintaining smooth frame rates.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals the shifting balance between CPU and GPU influence in Lockdown Protocol. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a more significant role, as evidenced by the relatively modest FPS drops when moving from Low to Ultra settings—from 313 to 146 FPS, a 53.3% reduction. This indicates that at lower resolutions, the CPU and game engine are more frequently the limiting factor, as the GPU has enough bandwidth to render frames quickly but must wait for game logic updates. The Ryzen 7 9700X's strong single-thread performance, demonstrated by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2211 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1280, helps maintain high minimum frame rates in this scenario.
As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to assert more influence. The performance drop from Low to Ultra is 53.5% (230 to 107 FPS), similar to 1080p, but the absolute frame rates are lower, indicating the GPU is handling more work per frame. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 53.4% reduction (148 to 69 FPS), but the overall performance is constrained by the GPU's ability to fill the massive pixel count. The RTX 5070 Ti's 8960 shading units and 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance are heavily utilized at 4K, and its 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth becomes critical for texture streaming and high-resolution assets.
The data implies that at 1080p, users might see some benefit from a stronger CPU, as the system is partially CPU-bound. However, the Ryzen 7 9700X's performance is sufficient to avoid major bottlenecks, as evidenced by the 313 FPS Low preset result. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, and users would see greater gains from a more powerful GPU than a CPU upgrade. The sweet spot for this combination appears to be 1440p, where both components contribute meaningfully to overall performance without either becoming a significant bottleneck.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves 146 FPS average. This provides an excellent balance of visual quality and performance, with the frame rate being more than double the playable threshold. Users with high refresh rate monitors (144Hz or higher) will find this setting ideal, as the 146 FPS average approaches the refresh limit of most gaming displays. For competitive play where maximum frame rates matter, the Low preset at 313 FPS is the optimal choice, but for general gaming, Ultra is the recommended setting.
At 2560x1440, Ultra settings again deliver the best visual quality while maintaining playable performance at 107 FPS average. This is a strong result that allows users to enjoy maximum graphical fidelity at the popular 1440p resolution without sacrificing smoothness. The 107 FPS average is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides comfortable headroom for demanding scenes. Medium settings at 163 FPS would be the choice for users with 165Hz or 240Hz monitors, but for most users, Ultra provides the best visual experience.
For 3840x2160, the most demanding playable preset is Ultra at 69 FPS average. This just barely clears the 60 FPS threshold, so users who are sensitive to frame rate fluctuations may prefer High settings at 92 FPS for a more stable experience. Medium settings at 105 FPS offer even more headroom and may be the sweet spot for 4K gaming on this hardware, providing a significant visual improvement over Low while maintaining high frame rates. The 4K Ultra setting is technically playable but represents the edge of this system's capabilities, and users should consider their tolerance for potential frame dips in intense gameplay moments.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X has an average benchmark score of 37943, placing it extremely close to several alternatives. The Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37911, a mere 0.1% difference, making it essentially interchangeable in performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 also scores 37904, also within 0.1% of the 9700X. The Intel Core 5 211E at 37829 is 0.3% slower, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37804 is 0.4% slower. These minimal deltas mean that systems built with any of these CPUs would exhibit nearly identical performance in Lockdown Protocol, assuming the GPU remains the same.
For the GPU, the RTX 5070 Ti's nearest rivals show more variation. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951, which is 2% higher, making it a slightly faster alternative. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50001 is 0.1% slower, essentially matching the RTX 5070 Ti's 49957 score. The Intel Arc A550M at 49737 is 0.4% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT at 48477 is 3.1% slower. These benchmarks suggest that users with a RX 6900 XT might see marginally higher frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios, while those with an RX 6800 XT would experience slightly lower performance. However, given that all these GPUs are within a 3.1% performance band, the gameplay experience in Lockdown Protocol would be remarkably similar across all of them. The choice between these alternatives would likely come down to other factors like driver preferences, feature support, or platform compatibility rather than raw performance in this specific game.