Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 39 | 51 | 59 | 83 |
| 1440p QHD | 60 | 80 | 91 | 128 |
| 1080p Full HD | 81 | 109 | 124 | 175 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination produces a wide spread of results in Lockdown Protocol, hinging almost entirely on resolution and the chosen graphics preset. At 1920x1080, the pairing is overwhelmingly capable, but pushing to 3840x2160 exposes a sharp drop-off that limits the user to the Low preset for a smooth experience. The data reveals a system that is clearly optimized for high-refresh 1080p gaming and solid 1440p play, while 4K remains a compromise scenario.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates for this configuration show a clear hierarchy across the three resolutions and four presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields an average of 175 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded for this combo. Medium drops to 124 FPS average, with a minimum of 106 FPS and a maximum of 143 FPS. High produces 109 FPS average, and Ultra still manages a strong 81 FPS average. Every 1080p preset clears the 60 FPS playability threshold with substantial headroom.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains robust but the scaling penalty is evident. Low delivers 128 FPS average, while Medium averages 91 FPS with a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 105 FPS. High averages 80 FPS, and Ultra exactly hits the 60 FPS threshold, making it technically playable but with no margin for demanding scenes. The step from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 27% of the average FPS at Low settings, which is a typical rasterization load increase.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Low is the only preset that stays comfortably above 60 FPS, averaging 83 FPS. Medium averages 59 FPS, just one frame below the playability threshold, with a minimum of 50 FPS and a maximum of 68 FPS — indicating noticeable frame-time variance. High averages 51 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS. The 4K results show that the RX 9060’s 8 GB memory buffer and 128-bit bus become limiting factors when pixel count quadruples relative to 1080p.
The frame data also shows that the gap between Low and Ultra widens with resolution. At 1080p, the difference is 94 FPS (175 vs 81). At 1440p, it shrinks to 68 FPS (128 vs 60). At 4K, the gap is 44 FPS (83 vs 39). This suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU can feed the GPU enough frames to expose the full preset scaling, while at 4K the GPU becomes the bottleneck and preset changes have less absolute impact.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset?
A: Yes. The measured average FPS is 81, which is 21 frames above the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is the highest preset available and runs smoothly.
Q: What is the best preset for 2560x1440?
A: Ultra is playable at exactly 60 FPS average, but the data suggests Medium or High offer more comfortable margins — 91 FPS and 80 FPS respectively. If visual fidelity is the priority, Ultra works, but frame drops below 60 are possible in heavy scenes.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware combo?
A: Only with the Low preset, which averages 83 FPS. Medium falls to 59 FPS average with a 50 FPS minimum, which violates the 60 FPS threshold. High and Ultra are not viable at 4K, averaging 51 FPS and 39 FPS respectively.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in raw benchmark scores?
A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129, which is 0.7% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15852, which is 1% lower. These are effectively performance peers.
Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all tested CPUs?
A: The Ryzen 7 7700 ranks in the 87th percentile, meaning it outperforms 87% of all CPUs in the benchmark database. Its average benchmark score is 40081.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at any resolution?
A: The data does not explicitly flag a bottleneck. However, the FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K follows a pattern consistent with GPU limitation at higher resolutions. The CPU’s 87th percentile ranking suggests it is not the limiting factor in most scenarios.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results indicate that Lockdown Protocol scales heavily with GPU load as resolution increases, which is typical for an FPS title. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s role is more prominent — the Ryzen 7 7700’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, are sufficient to drive the RX 9060 to 175 FPS at Low settings. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1049 and multi-thread score of 8479 suggest it can handle the game’s physics and AI workloads without becoming a constraint.
At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take over as the primary performance driver. The average FPS drops by roughly 27% across all presets compared to 1080p, which aligns with the increased pixel count requiring more shader and texture work. The RX 9060’s 1792 shading units and 64 ROPs are being pushed harder, but the system still maintains playable frame rates at all presets. The GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1440p, as evidenced by the 60 FPS average at Ultra.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. The RX 9060’s 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB capacity struggle with the 4K workload, causing the average FPS to drop below 60 at Medium and above. The CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor here, as the FPS drop from 1440p to 4K is consistent with GPU-bound rendering. The data suggests that for 4K play, the GPU must be paired with lower quality settings to compensate for its memory bandwidth and capacity constraints.
The preset scaling pattern reinforces this interpretation. At 1080p, switching from Low to Ultra costs 94 FPS, indicating the GPU has headroom to render more effects. At 4K, the same switch costs only 44 FPS, meaning the GPU is already near its limits and additional graphical features have diminishing returns because the pixel throughput is the limiting factor.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for both components, several combinations would behave similarly to this system. The CPU’s closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, which scores 40048 in average benchmarks — a 0.1% delta from the Ryzen 7 7700’s 40081. The Intel Core 5 221E scores 40144 (0.2% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 9 270 scores 40246 (0.4% higher). These CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, making them direct substitutes if paired with the same GPU.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the closest match, with an average score of 16129 versus the RX 9060’s 16014 — a 0.7% difference. This means a system with the Ryzen 7 7700 and an RTX 3060 Ti would produce essentially identical FPS numbers in Lockdown Protocol. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852, 1% lower) and the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862, 1% lower) are also within 2% of the RX 9060’s performance, so systems using those GPUs would show very similar frame rates, though driver-level differences could affect specific game optimizations.
The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15679, 2.1% lower) is a workstation card that would perform within a few percent, but its driver profile is not gaming-focused. When considering a full system swap, the most predictable alternative would be the Ryzen 7 7700 with an RTX 3060 Ti, as both components sit within 1% of their respective rivals. Users with that combination should expect the same 4K limitations and similar 1080p and 1440p results.
The Verdict
This PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but the definition of "run" depends entirely on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable across all presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra all average above 60 FPS, with Ultra hitting 81 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this hardware, offering smooth gameplay with maximum visual settings. At 2560x1440, the system also clears the 60 FPS bar at every preset, though Ultra sits exactly at 60 FPS average, making it playable but with potential dips in intense firefights. Medium and High are safer choices, providing 91 FPS and 80 FPS respectively.
At 3840x2160, the verdict changes sharply. Only the Low preset is playable, averaging 83 FPS. Medium falls just short at 59 FPS average, and the minimum of 50 FPS confirms it will drop below the playability threshold during gameplay. High and Ultra are not viable, with averages of 51 FPS and 39 FPS. The data is unambiguous: this combo is a 1080p and 1440p machine, with 4K limited to low-fidelity settings. The GPU’s 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus are the primary constraints at 4K, and no amount of CPU power can overcome that hardware limitation.
How This Combo Ranks
Among the 3714 tested hardware combinations in the database, this specific CPU-GPU pairing ranks 2194th. That places it in the 59th percentile of all combos, which is a middling result — better than a majority of systems, but far from the top tier. The ranking reflects the GPU’s 59th percentile standing among all GPUs, which drags down the overall combo despite the CPU’s strong 87th percentile. The CPU is clearly the stronger component in this pairing, but the RX 9060’s mid-range positioning prevents the combo from reaching higher ranks.
This rank suggests that while the system is perfectly capable at 1080p and 1440p, it is not a high-end performer. Many other combinations in the database will outpace it, particularly at 4K. The rank also implies that users with this setup should not expect future games to run at maximum settings at high resolutions, as the GPU will likely be the first component to become obsolete. For Lockdown Protocol specifically, the rank is acceptable, but it indicates the system is closer to the middle of the pack than the top.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above 60 is as follows. At 1920x1080, the best setting is Ultra, which produces an average of 81 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while still offering 21 FPS of headroom above the playability threshold. At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra, but with a tighter margin — the average is exactly 60 FPS. This is playable, but users who prefer consistent frame pacing might choose High (80 FPS) or Medium (91 FPS) for a smoother experience.
At 3840x2160, the best setting is Low, averaging 83 FPS. This is the only preset that clears the 60 FPS bar at 4K. Medium is one frame short at 59 FPS average, which is technically below the threshold, so it cannot be recommended as a stable setting. The data clearly shows that this resolution requires sacrificing visual fidelity to achieve playable frame rates. Users targeting 4K should accept Low settings or consider upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier model with more memory bandwidth.