Lockdown Protocol

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a formidable combination for Lockdown Protocol, an FPS title released in 2024. Measured benchmark data shows this pair delivers exceptionally high frame rates across all tested resolutions, ranking in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs and the 80th percentile among all CPUs. The combination sits at rank 638 out of 3714 tested combos for this specific game, placing it comfortably within the top-performing tier of systems. This analysis breaks down the measured performance data, optimal settings, and how this hardware compares to its nearest competitors.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 638 out of 3714 tested configurations places it in the top 17.2% of all systems tested in Lockdown Protocol. This is a strong showing for a desktop platform built around AMD's Socket AM4 architecture, which is now designated end-of-life, paired with a current-generation Ada Lovelace GPU. The percentile rankings reinforce this positioning: the RTX 4070 SUPER scores in the 83rd percentile against all GPUs, while the Ryzen 7 5800X3D sits in the 80th percentile against all CPUs. These individual component strengths translate directly into gameplay performance, with the data showing no resolution or preset combination falling below 60 FPS.

The rank reflects the balanced nature of this pairing. The CPU's 96 MB of shared L3 cache and 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 architecture provide strong feeding for the GPU's 7168 shading units. In practical terms, this combo outperforms the vast majority of systems, though it trails the very top tier of configurations. The measured average FPS figures show headroom even at 4K Ultra, which indicates that this rank is likely limited more by the GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 192-bit bus than by any CPU bottleneck. For context, the GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, scores only 1% higher in average benchmark score, suggesting the desktop RTX 4070 SUPER is remarkably close to a flagship mobile part in raw compute.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160 (4K UHD), the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 61.5 FPS. This is a critical finding: the system can run the game at maximum settings at 4K, but it is right at the playable threshold with almost no margin. The scaling from High to Ultra at this resolution is significant, dropping from 86 FPS to 61.5 FPS, a 28.5% reduction in frame rate for the visual quality increase.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the best playable setting is also Ultra, producing an average of 99.5 FPS. This provides a comfortable 65.8% buffer above the 60 FPS threshold, making 1440p Ultra a highly viable option for high-refresh-rate monitors. The gap between High (131.2 FPS) and Ultra (99.5 FPS) is noticeable but acceptable for users prioritizing visual fidelity.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system achieves 133.3 FPS on Ultra settings, which is more than double the playable threshold. This makes 1080p Ultra the clear recommendation for competitive play or high-refresh displays, as even the most demanding preset leaves substantial performance headroom. The data shows a consistent pattern: this combo can run Lockdown Protocol at max settings at every resolution, with 4K being the only scenario where the frame rate dips near the 60 FPS line.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals which component dominates at different settings. At 1080p, the difference between Low (253.1 FPS) and Ultra (133.3 FPS) is 119.8 FPS, a 47.3% reduction. This substantial drop when increasing graphical load indicates the GPU is the primary constraint at this resolution, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames at these high rates. The 5800X3D's single-thread score of 884 in 3DMark and 1452 in Cinebench R23 suggests it is not limiting at 1080p.

At 1440p, the scaling from Low (210.8 FPS) to Ultra (99.5 FPS) shows a 52.8% reduction, an even steeper decline than at 1080p. This increasing sensitivity to preset quality confirms the GPU is becoming more stressed as pixel count rises. However, the CPU continues to hold its own; the 5800X3D's multi-thread score of 14,317 in Cinebench R23 and 11,765 in Geekbench multi-core indicate sustained throughput that prevents CPU-bound scenarios.

At 4K, the pattern intensifies. Low settings yield 139.3 FPS, while Ultra drops to 61.5 FPS, a 55.9% reduction. This is the clearest evidence that the RTX 4070 SUPER is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The GPU's 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance are being fully utilized, while the CPU's 16 threads are likely less taxed. The relatively modest 12 GB VRAM capacity could also be a factor at 4K Ultra, though the measured data shows no catastrophic frame drops. Across all resolutions, the GPU is the dominant component, with its influence growing as resolution increases; the CPU provides consistent, stable performance that never becomes a bottleneck in this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U has an average benchmark score of 27,887, which is essentially identical to the 5800X3D's 27,896 (0% delta). This mobile-focused chip with different power characteristics would behave similarly in CPU-bound scenarios, though it lacks the 5800X3D's 3D V-Cache advantage for gaming. The Intel Core i9-10900K scores 27,872 (0.1% delta), offering comparable multi-threaded performance but with a different architecture and higher power consumption. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 27,932 (-0.1% delta), showing that even a newer, more efficient chip provides no meaningful advantage over this older desktop part. The Intel Core i5-12600KF scores 27,799 (0.3% delta), making it a near-identical performer for gaming workloads.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB has an average score of 43,262, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4070 SUPER's 43,223. This professional-grade card offers more VRAM (24 GB vs 12 GB) but lacks modern features like DLSS and ray tracing acceleration. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43,268 (-0.1% delta), meaning this laptop GPU delivers essentially the same performance as the desktop RTX 4070 SUPER in synthetic benchmarks. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (non-24GB variant) scores 43,301 (-0.2% delta), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43,667 (-1% delta), which is surprisingly close despite being a flagship mobile part. These comparisons show that the RTX 4070 SUPER sits in a performance sweet spot, with no rival exceeding it by more than 1% in average benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, but with minimal headroom. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 61.5 FPS, which is just 1.5 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best resolution for high-refresh-rate gaming?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system delivers 133.3 FPS, which is ideal for 144Hz displays. For 1440p, Ultra settings yield 99.5 FPS, suitable for 100Hz+ monitors.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER compare to the RTX 4090 Mobile?

A: The desktop RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43,223, while the RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43,667, a difference of just 1%. In practice, they deliver nearly identical performance.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5800X3D a bottleneck for this GPU?

A: No. The CPU's multi-thread score of 14,317 in Cinebench R23 and 28,309 in Passmark indicates it can keep pace with the GPU across all resolutions. The GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Q: What settings should I use for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra settings are fully playable at 2560x1440, with an average of 99.5 FPS. This provides a 65.8% margin above the 60 FPS threshold, allowing for smooth gameplay with maximum visual quality.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?

A: It ranks 638th out of 3,714 total combinations tested for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the top 17.2% of all configurations.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Lockdown Protocol, and it does so with exceptional performance at every resolution. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: at 3840x2160, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with Ultra averaging 61.5 FPS; at 2560x1440, Ultra settings deliver 99.5 FPS; and at 1920x1080, Ultra settings produce 133.3 FPS. Every resolution and preset combination tested stays above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

The system's weakest configuration is 4K Ultra, where it barely clears the threshold, but this is a minor caveat given the extreme demands of that setup. For most users, 1440p Ultra is the sweet spot, offering near-flawless performance with maximum visual fidelity. At 1080p, the system is overkill for anything less than the highest refresh rates, making it suitable for competitive play. The data confirms this is a high-end combination that ranks in the top 18% of all tested systems, with component scores in the 80th and 83rd percentiles respectively. Users with this hardware can expect a fully playable, high-performance experience across the board, with the only meaningful limitation being the tight 4K Ultra margin.