Lockdown Protocol

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT demonstrates strong performance in Lockdown Protocol, with measured frame rates indicating that the combination is capable of exceeding the 60 FPS threshold at all tested resolutions, provided the correct settings are selected. The data shows a clear scaling pattern where lower resolutions allow for higher graphical presets while maintaining smooth gameplay.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, which delivers an average of 76 FPS. The Ultra preset drops below the playable threshold at this resolution, averaging 57 FPS, while Medium and Low settings provide higher headroom at 87 FPS and 123 FPS respectively.

For 2560x1440, the highest preset that clears the 60 FPS bar is Ultra, achieving an average of 89 FPS. This represents a significant upgrade in visual fidelity over the 4K result, with all four tested presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—remaining comfortably above the playable threshold.

At 1920x1080, the system can run the game at Ultra settings with an average of 121 FPS. This is the best-case scenario for visual quality, and the frame rate remains more than double the 60 FPS playability threshold. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is substantial, from 259 FPS down to 121 FPS, but both ends of the spectrum provide an excellent experience.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, at 4K the system can run the game on High settings with an average of 76 FPS. Medium settings yield 87 FPS, and Low settings reach 123 FPS. Ultra settings fall short of the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 57 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The Ultra preset is fully playable at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 89 FPS. This allows for maximum visual quality without compromising smoothness, as the frame rate stays well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: How does the system perform at 1080p with maximum settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 121 FPS. This is more than double the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that the CPU and GPU combination has significant headroom for high-refresh-rate displays.

Q: Is there a resolution where the system fails to reach 60 FPS?

A: The only configuration that falls below 60 FPS is 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which averages 57 FPS. All other tested combinations of resolution and settings exceed the 60 FPS mark.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum frame rates at Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 Medium, the frame rate ranges from 157 FPS minimum to 212 FPS maximum, with an average of 185 FPS. At 2560x1440 Medium, the range is 115 FPS to 156 FPS, averaging 135 FPS. At 3840x2160 Medium, the range is 74 FPS to 100 FPS, averaging 87 FPS.

Q: How much performance is gained by lowering settings from Ultra to Low?

A: The performance gain from Ultra to Low varies by resolution. At 4K, the average frame rate increases from 57 FPS to 123 FPS, a gain of 66 FPS. At 1440p, it goes from 89 FPS to 191 FPS, a gain of 102 FPS. At 1080p, it goes from 121 FPS to 259 FPS, a gain of 138 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a comprehensive view of performance across a matrix of three resolutions and four settings levels.

At 3840x2160, the system delivers an average of 76 FPS on High settings, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. Low settings produce 123 FPS on average. Medium settings show a more complete picture with an average of 87 FPS, a minimum of 74 FPS, and a maximum of 100 FPS. Ultra settings drop to an average of 57 FPS, which is the only sub-60 result in the entire dataset.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance improves substantially across all settings. High settings average 118 FPS. Low settings reach 191 FPS. Medium settings show an average of 135 FPS, with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS. Ultra settings achieve 89 FPS on average, making this the first resolution where the highest preset is playable.

At 1920x1080, the system shows its strongest results. High settings average 161 FPS. Low settings peak at 259 FPS. Medium settings demonstrate an average of 185 FPS, with a minimum of 157 FPS and a maximum of 212 FPS. Ultra settings deliver 121 FPS, confirming that even the most demanding preset at 1080p provides a high-refresh-rate experience.

The data reveals that the gap between Medium and High settings is relatively small compared to the gap between High and Ultra. For example, at 1440p, the difference between Medium and High is 17 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra is 29 FPS. This suggests diminishing returns at the highest preset level.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this CPU-GPU pairing ranks 920 out of 3714 total combinations. This places it in the top quarter of all tested systems, indicating that it is a strong performer for this specific game.

The rank reflects the system's ability to maintain high frame rates across multiple resolutions. The 4K High result of 76 FPS and the 1440p Ultra result of 89 FPS are particularly notable, as they demonstrate that the combination can handle demanding scenarios without requiring significant settings compromises.

The percentile positioning suggests that while there are faster combinations available, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT provide a balanced experience that will satisfy most players looking for high-refresh-rate gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, as well as solid 4K performance on High settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores include the Intel Xeon D-2752TER with a score of 25530 and a delta of -0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U with a score of 25485 and a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H with a score of 25550 and a delta of -0.1%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U with a score of 25446 and a delta of 0.3%. These processors would be expected to deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Lockdown Protocol, though the actual frame rates may vary depending on GPU pairing.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7770M with an average score of 13536 and a delta of 0.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 with a score of 13515 and a delta of 0.2%, the NVIDIA P106-090 with a score of 13470 and a delta of 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 555 with a score of 13407 and a delta of 1%. These graphics cards would offer similar raw compute performance, though the RX 9070 XT has architectural advantages that may not be fully captured by the average score metric.

It is important to note that the rival scores are based on general benchmarks, not specifically on Lockdown Protocol. The measured frame rates for this specific game combination may differ from what these alternatives would achieve, depending on driver optimization and game-specific workloads.

The Verdict

This system can definitively run Lockdown Protocol at playable frame rates across all tested resolutions. At 3840x2160, the playable settings include High, Low, and Medium, with the best playable setting being High at 76 FPS average. The Ultra preset is not playable at this resolution, averaging 57 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, all four settings are playable, with Ultra being the best option at 89 FPS average. This makes 1440p the sweet spot for this combination, as it allows for maximum visual quality while maintaining a frame rate that is nearly 50% above the playability threshold.

At 1920x1080, every preset is playable, with Ultra delivering 121 FPS average. The system has enough performance headroom to support high-refresh-rate monitors, as even the most demanding settings at 1080p produce frame rates well above 100 FPS.

The overall verdict is that this PC is highly capable for Lockdown Protocol. Players with 1080p or 1440p displays can use the highest settings without concern, while 4K users will need to settle for High settings to ensure smooth gameplay.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the CPU and GPU each contribute to the gaming experience. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high, reaching 259 FPS on Low settings. This indicates that the GPU is not heavily taxed at this resolution, and the CPU's capabilities are sufficient to feed the graphics card efficiently. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p reduces the average frame rate by 138 FPS, from 259 FPS to 121 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU becomes more involved as graphical load increases.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to play a more significant role. The Ultra preset average drops to 89 FPS, compared to 121 FPS at 1080p, showing a 32 FPS decrease from the resolution increase alone. This indicates that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor at this resolution, though the CPU still provides adequate support for the higher frame rates seen at lower settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant component. The Ultra preset falls to 57 FPS, and even the High preset, which is the recommended playable setting, averages 76 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 66 FPS, which is smaller than the 138 FPS difference at 1080p. This compression of frame rates at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is saturated, and the CPU has less impact on overall performance.

The data suggests that for this game, the CPU matters most at lower resolutions where frame rates are higher, while the GPU becomes the primary constraint at 4K. The scaling pattern from 1080p to 1440p shows a moderate GPU impact, while the jump from 1440p to 4K produces a more pronounced drop in performance, particularly at higher settings. Players targeting 1440p Ultra should focus on GPU capabilities, while those aiming for maximum frame rates at 1080p will benefit from a balanced system with strong CPU performance.