Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 42 | 52 | 72 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 67 | 74 | 106 |
| 1080p Full HD | 66 | 91 | 105 | 144 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
Can AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 6600 run Lockdown Protocol? The data indicates a capable 1080p and 1440p setup, with the combo ranking in the 2881st position out of 3714 tested configurations. The pairing delivers playable frame rates across most settings at those resolutions, though 4K requires significant compromises. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, component roles, and optimal settings based on the benchmark data.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Lockdown Protocol?
A: The data shows 1920x1080 as the strongest resolution, where the combo achieves 144.1 FPS on Low settings and 66.4 FPS on Ultra. At 2560x1440, performance remains playable with a peak of 105.9 FPS on Low and 67.3 FPS on High.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Lockdown Protocol?
A: Only at Low settings. The measured 3840x2160 results show 71.7 FPS on Low, but Medium drops to 51.6 FPS, High to 41.9 FPS, and Ultra to 33.6 FPS. The 60 FPS threshold is only cleared on Low.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D sits at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 27896 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (27887, 0% delta) and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900K (27872, 0.1% delta). It also edges out the Intel Core i5-12600KF (27799, 0.3% delta).
Q: How does the GPU stack up against similar graphics cards?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 holds the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 19036 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030, 0% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (19049, -0.1% delta). It trails the NVIDIA Tesla K20m (19089, -0.3% delta) by a negligible margin.
Q: What is the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 67.3 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium runs at 74.1 FPS, and Low reaches 105.9 FPS. Ultra falls short at 49.7 FPS.
Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more in this game?
A: The scaling between resolutions suggests the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher settings. The CPU's strong single-thread score (884 in 3dmark_single_thread) and 80th percentile ranking indicate it can feed the GPU adequately, but the RX 6600's 63rd percentile GPU position shows the graphics card is the more likely bottleneck at Ultra settings across all resolutions.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and the Radeon RX 6600 in Lockdown Protocol. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low (144.1 FPS) and Ultra (66.4 FPS) settings spans 77.7 FPS, indicating the GPU workload scales dramatically with visual fidelity. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with its 96 MB of shared L3 cache, provide ample processing headroom — the single-thread score of 884 in 3dmark_single_thread and multi-thread score of 7285 in 3dmark_max_threads suggest the processor is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drop from Low (105.9 FPS) to High (67.3 FPS) is 38.6 FPS, while Ultra falls to 49.7 FPS. This 56.2 FPS gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p, compared to the 77.7 FPS gap at 1080p, shows the GPU's rendering load increasing with resolution. The RX 6600's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes more stressed as pixel count rises, which explains why the GPU percentile ranking of 63 becomes the dominant factor.
At 3840x2160, the pattern intensifies. Low settings produce 71.7 FPS, but Medium drops to 51.6 FPS, High to 41.9 FPS, and Ultra to 33.6 FPS. The 38.1 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is smaller in absolute terms but represents a 53% reduction in frame rate. This indicates that at 4K, the GPU is heavily saturated regardless of preset, while the CPU maintains consistent performance — evidenced by the fact that even the most demanding settings only cause a 38.1 FPS drop compared to the 77.7 FPS drop at 1080p.
The CPU's role becomes more apparent when comparing resolutions at the same preset. At Low settings, 1080p yields 144.1 FPS, 1440p yields 105.9 FPS, and 4K yields 71.7 FPS. This 72.4 FPS spread across resolutions at the same settings points to the GPU being the bottleneck, as the CPU's 16 threads can sustain high frame rates without degradation. Conversely, the GPU's compute capabilities — 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 and 279.0 GTexel/s texture rate — are the limiting factors at higher resolutions and presets.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance. Low settings produce an average of 144.1 FPS, well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium runs at 105.3 FPS, High at 91.3 FPS, and Ultra at 66.4 FPS. All four presets clear the playable threshold, with even the most demanding setting maintaining a 6.4 FPS margin above 60 FPS.
The 2560x1440 results show a noticeable step down. Low settings average 105.9 FPS, which remains comfortably playable. Medium drops to 74.1 FPS, and High to 67.3 FPS — both still above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra falls short at 49.7 FPS, representing a 10.3 FPS deficit that would result in noticeable stutter during intense gameplay.
At 3840x2160, only Low settings achieve playable performance with an average of 71.7 FPS. Medium drops to 51.6 FPS, High to 41.9 FPS, and Ultra to 33.6 FPS. The performance cliff between Low and Medium at 4K (20.1 FPS drop) indicates a significant GPU workload increase that the RX 6600 cannot sustain past the lowest preset.
The scaling efficiency between resolutions is worth noting. At Low settings, 1080p to 1440p represents a 26.5% performance drop (144.1 to 105.9 FPS), while 1440p to 4K represents a 32.3% drop (105.9 to 71.7 FPS). At Ultra settings, the drops are more severe: 1080p to 1440p falls 25.1% (66.4 to 49.7 FPS), and 1440p to 4K falls 32.4% (49.7 to 33.6 FPS). This suggests the GPU's memory bandwidth and pixel throughput become increasingly strained at higher resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and AMD Radeon RX 6600 ranks 2881st out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the lower 22% of configurations. This ranking reflects the GPU's mid-tier position — the RX 6600's 63rd percentile among all GPUs contrasts with the CPU's 80th percentile ranking, indicating the graphics card is the weaker link in this pairing.
The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (27887, 0% delta) and Intel Core i9-10900K (27872, 0.1% delta), all within a narrow performance band. This suggests the 5800X3D's processing power is not the constraint in this game. The GPU's nearest rivals — NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030, 0% delta) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (19049, -0.1% delta) — show similar performance levels, reinforcing that the RX 6600's capabilities define the overall combo's standing.
The rank of 2881 indicates that 833 other combos perform worse, while 2880 perform better. Given that the CPU is in the top 20% of processors and the GPU is in the top 37%, the combo's ranking is dragged down by the GPU. For players considering upgrades, the data suggests focusing on the graphics card first, as the CPU has substantial headroom based on its benchmark scores.
The Verdict
This PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but the experience varies significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low (144.1 FPS), Medium (105.3 FPS), High (91.3 FPS), and Ultra (66.4 FPS) — clear the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the recommended resolution for the full range of visual options.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on Low (105.9 FPS), Medium (74.1 FPS), and High (67.3 FPS), but Ultra falls below the threshold at 49.7 FPS. Players using 1440p displays should stick to High settings or lower for a consistent 60+ FPS experience.
The 3840x2160 resolution is only playable at Low settings (71.7 FPS). Medium (51.6 FPS), High (41.9 FPS), and Ultra (33.6 FPS) all fail to reach 60 FPS, making 4K gaming viable only with significant visual compromises. The verdict data confirms this: the playable settings for 4K are limited to Low, while 1440p supports High, and 1080p supports Ultra.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 66.4 FPS. This provides the best visual quality while still clearing the playable threshold by 6.4 FPS. Players seeking higher frame rates can use Medium (105.3 FPS) or Low (144.1 FPS) for competitive play.
At 2560x1440, High settings are the best choice, delivering 67.3 FPS. This represents the highest quality preset that stays above 60 FPS, with a 7.3 FPS margin. Medium (74.1 FPS) offers additional headroom, while Low (105.9 FPS) is the option for maximum performance.
At 3840x2160, only Low settings achieve playable performance, with an average of 71.7 FPS. This preset provides an 11.7 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold, but players should expect reduced visual fidelity. The next step up, Medium, drops to 51.6 FPS, which would result in noticeable frame pacing issues during fast-paced FPS gameplay.