Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

62%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
167 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
75 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
121 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
56 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
80 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
36 FPS
9.9ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 25,517
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 17,083

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 36 49 58 80
1440p QHD 56 76 86 121
1080p Full HD 75 101 118 167

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 101
1920x1080 Low 167
1920x1080 Medium 118
1920x1080 Ultra 75
2560x1440 High 76
2560x1440 Low 121
2560x1440 Medium 86
2560x1440 Ultra 56
3840x2160 High 49
3840x2160 Low 80
3840x2160 Medium 58
3840x2160 Ultra 36

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT combination delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Lockdown Protocol, but 4K requires substantial settings compromises. The data shows a clear performance ceiling at higher resolutions, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck as pixel count rises. This pairing handles the game well at mainstream resolutions, though the gap between Low and Ultra presets widens dramatically at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its strongest results. The Low preset averages 167.1 FPS, which is more than double the 75 FPS achieved on Ultra. High settings yield 101 FPS, while Medium lands at 117.5 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 55.1% drop in average frame rate, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor even at this resolution. The step from Medium to High costs 16.5 FPS, while moving from High to Ultra costs another 26 FPS, making Ultra the most expensive tier relative to its visual gain.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages shift downward but remain playable across most presets. Low produces 120.5 FPS, Medium delivers 86.2 FPS, and High holds at 76.3 FPS. Ultra drops to 56.3 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The delta between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 64.2 FPS, a 53.3% reduction. The transition from Medium to High costs 9.9 FPS, while High to Ultra costs 20 FPS, showing that the final preset tier is disproportionately heavy.

At 3840x2160, performance degrades significantly. Low averages 80.3 FPS, Medium drops to 57.8 FPS, High falls to 48.9 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 35.7 FPS. Only the Low preset stays above the 60 FPS threshold. The spread between Low and Ultra is a massive 44.6 FPS, representing a 55.6% performance loss. Even Medium, which is only one step above Low, loses 22.5 FPS compared to the minimum preset. The data suggests that 4K gaming with this combo requires accepting the lowest visual quality or using external upscaling methods.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that remains playable, averaging 75 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold, leaving headroom for demanding scenes. High at 101 FPS and Medium at 117.5 FPS are also viable, but Ultra provides the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

For 2560x1440, High is the optimal choice, delivering 76.3 FPS. This preset offers a good balance between visual fidelity and performance. Medium at 86.2 FPS and Low at 120.5 FPS are also above the threshold, but Ultra's 56.3 FPS disqualifies it. The data indicates that High is the ceiling for 1440p with this hardware.

At 3840x2160, only Low achieves playability with an 80.3 FPS average. Medium at 57.8 FPS and High at 48.9 FPS both fall short of the 60 FPS target. Ultra is not viable at 35.7 FPS. The recommendation is clear: use Low settings at 4K or consider reducing the resolution to 1440p for higher quality presets.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores show that the Ryzen 7 5700 is closely matched with several other processors. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER scores 25530, a mere 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485, also within 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H trails at 25550, a 0.1% deficit, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25446, a 0.3% gap. These processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, as the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at most settings.

For the GPU, the RX 7600 XT sits between several comparable options. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037, just 0.3% behind. The AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019, a 0.4% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 scores 17208, which is 0.7% ahead. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16932, trailing by 0.9%. These GPUs would deliver similar average FPS in this game, though architectural differences may affect specific scenes. The RTX 3070 is the closest competitor in terms of overall performance, with the GTX 690 being the nearest match on the lower side.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but only on the Low preset, which averages 80.3 FPS. Medium drops to 57.8 FPS, High to 48.9 FPS, and Ultra to 35.7 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best quality preset at 1440p?

A: High settings provide 76.3 FPS, which is the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS. Ultra falls to 56.3 FPS, making it unplayable by the defined threshold.

Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to the RTX 3070 in this game?

A: The RTX 3070 has a benchmark score of 17208, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 7600 XT's score. This translates to a negligible difference in actual frame rates, likely under 1 FPS in most scenarios.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Lockdown Protocol at 1080p?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor at 1080p. The frame rate drops by 55.1% from Low to Ultra, while the CPU's benchmark scores remain constant. The Ryzen 7 5700's single-thread score of 901 and multi-thread score of 6617 are sufficient for this workload.

Q: What frame rate can I expect on Medium settings at 1440p?

A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 86.2 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold and leaves room for frame rate dips in busy scenes.

Q: Does the combo rank well among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 2428 out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it in the 34.6th percentile. This means roughly 65% of tested combos perform better, but this ranking includes higher-end hardware.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals that the GPU dominates performance in Lockdown Protocol. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 92.1 FPS, which is almost entirely attributable to GPU load. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads with a 3.70 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost clock provide sufficient processing power, as evidenced by the consistent frame rates across presets. The Ryzen 7 5700's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655 and single-core score of 2916 indicate strong computational capability that does not bottleneck the GPU.

At 1440p, the GPU stress increases, but the CPU still keeps up. The drop from Low to Ultra is 64.2 FPS, which is 30.3% less than the 1080p delta. This suggests that the GPU is becoming more saturated, but the CPU is not yet the limiting factor. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6628 and 2-thread score of 1762 show that the CPU can handle both multi-threaded and lightly-threaded workloads without issue.

At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. The frame rate drops to 35.7 FPS on Ultra, while the CPU remains underutilized. The 44.6 FPS difference between Low and Ultra is the smallest absolute delta across resolutions, indicating that the GPU is hitting its compute limits rather than being constrained by CPU throughput. The RX 7600 XT's 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are insufficient for high-fidelity 4K rendering in this game. The CPU's role diminishes further at this resolution, as the GPU's pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s become the determining factors.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks 2428 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all configurations, with approximately 65.4% of tested combos performing better. The CPU's percentile rank of 78 among all CPUs is strong, but the GPU's percentile rank of 60 among all GPUs drags the overall combo down.

The ranking reflects the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions. While the CPU is capable of supporting higher-end graphics cards, the RX 7600 XT caps the system's potential. The GPU's nearest rival, the RTX 3070, scores 0.7% higher, which would likely push the combo a few positions up the ranking. The gap between this combo and top-tier configurations is substantial, but the 1080p and 1440p results show that it is still a viable choice for mainstream gaming. The 4K performance, however, is below average, and users targeting that resolution should consider a more powerful GPU. The combo's rank of 2428 out of 3714 is a fair representation of its overall capability: solid for 1080p and 1440p, but not competitive at 4K.