Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
239 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
115 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
177 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
82 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
114 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
54 FPS
6.7ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 37,943
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 48,477

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 54 69 80 114
1440p QHD 82 113 128 177
1080p Full HD 115 150 170 239

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 150
1920x1080 Low 239
1920x1080 Medium 170
1920x1080 Ultra 115
2560x1440 High 113
2560x1440 Low 177
2560x1440 Medium 128
2560x1440 Ultra 82
3840x2160 High 69
3840x2160 Low 114
3840x2160 Medium 80
3840x2160 Ultra 54

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT delivers a strong performance profile in Lockdown Protocol, with measured frame rates that scale predictably across resolutions and presets. The data indicates this combination is capable of high-refresh-rate gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires a more selective approach to settings to maintain smooth motion. The following analysis breaks down the measured results, contextualizes them against comparable hardware, and provides clear guidance on the best settings for each resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination covers three resolutions and four quality presets, providing a comprehensive view of performance scaling. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high across the board. The Low preset averages 238.5 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium drops the average to 170.1 FPS, while High reduces it further to 150 FPS. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still maintains a very playable average of 115.4 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a reduction of approximately 123 FPS, indicating that the GPU has ample headroom even at the highest settings.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows a clear step down from 1080p. The Low preset averages 176.7 FPS, which is still excellent for competitive play. Medium follows at 128.1 FPS, and High drops to 112.6 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 82.4 FPS, which comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p is roughly 94 FPS, showing that the resolution increase places a significant load on the graphics card, yet the RX 6800 XT handles it well.

At 3840x2160, the performance landscape changes notably. The Low preset averages 114.4 FPS, which remains smooth and playable. Medium drops to 79.8 FPS, and High settles at 68.7 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 54.1 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold and would likely result in noticeable stutter during intense scenes. The spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is about 60 FPS, illustrating that this resolution demands careful tuning. Notably, the dataset does not include min or max FPS values, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates, which still provide a reliable indicator of overall performance.

Across all resolutions, the scaling from Low to Ultra is consistent, with each preset tier reducing the average frame rate by a meaningful margin. The 1080p results show the largest absolute numbers, while 4K demonstrates the steepest performance cost for Ultra settings. For users prioritizing high refresh rates, the 1080p and 1440p results are particularly compelling, while 4K users should target High or lower to stay above 60 FPS.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but only up to the High preset. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 is 68.7 for High, 79.8 for Medium, and 114.4 for Low. The Ultra preset falls short at 54.1 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best preset at 2560x1440 to stay above 60 FPS?

A: The Ultra preset is the best choice, as it maintains an average of 82.4 FPS. All four presets at 1440p exceed the 60 FPS threshold, with Low at 176.7, Medium at 128.1, and High at 112.6 FPS.

Q: How does the 1080p Ultra performance compare to the 4K Ultra performance?

A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 115.4, which is more than double the 54.1 FPS seen at 3840x2160 Ultra. This highlights the significant GPU load increase at higher resolutions.

Q: Is there a preset at 1080p that does not meet the 60 FPS requirement?

A: No, all four presets at 1920x1080 exceed 60 FPS. The lowest measured average is 115.4 FPS at Ultra, which is nearly double the threshold.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combination?

A: The highest average is 238.5 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This indicates the CPU and GPU combination has substantial headroom for high-refresh-rate displays.

Q: Does this PC meet the playable threshold at 4K Medium?

A: Yes, the 4K Medium preset averages 79.8 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict data confirms that both High, Low, and Medium are playable at 4K.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling between resolutions and presets provides insight into how the CPU and GPU share the workload in Lockdown Protocol. The game is an FPS title, and the data reveals that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU demonstrates its capability to feed the graphics card at lower settings.

At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high, with the Low preset reaching 238.5 FPS and Ultra at 115.4 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is roughly 123 FPS, which suggests that the GPU is heavily utilized, but the CPU (AMD Ryzen 7 9700X with 8 cores and 16 threads) is not limiting performance. The Ryzen 7 9700X has a high single-thread score of 1280 in 3DMark and 2211 in Cinebench R23, indicating strong per-core performance that can drive high frame rates. At 1080p, the CPU likely has enough headroom to keep up with the GPU’s output.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop across all presets, with Low at 176.7 FPS and Ultra at 82.4 FPS. The reduction from 1080p to 1440p is consistent, roughly a 35-40% decrease in average FPS depending on the preset. This indicates that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor, as higher resolutions increase the pixel count and shading workload. The CPU’s role diminishes slightly, but the Ryzen 7 9700X still provides sufficient processing power to avoid becoming a bottleneck, as evidenced by the 82.4 FPS at Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s dominance becomes clear. The Low preset averages 114.4 FPS, while Ultra drops to 54.1 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is about 60 FPS, and the overall performance is significantly lower than at lower resolutions. This suggests that the RX 6800 XT is the primary constraint, as the 4K resolution demands a massive amount of graphics processing power. The CPU’s role is reduced further, as the frame rates are lower and the GPU is clearly working near its limits. The data indicates that for users targeting 4K, the GPU choice is critical, while the Ryzen 7 9700X is more than adequate for this game at any resolution.

The scaling between presets also highlights the GPU’s role. At each resolution, the jump from Low to Medium to High to Ultra produces a consistent drop in FPS, which is typical of GPU-bound scenarios. The CPU’s performance is less variable across presets, as its workload does not change as dramatically with graphical settings. Overall, the Ryzen 7 9700X is a capable partner for the RX 6800 XT, ensuring that the GPU is the limiting factor at 1440p and 4K, while at 1080p the combination is well-balanced for high refresh rates.

The Verdict

The data clearly answers whether this PC can run Lockdown Protocol: it can, with excellent playability at most resolutions and presets. The verdict by resolution confirms that 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 offer full playability across all settings, while 3840x2160 requires some compromises.

At 1920x1080, the system easily clears the 60 FPS threshold with every preset. The Ultra preset averages 115.4 FPS, which is nearly double the playable threshold, making this an ideal resolution for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Low preset reaches 238.5 FPS, which is exceptional for competitive play. The verdict data lists Ultra as the best setting at 1080p, with an average FPS of 115.4, confirming that users can max out the game without concern.

At 2560x1440, the system remains fully playable at all presets. The Ultra preset averages 82.4 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a smooth experience. The verdict lists Ultra as the best setting at 1440p, with an average FPS of 82.4. This resolution offers a good balance between visual fidelity and performance, making it a strong choice for users with 1440p displays.

At 3840x2160, the system can run the game at High, Medium, or Low presets, all of which stay above 60 FPS. The High preset averages 68.7 FPS, which is the best playable setting at 4K. The Ultra preset falls to 54.1 FPS, which is below the threshold and not recommended. The verdict data confirms that High is the best setting at 4K, with an average of 68.7 FPS. Users with 4K displays should stick to High or lower to maintain smooth frame rates.

In summary, this PC is fully capable of running Lockdown Protocol at 1080p and 1440p with maximum settings, and at 4K with High settings. The performance is strong enough for both casual and competitive play, with no resolution presenting a major challenge except for 4K Ultra, which is best avoided.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For users considering this combination, the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context on what similar hardware might achieve. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X has an average benchmark score of 37943, and its closest rivals include the Intel Core i9-14901E with an average score of 37911 (0.1% lower), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with a score of 37904 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core 5 211E with a score of 37829 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 with a score of 37804 (0.4% lower). These CPUs would likely deliver very similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, as their benchmark scores are nearly identical to the Ryzen 7 9700X.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT has an average benchmark score of 48477. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile with a score of 47743 (1.5% lower), the Intel Arc A550M with a score of 49737 (2.5% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti with a score of 49957 (3% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 with a score of 50001 (3% higher). The performance differences are small, ranging from 1.5% to 3%, which suggests that these GPUs would produce comparable frame rates in Lockdown Protocol. The RTX 5070 Ti and RX Vega 64 are slightly faster, while the RTX A1000 Mobile is slightly slower, but all would stay within a few FPS of the RX 6800 XT at each resolution and preset.

For users looking at alternative builds, a system with the Intel Core i9-14901E and an RTX 5070 Ti would likely perform within a few percent of this combination, given the small benchmark deltas. Similarly, a setup with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and an RX Vega 64 would be closely matched. The data shows that this specific CPU-GPU pairing is well within the mainstream performance envelope, and users can expect similar results from any of these near-identical alternatives.

Best Settings per Resolution

The optimal settings for each resolution are determined by the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data provides clear guidance for each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it delivers an average of 115.4 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, and it is the highest quality setting available. Users can enjoy maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. The Low preset offers 238.5 FPS for those who prioritize frame rate over visuals, but Ultra is recommended for the best balance.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also stands out as the best setting, with an average of 82.4 FPS. This exceeds the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin, allowing for high-quality graphics at a resolution that is becoming increasingly common. The Medium preset at 128.1 FPS and High at 112.6 FPS are also viable, but Ultra provides the best visual experience while staying well above the playable limit.

At 3840x2160, the High preset is the most demanding option that remains playable, averaging 68.7 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS threshold, though the margin is smaller than at lower resolutions. The Medium preset at 79.8 FPS and Low at 114.4 FPS are also playable, but High offers the best visual quality without dropping below the threshold. The Ultra preset at 54.1 FPS is not recommended, as it falls short of the playable standard.

These settings ensure that users can achieve smooth gameplay at each resolution, with the highest quality preset that maintains at least 60 FPS. The data shows that 1080p and 1440p can be maxed out, while 4K users should opt for High to stay within the playable range.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT combination ranks 1180 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the top third of all systems tested, indicating that it is a capable configuration for this game. The percentile rankings for the individual components support this finding: the CPU is in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 85th percentile among all GPUs. These high percentile scores suggest that both components are well above average, which translates to strong performance in most games, including Lockdown Protocol.

The combo rank of 1180 out of 3714 means that roughly 68% of tested systems are faster, but this is a broad comparison that includes many high-end configurations. Given that the game is an FPS title with a 2024 release date, the rank indicates that this combination is more than adequate for smooth gameplay, as evidenced by the measured FPS data. The system outperforms the majority of tested hardware, and it is particularly well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it achieves frame rates well above the playable threshold.

The data shows that this combo is a solid mid-to-high-end option, with the CPU and GPU both ranking in the mid-80s percentile. Users can expect consistent performance across a wide range of games, and in Lockdown Protocol specifically, the measured results confirm that it is a reliable choice for both high-refresh-rate and 4K gaming, with the appropriate settings adjustments. The rank of 1180 out of 3714 is a strong showing, and it reflects the balanced nature of this pairing.