Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 38 | 48 | 57 | 75 |
| 1440p QHD | 55 | 74 | 83 | 115 |
| 1080p Full HD | 72 | 101 | 114 | 160 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti combination delivers a highly variable experience in Lockdown Protocol, scaling from a demanding 4K slog to a smooth 1080p powerhouse. The data shows a clear pattern: this pairing is entirely resolution-dependent, with the RTX 3060 Ti acting as the primary bottleneck at higher pixel counts while the Ryzen 7 5700X provides ample headroom at lower settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the RTX 3060 Ti struggles to maintain fluid motion across most presets. Ultra settings produce an average of 37.6 FPS, which falls well below the 60 FPS playability threshold. High settings improve the situation to 47.8 FPS, but this remains choppy for fast-paced FPS gameplay. Medium settings edge closer to playability at 57 FPS, yet still miss the mark. The only 4K option that clears 60 FPS is Low, which delivers a respectable 75.2 FPS average. This represents a 2x performance jump from Ultra to Low, indicating that visual fidelity comes at a steep cost at this resolution.
Dropping to 2560x1440 reveals a more capable system. The Low preset hits 114.7 FPS, providing an exceptionally smooth experience. Medium follows at 83.3 FPS, and High manages 73.7 FPS—all comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. Only Ultra falls short at 55.3 FPS, which is frustratingly close to playable but still below the benchmark standard. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1440p shows a 52% performance drop, slightly less severe than at 4K, suggesting the GPU is still the limiting factor but with diminishing returns as resolution decreases.
At 1920x1080, this combo transforms into a high-refresh-rate machine. The Low preset reaches 159.8 FPS, while Medium delivers 113.6 FPS and High achieves 101.1 FPS. Even Ultra, the most demanding preset, maintains 71.6 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS bar with room to spare. The spread from Ultra to Low is 88.2 FPS, demonstrating that even the heaviest settings leave significant performance on the table at 1080p. This resolution is where the Ryzen 7 5700X's 8-core, 16-thread architecture can stretch its legs, as the GPU is no longer the sole bottleneck.
Best Settings per Resolution
The data identifies a single playable setting at 3840x2160: Low, which produces an average of 75.2 FPS. This is the only 4K preset that meets the 60 FPS threshold, and it does so with a comfortable 15.2 FPS margin. Medium at 57 FPS and High at 47.8 FPS are both unplayable by this metric, while Ultra at 37.6 FPS is a non-starter for competitive play.
At 2560x1440, High becomes the optimal choice, delivering 73.7 FPS. This is notably better than the Medium preset's 83.3 FPS in terms of visual quality while still maintaining a 13.7 FPS cushion above the threshold. Low at 114.7 FPS is faster but sacrifices too much visual fidelity for most players. Ultra at 55.3 FPS is the only 1440p setting that fails to reach 60 FPS, making High the clear sweet spot.
For 1920x1080, Ultra is the best setting at 71.6 FPS. This is a remarkable outcome, as the most demanding preset still clears the playability bar by 11.6 FPS. High at 101.1 FPS offers a massive speed advantage for esports-oriented play, but Ultra provides the full visual experience without compromising smoothness. The verdict data confirms this: all four presets are playable at 1080p, with Ultra being the recommended choice for maximum fidelity.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results indicate a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 7 5700X and the RTX 3060 Ti. At 3840x2160, the GPU dominates the performance equation. The transition from Low to Ultra at 4K produces a 50% FPS reduction (75.2 to 37.6), which is a classic sign of pixel-bound rendering. The CPU's 3.40 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost clocks are sufficient to feed the GPU with frames, but the RTX 3060 Ti's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factors.
At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly. The scaling from Low to Ultra (114.7 to 55.3 FPS) shows a 51.8% drop, similar to 4K, but the absolute numbers are higher. This suggests the GPU is still the primary constraint, though the CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps maintain consistent frame delivery. The Ryzen 7 5700X's 16 threads are not fully taxed at this resolution, as evidenced by the relatively smooth scaling between presets.
At 1920x1080, the CPU begins to play a more significant role. The scaling from Low to Ultra (159.8 to 71.6 FPS) shows a 55.2% drop, which is actually steeper than at higher resolutions. This counterintuitive result indicates that at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 921) starts to matter more, as the GPU has spare capacity. The Ryzen 7 5700X's 8 cores handle the game's physics and AI workloads, while the RTX 3060 Ti's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides ample rasterization power. The net effect is that neither component is fully saturated at 1080p Low, but Ultra settings push both closer to their limits.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Intel Core i5-12600K matches the Ryzen 7 5700X exactly with an average score of 27578 and a 0% deltaPct. This means users with either processor would see nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is just 0.2% behind at 27535, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is 0.2% ahead at 27636. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H rounds out the group at 0.3% ahead with 27507. These deltas are negligible in real-world gaming, so any of these CPUs paired with an RTX 3060 Ti would produce statistically identical results in this title.
On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is the closest competitor at 0.7% ahead of the RTX 3060 Ti, scoring 16014 versus 16129. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT are both 1.4% behind, with scores of 16351 and 16361 respectively. The AMD Radeon R9 370X is 1.7% behind at 15862. These differences are small enough that a user swapping between these GPUs would see frame rate variations of only a few percent—perceptible in benchmarks but not transformative in actual gameplay. For Lockdown Protocol specifically, any of these GPUs would deliver similar tiering across resolutions, with the RX 9060 offering a marginal edge at 4K.
The Verdict
This PC can absolutely run Lockdown Protocol, but the experience depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on every preset, with Ultra hitting 71.6 FPS. This is the ideal scenario for this combo: full visual fidelity with smooth gameplay. At 2560x1440, High settings at 73.7 FPS are the best choice, though Medium at 83.3 FPS is also viable. Ultra at 55.3 FPS is just below the threshold, making it a poor trade-off for the visual gains.
At 3840x2160, the system is only playable on Low settings at 75.2 FPS. Medium at 57 FPS and High at 47.8 FPS are both below the 60 FPS bar, and Ultra at 37.6 FPS is unsuitable for competitive play. The verdict data confirms this: 4K only supports Low, 1440p supports Low, Medium, and High, and 1080p supports all four presets. For a 60 FPS target, the RTX 3060 Ti's 8 GB VRAM and 256-bit memory bus are adequate for 1080p and 1440p but insufficient for 4K beyond minimal settings.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader context of tested hardware combinations, this pairing ranks 2533 out of 3714 combos for Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all tested systems, which is consistent with the RTX 3060 Ti's 59th percentile among all GPUs and the Ryzen 7 5700X's 79th percentile among all CPUs. The CPU is clearly the stronger component in this pairing, ranking significantly higher than the GPU, which explains why the system performs better at lower resolutions where the CPU's relative strength can compensate for the GPU's limitations.
The rank of 2533 out of 3714 means that roughly 32% of tested combos perform worse, while 68% perform better. This is not a top-tier gaming rig, but it is far from the bottom. For a 1080p gamer, this rank undersells the actual experience, as the system delivers 100+ FPS on most presets. For a 4K enthusiast, the rank is more accurate, as the system struggles to maintain playability. The data suggests this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it outperforms its overall ranking would suggest.