Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 48 | 64 | 78 | 105 |
| 1440p QHD | 77 | 104 | 119 | 168 |
| 1080p Full HD | 107 | 140 | 161 | 228 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti delivers a robust gaming experience in Lockdown Protocol, with benchmark results showing that this combination comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold at most presets. The measured data indicates that the system is capable of high refresh rate gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, while still maintaining playable frame rates at 4K with adjusted settings. This analysis breaks down the performance characteristics across resolutions, settings, and component roles based strictly on the provided measured FPS data and hardware benchmarks.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which produces an average frame rate of 64 FPS. The data shows that Medium also clears the threshold at 78.3 FPS, but High represents the best visual quality option while remaining playable. Ultra at this resolution falls below the playability threshold, averaging only 48.4 FPS, making it unsuitable for consistent gameplay.
At 2560x1440, the system can handle the highest quality preset without issue. Ultra settings deliver an average of 76.9 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS floor. The scaling from High to Ultra at this resolution shows a drop from 104 FPS to 76.9 FPS, yet both remain firmly in playable territory. Since Ultra is the most demanding preset available and it clears the threshold with a comfortable margin, it is the recommended choice for 1440p.
For 1920x1080, the RTX 3070 Ti and Ryzen 7 7700X combination easily handles Ultra settings, achieving an average of 107.1 FPS. This is nearly double the playability threshold, indicating substantial headroom for high refresh rate monitors. The performance gap between High and Ultra at 1080p is relatively small, with High at 139.6 FPS and Ultra at 107.1 FPS, so users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity can do so without sacrificing smoothness.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, at 3840x2160 the system achieves playable frame rates on High, Medium, and Low settings. The average FPS for High is 64, for Medium is 78.3, and for Low is 104.7. Ultra settings at 4K are not playable, averaging only 48.4 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 76.9 FPS, making it the best choice for visual quality while staying above the 60 FPS threshold. All four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at this resolution.
Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti compare to its nearest GPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 29945, which puts it 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (29928) and 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (29783). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6800 by 0.5% (30095) and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 by 1.6% (30433).
Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at lower resolutions?
A: The data shows significant FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K, with Ultra settings dropping from 107.1 FPS at 1920x1080 to 48.4 FPS at 3840x2160. The CPU’s single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2289) and multi-thread performance (Geekbench multi-core score of 12451) suggest it is capable, but the frame rate scaling indicates GPU load increases substantially at higher resolutions.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, Low settings average 228 FPS, while Ultra averages 107.1 FPS. This represents a performance reduction of approximately 53% when moving from the lowest to the highest quality preset, yet both remain far above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: Does the combo rank highly among tested configurations?
A: The combination ranks 1305 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the 64.9th percentile of all tested systems. This indicates it performs better than the majority of configurations in the database.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the system shows a clear progression across settings. Low settings produce an average of 104.7 FPS, Medium increases visual quality while dropping to 78.3 FPS, High further reduces performance to 64 FPS, and Ultra falls to 48.4 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 53.8% reduction in average frame rate, demonstrating that the GPU is the primary constraint at this resolution. All settings except Ultra remain above the 60 FPS threshold, giving users three viable options for 4K play.
At 2560x1440, performance is strong across the board. Low settings average 167.7 FPS, Medium delivers 118.9 FPS, High achieves 104 FPS, and Ultra maintains 76.9 FPS. The transition from Low to Ultra reduces performance by 54.1%, similar to the scaling observed at 4K. Notably, the gap between Medium and High is relatively small at 14.9 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra is larger at 27.1 FPS. Every preset at this resolution exceeds the playability threshold, with even the most demanding option providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the system reaches its highest frame rates. Low settings average 228 FPS, Medium produces 160.5 FPS, High delivers 139.6 FPS, and Ultra maintains 107.1 FPS. The performance scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 53% reduction, consistent with the other resolutions. The absolute numbers indicate that this combination is well-suited for high refresh rate gaming at 1080p, with even Ultra settings providing more than 100 FPS on average. The data shows that the RTX 3070 Ti has substantial headroom at this resolution, making it likely that CPU limitations could become relevant at the lowest settings where frame rates exceed 200 FPS.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X has an average benchmark score of 35909 and sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are extremely close in performance: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 scores 35802 (0.3% slower), the Intel Core 7 250H scores 35728 (0.5% slower), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 35719 (0.5% slower), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H scores 35670 (0.7% slower). These differences are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol when paired with the same GPU.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 29945 and ranks in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. The closest competitors are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile at 29928 (0.1% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30095 (0.5% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti at 29783 (0.5% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 at 30433 (1.6% faster). In practical terms, users with any of these GPUs would experience very similar performance in Lockdown Protocol, with frame rate differences likely within the margin of error. The RX 6700 shows the largest delta at 1.6%, which could translate to roughly 1-2 FPS difference at 4K Ultra settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ranks 1305 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places the system in the upper third of all configurations in the database, specifically at the 64.9th percentile. The ranking reflects the balance between the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19088) and the GPU’s solid but not top-tier capabilities. The CPU outperforms 85% of all processors, while the GPU outperforms 75% of all graphics cards, which together produce a system that handles this FPS title well but does not reach the highest echelons of the ranking.
The rank of 1305 suggests that while this combo is capable, there are many systems with more powerful GPUs that achieve higher frame rates at demanding settings. The measured FPS data supports this interpretation: at 4K Ultra the system falls below 60 FPS, which is a common threshold for high-end gaming. However, the system’s ability to maintain playable frame rates at 4K High and excellent performance at 1440p and 1080p indicates that it is well-matched for most gaming scenarios.
The Verdict
According to the verdict by resolution, this PC can run Lockdown Protocol with playable frame rates at all three tested resolutions, provided the right settings are selected. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best option at 64 FPS average. At 2560x1440, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with Ultra delivering 76.9 FPS. At 1920x1080, all presets are also playable, with Ultra achieving 107.1 FPS.
The system clears the 60 FPS threshold at every resolution with at least one preset. The most demanding situation is 4K Ultra, which falls short at 48.4 FPS, but dropping to High restores playability. For users with 1440p or 1080p monitors, this system provides a fully playable experience at maximum settings, with frame rates well above 60 FPS. The data confirms that this is a capable gaming configuration for Lockdown Protocol, with the only compromise required at 4K resolution where users must choose between High and Ultra settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the CPU and GPU contribute differently to Lockdown Protocol. Looking at Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 107.1 at 1080p to 76.9 at 1440p and finally to 48.4 at 4K. This represents a 28.2% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a further 37.1% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The consistent degradation as resolution increases indicates that the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck at higher pixel counts, which is typical for a graphically demanding FPS title.
The CPU’s role is more apparent at lower resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080 Low, the system achieves 228 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that requires strong single-thread performance. The Ryzen 7 7700X delivers a 3DMark single-thread score of 1090 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4190, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. This suggests the CPU provides sufficient headroom for high refresh rate gaming at 1080p, though the exact frame rate ceiling would depend on the game’s engine and optimization.
At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. The RTX 3070 Ti’s 8 GB of GDDR6X memory and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth are taxed heavily at 3840x2160, particularly at Ultra settings where the 48.4 FPS result falls below the playability threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K shows a 53.8% performance drop, which is nearly identical to the scaling at 1080p (53%), indicating that the GPU’s relative load increases proportionally with resolution. The CPU’s benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19088, suggest it has enough processing power to avoid becoming a constraint at any resolution tested. The data indicates that users seeking higher frame rates at 4K would benefit more from a GPU upgrade, while the CPU is well-suited for this game across all tested configurations.