Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 42 | 50 | 66 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 64 | 76 | 108 |
| 1080p Full HD | 67 | 90 | 106 | 144 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 delivers a highly playable Lockdown Protocol experience at 1080p and 1440p, though 4K requires a significant settings compromise. This combination of a modern 8-core Zen 5 processor with a RDNA 2 mid-range GPU produces average frame rates that range from 144 FPS at 1080p Low down to 34.7 FPS at 2160p Ultra. The data indicates the CPU has ample headroom for this title, with the GPU becoming the primary performance limiter as resolution and graphical fidelity increase.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this PC in Lockdown Protocol?
A: The most demanding fully playable configuration is 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which produces an average of 67.3 FPS. At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, averaging 63.7 FPS. For 4K, only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 66.4 FPS.
Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: Yes, benchmark results indicate that 2560x1440 is playable on High, Medium, and Low presets. The High preset averages 63.7 FPS, Medium averages 76 FPS, and Low reaches 108.2 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the threshold at 49.5 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700X has an average benchmark score of 37943, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14901E, scores 37911, a difference of just 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is similarly close at 37904.
Q: Is the RX 6600 a strong performer relative to other GPUs?
A: The GPU sits in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 19036. Its closest competitor, the NVIDIA Quadro K6000, scores 19030, representing a negligible 0% performance difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile trails by only 0.1% with a score of 19049.
Q: What settings are required for 60 FPS at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only playable option, producing an average of 66.4 FPS. Medium drops to 50.4 FPS, High falls to 42.1 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 34.7 FPS, all below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Lockdown Protocol?
A: The combination ranks 2934 out of 3714 tested combos, placing it in the lower portion of the overall distribution but still capable of delivering playable performance at common resolutions.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions and presets reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 7 9700X and the RX 6600 in Lockdown Protocol. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates strong CPU-bound behavior, with the Low preset achieving 144 FPS. The transition from Low to Medium reduces performance by 26.5% to 105.8 FPS, while High drops further to 90.2 FPS. The Ultra preset at 67.3 FPS represents a 53.3% reduction from the Low setting, indicating that graphical effects are beginning to strain the GPU even at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's influence becomes more pronounced. The Low preset still delivers a robust 108.2 FPS, but the scaling penalty from Low to Ultra is steeper at 54.2%, resulting in 49.5 FPS. The High preset at 63.7 FPS sits just above the playable threshold, while Medium at 76 FPS offers a comfortable buffer. The data shows that the RX 6600's 8 GB of memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors as texture and shading demands increase at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The Low preset manages 66.4 FPS, but every step up in quality incurs a substantial penalty: Medium drops 24.1% to 50.4 FPS, High falls another 16.5% to 42.1 FPS, and Ultra reaches only 34.7 FPS. This 47.7% total reduction from Low to Ultra at 4K contrasts with the 53.3% reduction at 1080p, suggesting that at lower resolutions the CPU can partially compensate for GPU limitations, while at 4K the RX 6600's raw throughput dictates performance entirely.
The Ryzen 7 9700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 5 architecture, provides sufficient processing power to avoid bottlenecking the RX 6600 at any tested setting. The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 3023 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1280, ensures that frame pacing remains consistent even when the GPU is saturated. However, the 65W TDP and Granite Ridge design prioritize efficiency over raw multi-threaded muscle, which is adequate for this FPS title. The data indicates that users seeking higher 4K performance would benefit more from a GPU upgrade than a CPU change.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the Ryzen 7 9700X's nearest rivals in aggregate benchmark performance are all within a 0.4% margin. The Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37911, just 0.1% lower, making it a nearly identical performer for Lockdown Protocol's CPU demands. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, a mobile-class chip, achieves 37904 with a 0.1% delta, suggesting that laptop users with this processor would see similar frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core 5 211E trails by 0.3% at 37829, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 sits 0.4% behind at 37804. These results indicate that any of these processors would deliver equivalent in-game performance, as Lockdown Protocol does not appear to stress multi-threaded workloads beyond what these chips provide.
On the GPU side, the RX 6600's nearest rivals show remarkable parity in synthetic benchmarks. The NVIDIA Quadro K6000 matches the RX 6600's average score of 19036 with a delta of 0%, meaning users upgrading from that workstation card would see no measurable difference in frame rates. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, despite being a laptop part, scores 19049 and is 0.1% faster, which could translate to similar FPS in this game at comparable settings. The NVIDIA Tesla K20m offers a 0.3% advantage at 19089, while the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation falls 0.4% behind at 18954. For Lockdown Protocol specifically, the measured FPS data shows that these GPUs would likely produce nearly identical results at each resolution and preset, given their benchmark proximity.
It is worth remembering the RX 6600's nearest rivals span very different market segments, from professional workstation cards to mobile gaming GPUs. This suggests that Lockdown Protocol's performance is not highly sensitive to architectural differences among GPUs with similar raw compute scores, and the 8 GB memory capacity appears sufficient for the tested presets. The RTX 4050 Mobile's inclusion is particularly notable, as it indicates that a mid-range laptop GPU can match the desktop RX 6600 in this title.
The Verdict
This PC can run Lockdown Protocol with playable performance, but the experience varies significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on every preset, with Ultra achieving 67.3 FPS and Low reaching 144 FPS. This makes 1080p the optimal resolution for visual fidelity, as users can enable Ultra settings without sacrificing smoothness. The verdict data identifies Ultra as the best settings choice at this resolution, with the average FPS of 67.3 providing a modest buffer above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on High, Medium, and Low presets, but Ultra falls short at 49.5 FPS. The recommendation is High settings, which produce 63.7 FPS — this represents the best balance of visual quality and performance, though users prioritizing frame rate could opt for Medium at 76 FPS or Low at 108.2 FPS. The 1440p experience is viable for competitive play, but the margin above 60 FPS is slim on the highest playable preset.
For 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves playable performance at 66.4 FPS. Medium at 50.4 FPS, High at 42.1 FPS, and Ultra at 34.7 FPS all fall below the threshold. The data suggests that 4K gaming is possible only with significant graphical compromises, and users with 4K displays should expect a visually basic experience. The Low preset at 4K does maintain a 6.4 FPS margin above the threshold, but frame rate dips could push it below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. Overall, this combination is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for users willing to sacrifice visual quality.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured average frame rates span a wide range. The Low preset delivers 144 FPS, representing the maximum performance ceiling for this combination. Medium reduces this to 105.8 FPS, a 26.5% decrease. High settings produce 90.2 FPS, while Ultra drops to 67.3 FPS — the lowest playable result at this resolution. All four presets exceed the 60 FPS threshold, with Low providing more than double the required frame rate.
At 2560x1440, performance scales predictably with settings. Low achieves 108.2 FPS, maintaining a strong margin above the threshold. Medium follows at 76 FPS, a 29.8% reduction from Low. High settings yield 63.7 FPS, just 3.7 FPS above the playability cutoff. Ultra drops to 49.5 FPS, marking the first sub-60 FPS result in this resolution. The gap between Low and Ultra is 58.7 FPS, indicating substantial GPU headroom at lower settings.
At 3840x2160, all presets show significant performance degradation. Low is the only playable option at 66.4 FPS. Medium drops to 50.4 FPS, a 24.1% penalty. High further reduces to 42.1 FPS, while Ultra bottoms out at 34.7 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra represents a 47.7% total performance loss. The data shows that the RX 6600's 8 GB memory capacity and 128-bit bus become limiting factors at this resolution, with even Low settings requiring careful optimization to maintain playability.
How This Combo Ranks
The Ryzen 7 9700X and RX 6600 combination ranks 2934 out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the 21st percentile of all configurations. This rank reflects the GPU's mid-range position rather than CPU limitations, as the 9700X's 86th percentile CPU ranking is substantially higher. The combo's overall standing suggests that while it handles this game competently at mainstream resolutions, many alternative pairings with stronger GPUs would deliver superior frame rates, particularly at higher settings.
The rank disparity between the CPU and GPU components highlights an imbalance in this pairing. The 9700X sits near the top of the CPU hierarchy, but the RX 6600's 63rd percentile GPU ranking drags the overall combo down. Benchmark results indicate that users with this CPU could achieve significantly better Lockdown Protocol performance by pairing it with a more powerful GPU, as the processor has ample headroom to support higher frame rates. Conversely, the RX 6600 would be better matched with a less powerful CPU to avoid leaving performance on the table. For the current configuration, the data shows that playable performance is achievable at 1080p and 1440p, but the combo rank of 2934 out of 3714 reflects its position as a mid-tier solution rather than a high-end one.