Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 32 | 45 | 51 | 75 |
| 1440p QHD | 54 | 68 | 80 | 111 |
| 1080p Full HD | 72 | 94 | 108 | 151 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a highly capable 1080p experience in Lockdown Protocol, with performance scaling predictably as resolution increases. At 4K, the combination becomes heavily constrained, dropping below the 60 FPS threshold at most presets. The data shows a clear hierarchy: 1080p offers full preset flexibility, 1440p requires a moderate preset selection, and 4K is limited to the lowest settings for smooth gameplay.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination produces its strongest results. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 151.4, providing a significant headroom above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 108 FPS, still a comfortable margin. High settings yield 94.4 FPS average, and even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 71.5 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a performance cost of roughly 80 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the primary scaling factor at this resolution, though the CPU's 3D V-Cache helps maintain frame pacing.
At 2560x1440, the average FPS figures compress considerably. Low settings produce 110.5 FPS average, which is a 27% reduction compared to 1080p Low. Medium settings deliver 80 FPS average, while High settings drop to 68.2 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the playable threshold at 54.3 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 56 FPS, narrower than at 1080p, suggesting that resolution scaling is beginning to tax the GPU more heavily.
At 3840x2160, the performance picture changes dramatically. Low settings remain playable with an average of 75.2 FPS, but this is the only preset that clears 60 FPS. Medium settings drop to 51.2 FPS average, High settings fall to 45.1 FPS, and Ultra plummets to 31.8 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 4K is 43 FPS, and the overall performance is roughly half of what the same settings achieve at 1080p. This indicates that the Arc B580's 12 GB memory bus and 456 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-fidelity 4K rendering in this title.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best settings that stay at or above 60 FPS are Ultra, with an average of 71.5 FPS. This is the maximum visual quality preset available, and the combination handles it without dipping below the playable threshold. For users prioritizing maximum fidelity, this is the optimal configuration.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are High, delivering 68.2 FPS average. This preset offers a balance between visual quality and performance, staying just above the 60 FPS line. The Ultra preset fails to maintain playability at 54.3 FPS, so High is the recommended ceiling.
At 3840x2160, the best settings are Low, with an average of 75.2 FPS. This is the only preset that clears the playable threshold at this resolution. Medium and High both fall short at 51.2 FPS and 45.1 FPS respectively, while Ultra is unplayable at 31.8 FPS. Users targeting 4K must accept minimal visual settings.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 1080p with maximum settings?
A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 71.5 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the best settings configuration for this resolution, and the combination maintains smooth performance.
Q: What is the highest playable preset at 1440p?
A: High settings at 2560x1440 average 68.2 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS. Ultra settings fall short at 54.3 FPS average, so users should avoid that preset for consistent playability.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: Only with Low settings, which average 75.2 FPS. Medium settings drop to 51.2 FPS, and High falls to 45.1 FPS, both below the playable threshold. Ultra is not viable at 31.8 FPS average.
Q: How does the performance scale from 1080p to 4K?
A: At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 151.4 at 1080p to 110.5 at 1440p and 75.2 at 4K. This represents a 50% reduction from 1080p to 4K, indicating that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.
Q: What is the average FPS difference between Low and Ultra at each resolution?
A: At 1080p, the difference is 79.9 FPS (151.4 vs 71.5). At 1440p, the difference is 56.2 FPS (110.5 vs 54.3). At 4K, the difference is 43.4 FPS (75.2 vs 31.8). The narrowing gap at higher resolutions suggests the GPU is saturating.
Q: Does the 7800X3D bottleneck the Arc B580 in this game?
A: The data indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions, as evidenced by the high FPS at 1080p Low (151.4). However, the performance drop at 4K suggests the GPU is the primary constraint, not the CPU.
The Verdict
This combination can run Lockdown Protocol, but the playable experience depends entirely on resolution and preset selection. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 71.5 FPS. This is the ideal scenario for this hardware.
At 2560x1440, three presets are playable: Low (110.5 FPS), Medium (80 FPS), and High (68.2 FPS). The Ultra preset falls short at 54.3 FPS, so users should stick to High or below for consistent performance.
At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, averaging 75.2 FPS. Medium (51.2 FPS), High (45.1 FPS), and Ultra (31.8 FPS) all fail to meet the 60 FPS requirement. The verdict is clear: this PC is a strong 1080p performer, a capable 1440p machine with preset compromises, and a marginal 4K option limited to lowest quality.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals distinct roles for the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the high FPS figures—151.4 on Low and 94.4 on High—indicate that the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 96 MB L3 cache and 8-core/16-thread configuration is more than sufficient to feed the Arc B580. The performance scaling between presets at this resolution is steep, suggesting the GPU is the primary driver of frame rate changes.
At 2560x1440, the scaling between presets narrows, with Low at 110.5 FPS and Ultra at 54.3 FPS. This compression indicates that the GPU is becoming more stressed as pixel count increases, but the CPU still provides adequate headroom. The 27% drop from 1080p Low to 1440p Low suggests resolution is now a factor, but the CPU is not the limiting component.
At 3840x2160, the GPU clearly dominates the performance equation. The 75.2 FPS on Low settings versus 31.8 FPS on Ultra shows that the Arc B580's compute resources—2560 shading units and 13.67 TFLOPS FP32—are the bottleneck. The CPU's role diminishes at this resolution, as the frame rate is constrained by the GPU's ability to process the increased pixel workload. The 456 GB/s memory bandwidth is also a limiting factor at 4K, as the data shows a more than 50% performance drop from 1080p.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2842 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all possible configurations, reflecting its strengths at lower resolutions but weaknesses at higher ones. The percentile ranking for the CPU is 83%, indicating it outperforms most processors in general benchmarks, while the GPU sits at 68%, which is above average but not exceptional.
The combo rank suggests that while the individual components are competent, the pairing does not boost the system to top-tier status in this specific game. The Arc B580's benchmark scores—including a Passmark G3D score of 15748 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068—are respectable, but the 7800X3D's strong single-thread and multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 scores of 1713 and 16817 respectively) cannot compensate for the GPU's limitations at high resolutions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, Intel Core i7-13650HX, and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, all with an average score of approximately 33089 and a deltaPct of 0. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is slightly lower at 33201 with a deltaPct of -0.4. These processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Lockdown Protocol, meaning users swapping between them would see no meaningful difference in frame rates at 1080p.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (avg score 23061, deltaPct -0.2), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (avg score 22895, deltaPct 0.6), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (avg score 23172, deltaPct -0.7), and NVIDIA P106-100 (avg score 23249, deltaPct -1). These cards would behave similarly to the Arc B580 in terms of raw performance, though the RTX 3080 and RTX 2080 may offer better driver optimization for older titles. However, the deltaPct values are all within 1%, so the practical FPS differences in Lockdown Protocol would be minimal. The Arc B580's 12 GB memory capacity is a distinguishing feature, but it does not translate to a significant advantage in this game's measured performance.