Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 59 | 67 | 95 |
| 1440p QHD | 68 | 91 | 104 | 147 |
| 1080p Full HD | 93 | 124 | 142 | 200 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 ranks 1709th out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol. This places the combination in the 46th percentile of all systems tested, meaning it outperforms nearly half of all configurations while trailing the upper tier. For a mid-range desktop pairing, this is a respectable standing, but it is not a top-tier result. The data indicates this combo is firmly in the "solid mainstream" category—capable of clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold at most settings, but not built for chasing maximum frame rates at 4K Ultra.
The combo's percentile ranking for the CPU (85th vs all CPUs) and GPU (58th vs all GPUs) reveals an interesting asymmetry. The Ryzen 7 7700X is a strong processor relative to the broader market, while the RX 7700 sits closer to the median for graphics cards. In Lockdown Protocol, this translates to a system where the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU has headroom to spare.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X delivers an average benchmark score of 35,909, which is nearly identical to several alternatives. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 scores 35,802 (0.3% lower), the Intel Core 7 250H scores 35,728 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 35,719 (0.5% lower). The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is also close at 35,670 (0.7% lower). In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver virtually indistinguishable frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, as the performance deltas are under one percent. If you were to swap the 7700X for any of these chips, the gaming experience would remain essentially unchanged.
On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 posts an average benchmark score of 15,852. Its nearest competitors are the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15,862 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16,014 (1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15,679 (1.1% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16,129 (1.7% higher). The RTX 3060 Ti is the most notable alternative here, as it is a widely known graphics card that would perform within roughly two percent of the RX 7700 in this game. None of these GPU alternatives would meaningfully shift the frame rates at any resolution or preset.
The implication for buyers is straightforward: the 7700X + RX 7700 combination behaves like a cluster of near-identical systems. The performance differences among the nearest rivals are so small that they fall within run-to-run variance. This means the combo's 1709th rank is not a unique outcome—many similarly equipped systems would land in the same vicinity.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data for Lockdown Protocol reveals a clear pattern of GPU dominance as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the CPU and GPU are relatively balanced, but the GPU begins to assert itself more strongly at higher resolutions.
At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 200 FPS average. Dropping to 1440p Low reduces this to 147 FPS, a 27% decrease. At 4K Low, the average falls to 95 FPS, another 35% drop from 1440p. These substantial reductions as resolution climbs indicate that the RX 7700's rendering throughput is the primary constraint. The CPU, with its 85th percentile standing, is not the bottleneck at these settings.
The scaling across presets at a fixed resolution further confirms this. At 1440p, moving from Low to Medium reduces the average from 147 FPS to 104 FPS (a 29% drop), while High drops to 91 FPS (another 13% reduction), and Ultra falls to 68 FPS (a 25% further drop). The consistent, large penalties for each preset step-up point to GPU-bound performance. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rate penalties would be smaller and would plateau as settings increased.
At 1080p, the pattern is similar but less severe. Low averages 200 FPS, Medium 142 FPS, High 124 FPS, and Ultra 93 FPS. The relative drops are smaller than at 1440p, suggesting the CPU is beginning to play a more meaningful role at this resolution, though the GPU still dominates. The 1080p Low result of 200 FPS is close to what a CPU-bound scenario would look like, but the RX 7700's compute resources are still sufficient to keep pace.
For 4K, the GPU is almost entirely responsible for performance. Ultra averages just 44 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium at 4K averages 67 FPS with a minimum of 57 FPS, indicating the GPU is near its limits. The CPU's role at 4K is minimal—it is unlikely to be the constraint at any preset.
The Verdict
The data shows that this PC can run Lockdown Protocol at playable frame rates across most configurations, but with important caveats at 4K.
At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS at every preset. Ultra settings average 93 FPS, which is well above the playable threshold. High averages 124 FPS, Medium 142 FPS, and Low 200 FPS. There is no setting at 1080p that drops below 60 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the system also clears 60 FPS at every preset. Ultra averages 68 FPS, which is above the threshold but with less headroom than at 1080p. High averages 91 FPS, Medium 104 FPS, and Low 147 FPS. All settings are playable, though Ultra is the closest to the line.
At 3840x2160, the system only partially delivers. Low averages 95 FPS and Medium averages 67 FPS (with a minimum of 57 FPS), both of which clear the 60 FPS average threshold. High drops to 59 FPS, which is below the playable threshold on average, and Ultra falls to 44 FPS, which is not playable. The verdict for 4K is that only Low and Medium are viable options.
Overall, the Ryzen 7 7700X + RX 7700 is a capable 1080p and 1440p machine for Lockdown Protocol, and it can even handle 4K at reduced settings. The 1709th overall rank reflects this versatility—it is not a specialist at any single resolution, but it offers broad playability.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on 1080p Ultra?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system averages 93 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best setting at 4K that stays above 60 FPS?
A: Medium is the best 4K preset that maintains an average above 60 FPS, posting 67 FPS average with a 57 FPS minimum. High and Ultra fall below the threshold at 59 FPS and 44 FPS respectively.
Q: How does the RX 7700 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti in this game?
A: The RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15,852, while the RTX 3060 Ti scores 16,129, which is 1.7% higher. In Lockdown Protocol, this translates to a negligible difference in frame rates—well within run-to-run variance.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Lockdown Protocol at 1440p?
A: The GPU is the dominant factor at 1440p. Frame rates drop by 29% going from Low to Medium, 13% from Medium to High, and 25% from High to Ultra, indicating that the RX 7700's rendering capacity is the primary constraint.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7700X significantly faster than the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H?
A: No. The 7700X has an average benchmark score of 35,909, while the Core Ultra 9 185H scores 35,670, a difference of only 0.7%. In practice, the two CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in Lockdown Protocol.
Q: What is the lowest playable setting at 4K?
A: Low at 4K averages 95 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most comfortable 4K option, though Medium at 67 FPS is also playable.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which averages 67 FPS (minimum 57 FPS). High falls to 59 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 44 FPS, so Medium is the ceiling for smooth 4K gameplay.
At 2560x1440, the system can run Ultra settings while maintaining an average of 68 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold, though it has less headroom than the lower presets. High averages 91 FPS, Medium 104 FPS, and Low 147 FPS, but Ultra is the recommended maximum for visual quality.
At 1920x1080, Ultra settings are fully playable with an average of 93 FPS. This is the highest preset available and it clears the 60 FPS line by a substantial margin. High averages 124 FPS, Medium 142 FPS, and Low 200 FPS, but Ultra is the optimal choice for maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing playability.
The data shows a clear progression: at 1080p, the system has enough GPU headroom to run the game at maximum settings; at 1440p, it can still run Ultra but with less margin; and at 4K, it must step down to Medium to stay above 60 FPS. This makes the combo best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K viable only at reduced settings.