Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
264 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
180 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
241 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
130 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
179 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
85 FPS
4.5ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 27,578
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 79,842

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 85 112 128 179
1440p QHD 130 173 199 241
1080p Full HD 180 221 235 264

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 221
1920x1080 Low 264
1920x1080 Medium 235
1920x1080 Ultra 180
2560x1440 High 173
2560x1440 Low 241
2560x1440 Medium 199
2560x1440 Ultra 130
3840x2160 High 112
3840x2160 Low 179
3840x2160 Medium 128
3840x2160 Ultra 85

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination delivers exceptional performance in Lockdown Protocol, with measured frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold across every tested resolution and preset. The data indicates a system capable of maxing out the game's visual settings while maintaining high refresh rate performance, though the scaling patterns reveal interesting dynamics between CPU and GPU workload distribution.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 180 FPS average, making it the clear choice for maximum visual fidelity. The gap between presets is substantial: Low runs at 264 FPS, Medium at 234.5 FPS, and High at 220.7 FPS, but Ultra's 180 FPS remains far above any competitive display requirement. There is no reason to sacrifice quality at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, Ultra maintains a strong 129.6 FPS average. This is the most demanding preset that stays comfortably above 60 FPS, and it still provides enough headroom for high refresh rate monitors. The scaling from 1080p shows a 50.4 FPS drop when moving from Ultra at 1920x1080 to Ultra at 2560x1440, which is a moderate penalty given the 78% increase in pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 85.4 FPS, which remains well above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most demanding configuration tested, and it still delivers a smooth experience. High settings at 4K reach 111.7 FPS, Medium hits 127.8 FPS, and Low achieves 178.7 FPS. The data shows that even the heaviest load presented to this combination falls short of stressing the hardware to its limits.

The verdict across all resolutions is consistent: Ultra settings are always viable. The lowest frame rate recorded in the entire dataset is 85.4 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is still 42% above the playability threshold. This suggests the system has significant untapped potential, possibly limited more by game engine constraints than hardware capability.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling patterns between resolutions and presets reveal a system that remains GPU-bound at higher settings but shows CPU influence at lower presets. At 1920x1080 Low, the system produces 264 FPS, which drops to 240.9 FPS at 1440p and 178.7 FPS at 4K. This represents a 32% reduction from 1080p to 4K, indicating that even at Low settings, resolution scaling has a measurable impact.

The CPU's role becomes more apparent when examining preset scaling at each resolution. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces frame rates by 84 FPS (264 to 180), a 32% penalty. At 1440p, the same preset change costs 111.3 FPS (240.9 to 129.6), a 46% reduction. At 4K, the penalty grows to 93.3 FPS (178.7 to 85.4), a 52% reduction. This increasing percentage drop at higher resolutions indicates the GPU becomes progressively more dominant as pixel count rises.

The Ryzen 7 5700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, appears sufficient to feed the RTX 5090 even at 1080p Low where frame rates approach 264 FPS. The fact that 1080p Low produces the highest frame rate in the dataset suggests the CPU can sustain very high instruction throughput. However, the relatively modest 4.60 GHz boost clock and DDR4 memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s may create subtle bottlenecks at extreme frame rates.

At 4K Ultra, the system delivers 85.4 FPS, which is likely close to pure GPU-bound performance. The RTX 5090's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth provide ample resources for high-resolution textures. The GPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all GPUs, compared to the CPU's 79th percentile, reinforces that the graphics card is the stronger component in this pairing.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with maximum settings?

A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 85.4 FPS, which is 42% above the 60 FPS playability threshold. All four settings presets at 4K (Low at 178.7 FPS, Medium at 127.8 FPS, High at 111.7 FPS, Ultra at 85.4 FPS) clear the playability threshold.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with competitive settings?

A: At 1920x1080 Low, the system averages 264 FPS. Medium reaches 234.5 FPS, High achieves 220.7 FPS, and Ultra still delivers 180 FPS. Any preset at 1080p will comfortably support high refresh rate displays up to 240 Hz.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5090's average benchmark score is 79842, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, scores 79605, a 0.3% difference. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT trails by 1.1% with a score of 78940.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700X a bottleneck for the RTX 5090?

A: The data suggests minimal bottlenecking. The CPU scores 27578 on average benchmarks, placing it in the 79th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600K, matches its score exactly with 0% delta. The system still produces 264 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating strong CPU throughput.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between High and Ultra at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, High averages 172.7 FPS while Ultra averages 129.6 FPS. The difference of 43.1 FPS represents a 25% performance cost for enabling Ultra settings, which may be worthwhile given the visual improvements.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at all tested settings?

A: Yes. The lowest recorded average frame rate across the entire dataset is 85.4 FPS at 4K Ultra. Every combination of resolution and settings exceeds the 60 FPS threshold, with the closest margin being 42% above the minimum.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals provide insight into comparable processors. The Intel Core i5-12600K matches the Ryzen 7 5700X exactly with an average score of 27578 and 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, just 0.2% lower, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27636, 0.2% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H rounds out the group at 27507, 0.3% lower. Any of these processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Lockdown Protocol.

On the GPU side, the nearest rivals are more diverse. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79605, just 0.3% below the RTX 5090's 79842. The Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79396, a 0.6% deficit. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78940, 1.1% lower, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80959, actually 1.4% higher than the RTX 5090. These alternatives would produce similar frame rates, though the Tesla and Radeon Pro cards are workstation-oriented products.

The performance deltas are remarkably tight, with all GPU rivals within 1.4% of the RTX 5090's average score. This suggests that in synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 5090's advantage over these alternatives is minimal. However, the RTX 5090's 92nd percentile ranking versus the CPU's 79th percentile indicates the GPU contributes more to overall system performance in this pairing.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination ranks 149th out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the top 4% of all tested configurations, which is notable given the CPU is not a flagship part. The high ranking is primarily driven by the RTX 5090's exceptional performance, as the GPU's 92nd percentile ranking far exceeds the CPU's 79th percentile.

The rank of 149 out of 3714 means there are 148 combinations that perform better in this game. These likely include CPUs with higher single-thread performance or newer platforms with faster memory. The Ryzen 7 5700X's DDR4 memory support and PCIe Gen 4 interface may limit performance in CPU-bound scenarios, but the data shows this does not prevent the system from achieving excellent frame rates.

The gap between the CPU and GPU percentiles (79th vs 92nd) suggests this combo is somewhat imbalanced, with the GPU being the clearly stronger component. In a game like Lockdown Protocol that appears to scale well with GPU power, this imbalance works in the system's favor, producing top-tier results despite the mid-range CPU.

The Verdict

Benchmark results clearly indicate this system can run Lockdown Protocol at all tested resolutions and presets. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset delivers 85.4 FPS, well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra achieves 129.6 FPS, providing excellent headroom for high refresh rate gaming. At 1920x1080, Ultra reaches 180 FPS, which supports even the fastest competitive displays.

The verdict is straightforward: every resolution and settings combination tested clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. The lowest performance point in the entire dataset is 4K Ultra at 85.4 FPS, which still offers a 42% margin above minimum requirements. This system does not merely run Lockdown Protocol; it dominates it.

For users with 4K displays, the system handles maximum settings without compromise. For competitive players at 1080p, the frame rates exceed 250 FPS at Low settings, providing the responsiveness needed for fast-paced FPS gameplay. The only limitation appears to be the game engine itself, as the hardware consistently produces frame rates that suggest additional headroom.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system produces its highest frame rates. Low settings average 264 FPS, representing the peak performance of this combination. Medium settings reach 234.5 FPS, High settings achieve 220.7 FPS, and Ultra settings deliver 180 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 84 FPS, showing a 32% performance cost for maximum visual quality.

At 2560x1440, frame rates remain exceptionally high. Low averages 240.9 FPS, Medium reaches 198.7 FPS, High achieves 172.7 FPS, and Ultra delivers 129.6 FPS. The resolution increase from 1080p reduces performance by 9% at Low, 15% at Medium, 22% at High, and 28% at Ultra, demonstrating how higher settings amplify the resolution penalty.

At 3840x2160, the system shows its most demanding workload. Low averages 178.7 FPS, Medium reaches 127.8 FPS, High achieves 111.7 FPS, and Ultra delivers 85.4 FPS. Moving from 1080p to 4K costs 32% at Low, 45% at Medium, 49% at High, and 53% at Ultra. The increasing percentage losses at higher settings confirm the GPU becomes the dominant performance factor as both resolution and graphical complexity rise.