Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

69%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
235 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
109 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
172 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
80 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
111 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
52 FPS
6.8ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 69,996
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 11,627

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 52 69 79 111
1440p QHD 80 107 122 172
1080p Full HD 109 146 167 235

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 146
1920x1080 Low 235
1920x1080 Medium 167
1920x1080 Ultra 109
2560x1440 High 107
2560x1440 Low 172
2560x1440 Medium 122
2560x1440 Ultra 80
3840x2160 High 69
3840x2160 Low 111
3840x2160 Medium 79
3840x2160 Ultra 52

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT combination delivers a robust 1080p and 1440p experience in Lockdown Protocol, with 4K remaining viable at high settings. Benchmark results show this pairing scales effectively across resolutions, with the CPU providing a solid foundation for the GPU to stretch its legs at lower resolutions. The data indicates a clear hierarchy: 1080p is thoroughly conquered, 1440p offers headroom for maximum settings, and 4K requires some compromise but remains playable.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates exceptional performance across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 235 FPS, which is more than enough for high-refresh-rate monitors. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 167 FPS with minimums of 142 FPS and maximums of 192 FPS, indicating smooth frame pacing. High settings deliver 146 FPS average, while Ultra still maintains a strong 109 FPS average. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 54% reduction in frame rate, but even the most demanding preset clears the 60 FPS playability threshold by a wide margin.

At 2560x1440, performance remains impressive. Low settings yield 172 FPS average, Medium produces 122 FPS with minimums of 104 FPS and maximums of 141 FPS, and High delivers 107 FPS. Ultra settings still hold at 80 FPS average, which is comfortably above the playability threshold. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 26% performance at Ultra settings, a predictable penalty that still leaves ample headroom.

The 3840x2160 results show where the system begins to strain. Low settings produce 111 FPS average, Medium hits 79 FPS with minimums of 67 FPS and maximums of 91 FPS, and High maintains 69 FPS. Ultra drops to 52 FPS average, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra unplayable at 4K, but the three lower presets all clear 60 FPS. The gap between Medium and High at 4K is only 10 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns at this resolution.

Frame time consistency appears strongest at Medium settings across all resolutions, as those are the only configurations with reported minimum and maximum values. At 1080p Medium, the spread from minimum to maximum is 50 FPS, while at 1440p Medium it is 37 FPS, and at 4K Medium it is 24 FPS. This tighter spread at higher resolutions indicates the GPU becomes the limiting factor, reducing variance.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, show it sits in a tightly contested performance band. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 0.2% higher, while the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X trails by 0.7%, and the Intel Core i7-14700K is 0.9% behind. These deltas are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning any of these CPUs paired with the RX 7800 XT would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol.

The GPU's nearest rivals present a more interesting comparison. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 scores 0.5% lower on average, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M is 0.9% higher. The NVIDIA Tesla K20c scores 1.3% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT is 1.8% lower. Despite the RX 7800 XT's 51st percentile ranking among all GPUs, these rivals are all within a 3% band, suggesting that in this specific benchmark context, the RX 7800 XT performs similarly to much older or lower-tier hardware. This is likely due to the game's engine favoring certain architectural features.

For practical building advice, swapping the Ryzen 7 9700F for a Ryzen 9 7940HX or Core i7-14700KF would yield virtually identical CPU-bound performance in Lockdown Protocol. On the GPU side, the data suggests that a GTX 1660 or RX 6500 XT would provide comparable frame rates to the RX 7800 XT in this particular game, though those cards lack the 16 GB VRAM and modern feature set. The RX 7800 XT's 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are not directly reflected in the nearest rival scores.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear pattern of GPU scaling across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system hits 235 FPS, while at 4K Low it drops to 111 FPS, a 53% reduction. This indicates the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as resolution rises. Conversely, the CPU's role is most pronounced at lower resolutions where frame rates are highest. The Ryzen 7 9700F's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, provide sufficient headroom to avoid bottlenecking the RX 7800 XT at 1080p.

Preset scaling further illustrates this division. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra costs 126 FPS (from 235 to 109), a 54% drop. At 1440p, the same preset change costs 92 FPS (from 172 to 80), a 53% drop. At 4K, the cost is 59 FPS (from 111 to 52), also a 53% drop. This consistent percentage scaling across resolutions suggests the GPU handles the graphical load proportionally, while the CPU maintains stable frame delivery.

The CPU's single-thread score of 4691 in Passmark and multithread score of 36470 indicate strong per-core performance. This matters for Lockdown Protocol, which likely relies on a few heavily loaded threads for game logic. The 0.2% delta to the Ryzen 9 7940HX and 0.7% delta to the Ryzen 9 7950X show that the 9700F does not leave significant performance on the table in CPU-bound scenarios.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The fact that High settings average 69 FPS while Ultra drops to 52 FPS shows that the RX 7800 XT's 37.32 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 233.3 GPixel/s pixel rate are stretched at higher presets. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient, but the shading units and ROPs limit performance at 4K Ultra. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU and GPU are better balanced, with neither component clearly dominating the other.

The Verdict

The system can run Lockdown Protocol above 60 FPS at all tested resolutions, with specific preset limitations at 4K. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 109 FPS. This makes 1080p fully playable with maximum settings. At 2560x1440, the same full range is playable, with Ultra averaging 80 FPS. Gamers targeting 1440p can enable every visual option without concern.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. High, Low, and Medium all average above 60 FPS, with High being the best playable setting at 69 FPS. Ultra drops to 52 FPS, which fails the playability threshold. For 4K users, the recommendation is to use High settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The data shows that Medium at 4K offers 79 FPS with tight frame times (67 minimum to 91 maximum), making it a viable alternative if slightly lower visual fidelity is acceptable.

The playable settings list from the verdict data confirms these findings: 4K has three playable presets, while 1440p and 1080p each have all four. The best settings at each resolution are High at 4K (69 FPS), Ultra at 1440p (80 FPS), and Ultra at 1080p (109 FPS). This suggests the system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K as a secondary option requiring preset compromises.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination ranks 1235th out of 3714 tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the 33rd percentile of all tested combos, meaning roughly two-thirds of tested configurations outperform it. However, this ranking must be interpreted carefully given the game's recent release date of 2024-03-11 and the rapid pace of hardware releases. The rank reflects the aggregate performance across all resolutions and presets, not just the best-case scenario.

The 51st percentile ranking of the GPU among all GPUs, combined with the CPU's 94th percentile ranking, suggests an imbalance. The CPU is far stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. This means the combo's ranking is likely GPU-limited in most scenarios. If the RX 7800 XT were paired with a weaker CPU, the ranking might not change significantly, but pairing the Ryzen 7 9700F with a stronger GPU would likely improve the combo's standing.

The delta between the CPU's rivals (all within 1% of the 9700F) and the GPU's rivals (all within 2% of the 7800 XT) shows that neither component is an outlier in its performance class. The combo's 1235th rank out of 3714 is a mid-pack result, consistent with a mid-range GPU paired with a high-end CPU. For context, the CPU's nearest rival, the Ryzen 9 7950X, is a flagship part, while the GPU's rivals include the GTX 1660, a much older and cheaper card.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average FPS is 52, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The best playable 4K setting is High, which averages 69 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for maximum visual quality with this combo?

A: At 2560x1440, Ultra settings average 80 FPS, providing the highest visual quality while maintaining smooth performance. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 109 FPS, which is also excellent but at a lower resolution.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to the Ryzen 9 7950X in this game?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F scores 0.7% higher than the Ryzen 9 7950X in average benchmark scores. This difference is negligible for gaming performance, so either CPU would produce nearly identical frame rates.

Q: Is the RX 7800 XT a strong performer in Lockdown Protocol?

A: The GPU ranks in the 51st percentile among all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the GTX 1660 and RX 6500 XT, which score within 2% of it. This suggests the RX 7800 XT performs similarly to those older cards in this specific game.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 High, the average FPS is 146. The system has substantial headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, making this a smooth experience even on high-refresh-rate displays.

Q: Does the system maintain consistent frame times?

A: The only reported minimum and maximum values are at Medium settings. At 4K Medium, the range is 67 to 91 FPS; at 1440p Medium, it is 104 to 141 FPS; and at 1080p Medium, it is 142 to 192 FPS. These ranges indicate good frame pacing, though data for other presets is unavailable.