Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

74%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
175 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
81 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
128 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
60 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
83 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
39 FPS
9.2ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 35,909
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 16,014

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 51 59 83
1440p QHD 60 80 91 128
1080p Full HD 81 109 124 175

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 109
1920x1080 Low 175
1920x1080 Medium 124
1920x1080 Ultra 81
2560x1440 High 80
2560x1440 Low 128
2560x1440 Medium 91
2560x1440 Ultra 60
3840x2160 High 51
3840x2160 Low 83
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 Ultra 39

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 presents a compelling mid-range analysis for Lockdown Protocol, a fast-paced FPS. The data reveals a system that is exceptionally well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but which encounters its first significant hurdles at 4K resolution. The benchmark results indicate a clear performance hierarchy across the three resolutions and four presets tested, offering a detailed look at how this specific CPU and GPU combination scales with graphical demands.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combo show a predictable pattern of declining performance as resolution and graphical fidelity increase, yet the margins between settings reveal the headroom available at lower resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the system operates with a vast surplus of performance. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 175, providing an exceptionally fluid experience for competitive play. Moving to Medium settings, the average FPS drops to 124, with a minimum of 106 and a maximum of 143, showing that even the dips remain well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. High settings yield an average of 109 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra preset still delivers a robust 81 FPS average. This indicates that at 1080p, the GPU is rarely the limiting factor, and the player can prioritize visual quality without sacrificing competitive frame rates.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but the scaling becomes more evident. Low settings produce an average of 128 FPS, which is still an excellent figure for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset averages 91 FPS, with a minimum of 77 and a maximum of 105, demonstrating solid consistency. High settings are slightly more demanding, yielding an 80 FPS average. The Ultra preset lands precisely on the 60 FPS threshold, averaging exactly 60 FPS. This marks the first point where the system's performance aligns exactly with the playability standard, suggesting that any future updates or more demanding scenes could push it below the target.

The 3840x2160 resolution presents a significant challenge for this hardware combination. Here, the scaling from 1440p is steep, and the GPU's 8 GB of memory and 128-bit bus become more apparent. Low settings are the only fully playable option, achieving an average of 83 FPS. The Medium preset averages 59 FPS, with a minimum of 50 and a maximum of 68, placing it just below the 60 FPS playability threshold and showing notable frame-time variance. High settings drop further to a 51 FPS average, while the Ultra preset falls to 39 FPS, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the extensive database of tested configurations, this combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and AMD Radeon RX 9060 holds a rank of 2194 out of 3714 combos for Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the 59th percentile of all tested systems, indicating that it outperforms a majority of configurations but is not at the top tier of performance. This mid-pack ranking is logical, given that the GPU itself sits at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU is considerably more powerful, ranking in the 85th percentile among all CPUs.

The data suggests that this combo is not an extreme outlier in either direction; it is a balanced pairing where the GPU's performance is the primary determinant of its overall standing in the game. The CPU has significant headroom, as evidenced by its high benchmark scores, but the RX 9060's capabilities cap the system's overall potential in this graphics-intensive title. This ranking implies that while the combo is very capable, there are many other systems that can achieve higher frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU is stressed.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for both components provides context for what other hardware would deliver a similar experience. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X has an average benchmark score of 35909. Its closest rivals show negligible performance differences, meaning a user would see virtually no change in CPU-bound scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is a mere 0.3% slower, while the Intel Core 7 250H and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 are 0.5% slower. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is also very close, at 0.7% slower. These tiny deltas imply that in a game like Lockdown Protocol, which relies heavily on the GPU, swapping the 7700X for any of these processors would result in no measurable difference in frame rates.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014. Its nearest rivals are equally tightly clustered. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a direct competitor, with an average score only 0.7% higher. This suggests that a system with an RTX 3060 Ti and a similar CPU would produce nearly identical performance in Lockdown Protocol. The AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon RX 7700 are both 1% faster, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 2.1% faster. These are all very minor differences that would be within the margin of error for in-game benchmarking. Therefore, any of these GPU alternatives paired with the 7700X would behave in a very similar way, yielding frame rates within a few percentage points across all resolutions and settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 1920x1080 with maximum settings?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset, the measured average FPS is 81, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data confirms all four settings presets at this resolution are playable.

Q: What is the highest quality setting that maintains 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 achieves an average FPS of exactly 60, making it the most demanding setting that still meets the playability threshold. All other presets (High, Medium, Low) also exceed this target.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable on this hardware?

A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is playable, averaging 83 FPS. The Medium preset falls just below the threshold at 59 FPS, and High and Ultra settings are not viable for smooth gameplay, with averages of 51 and 39 FPS respectively.

Q: How does this combo compare to one using an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The benchmark data shows the RTX 3060 Ti has an average score that is only 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 9060. In practical terms, gaming performance in Lockdown Protocol would be nearly identical between these two GPUs when paired with the same CPU.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X a bottleneck for the Radeon RX 9060 in this game?

A: The data suggests it is not a bottleneck. The CPU ranks in the 85th percentile, while the GPU is in the 59th. The performance scaling from 1080p to 1440p and 4K shows a significant drop-off, which is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario. The CPU has substantial headroom, as indicated by its high benchmark scores.

Q: What is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 1920x1080?

A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 is the most demanding setting that remains playable, with a measured average FPS of 81. This provides the best visual quality while still maintaining a frame rate well above the 60 FPS target.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results reveal a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in this system for Lockdown Protocol. The CPU, with its strong 85th percentile ranking and high multi-threaded scores like the 19088 in Cinebench R23, provides a robust foundation that does not constrain the GPU's output. The performance differences between resolutions are the key indicator of this dynamic.

At 1920x1080, the system is almost certainly GPU-bound, but the GPU has so much headroom that it can easily push high frame rates. The 44% drop from Low (175 FPS) to Ultra (81 FPS) at this resolution shows the GPU's workload scaling with settings. However, the absolute numbers are so high that the CPU's frame generation capability is not being challenged.

When moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's workload increases, and we see a corresponding drop in performance. The average FPS at Ultra drops from 81 at 1080p to 60 at 1440p, a 26% decrease. This scaling points to the GPU becoming a more significant factor, while the CPU continues to provide ample headroom.

The transition to 3840x2160 solidifies the GPU as the primary performance limiter. The Low preset at 4K (83 FPS) is nearly as demanding as the Ultra preset at 1440p (60 FPS), showing that resolution increases strain the GPU far more than CPU-related tasks. The fact that the system cannot maintain 60 FPS on Medium settings at 4K confirms that the Radeon RX 9060 is the limiting component in this pairing. The CPU's role is to feed the GPU efficiently, and its high performance ensures it is not the cause of any frame rate drops observed in the data.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the measured frame rates, the optimal settings for each resolution prioritize the highest visual quality while ensuring the average FPS meets or exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold.

  • 1920x1080: The Ultra preset is the best choice. It delivers an average FPS of 81, which is significantly higher than the 60 FPS target, allowing for maximum visual fidelity without any performance concerns.
  • 2560x1440: The Ultra preset is also the best option here. It achieves an average FPS of exactly 60, which meets the playability threshold. This is the most demanding setting that remains playable, offering the best visual experience at this resolution.
  • 3840x2160: The Low preset is the only viable option for a smooth experience. It yields an average FPS of 83, which is well above the target. While the visual quality is reduced, it is the only way to achieve the frame rates necessary for a responsive FPS game at this resolution. The Medium preset falls below the threshold at 59 FPS.

The Verdict

The data shows that this PC is unequivocally capable of running Lockdown Protocol well. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with the Ultra setting providing an excellent 81 FPS average. At 2560x1440, the system again proves fully capable, with the Ultra preset hitting the exact 60 FPS playability target. However, at 3840x2160, the system's capabilities are strained, and only the Low setting maintains a playable frame rate of 83 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K falls just short of the target at 59 FPS, making it a borderline choice. In summary, this is a powerful 1080p and 1440p gaming machine that can handle Ultra settings, but it is not a high-refresh-rate 4K gaming solution, where users would need to significantly lower graphical settings to achieve smooth performance.