Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

67%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
164 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
79 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
125 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
55 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
77 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
37 FPS
9.9ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 25,517
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 19,765

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 37 48 59 77
1440p QHD 55 76 85 125
1080p Full HD 79 101 120 164

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 101
1920x1080 Low 164
1920x1080 Medium 120
1920x1080 Ultra 79
2560x1440 High 76
2560x1440 Low 125
2560x1440 Medium 85
2560x1440 Ultra 55
3840x2160 High 48
3840x2160 Low 77
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 Ultra 37

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT combination delivers a versatile 1080p and 1440p gaming experience in Lockdown Protocol, with the data showing a clear path to high refresh rates at Full HD and solid performance at QHD. The measured results indicate this pairing is best suited for 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 gaming, while 4K remains a stretch that only becomes playable at the lowest settings. The Ryzen 7 5700, an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 processor, provides ample CPU headroom, while the RX 6650 XT’s RDNA 2 architecture handles the graphical load efficiently across most settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for this PC in Lockdown Protocol?

A: The data shows the best experience is at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, achieving an average of 79 FPS. For 2560x1440, High settings yield the best playable average at 76.2 FPS, while at 3840x2160, only Low settings clear the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 76.7 FPS.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: Yes, benchmark results indicate that at 2560x1440, High, Low, and Medium settings all exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset delivers an average of 76.2 FPS, Medium achieves 85.2 FPS, and Low reaches 124.9 FPS, making 1440p a viable option for this combination.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the GPU becomes the primary performance driver, as shown by the significant FPS scaling across presets. The CPU’s 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides a strong foundation, but frame rates vary from 163.5 FPS at Low to 79 FPS at Ultra, indicating the RX 6650 XT’s workload is the main variable in performance.

Q: How does this system’s overall benchmark score compare to other tested combos?

A: The combination ranks 2423 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all systems tested. This rank reflects a balanced configuration that outperforms a majority of alternatives but is not at the top of the performance hierarchy.

Q: What are the CPU’s nearest performance rivals based on average benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700’s average score of 25517 is most closely matched by the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, which scores 25446 and is 0.3% slower, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U, which scores 25485 and is 0.1% faster. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER and AMD Ryzen 5 6600H are also within 0.1% of its performance.

Q: What GPU alternatives offer similar performance to the RX 6650 XT?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT’s average benchmark score of 19765 is closely aligned with the NVIDIA Tesla K40m, which is 0.6% faster, and the AMD FirePro W7000, which is 0.7% slower. The AMD FirePro D300 and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 also fall within a 0.8% performance delta.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance data for Lockdown Protocol reveals a clear shift in component importance depending on the resolution and preset level. At 1920x1080, the GPU dominates the performance landscape, with the average FPS scaling dramatically from 163.5 at Low settings down to 79 at Ultra. This 84.5 FPS spread across presets demonstrates that the RX 6650 XT’s shading units and texture units are the primary determinants of frame rate at this resolution, while the Ryzen 7 5700’s 16 threads provide enough processing headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck.

Moving to 2560x1440, the balance begins to shift slightly, though the GPU still holds the reins. The average FPS ranges from 124.9 at Low to 54.5 at Ultra, a 70.4 FPS difference that highlights how the increased pixel count amplifies the graphics card’s workload. The CPU’s role remains secondary, as even the lowest preset produces frame rates well above the playable threshold, indicating that the processor can feed the GPU efficiently at this resolution without limiting output.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s dominance becomes absolute, and the CPU’s influence on frame rate diminishes to near irrelevance. The average FPS across all settings is significantly lower than at other resolutions, with Ultra dipping to 36.6 FPS and High barely reaching 47.8 FPS. Only Low settings achieve a playable 76.7 FPS. This pattern shows that at 4K, the RX 6650 XT’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus width are the critical factors, as the sheer number of pixels overwhelms the GPU regardless of CPU capability.

The preset scaling across all resolutions follows a predictable pattern: Low settings always produce the highest frame rates, followed by Medium, then High, with Ultra consistently delivering the lowest averages. This consistent hierarchy confirms that the GPU’s compute resources are the limiting factor, as each increase in visual fidelity directly translates to a measurable FPS cost. The Ryzen 7 5700’s 65 W TDP and balanced architecture ensure it never becomes the primary constraint, allowing the RX 6650 XT to dictate overall performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest performance across all settings. The Low preset produces an average of 163.5 FPS, which is the highest measured result for this combination. Medium settings follow with 119.7 FPS, High achieves 101.3 FPS, and Ultra rounds out the options with 79 FPS. All four presets comfortably exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold, making 1080p the most flexible resolution for this hardware, with ample headroom for high refresh rate displays at lower settings and smooth gameplay even at maximum visual quality.

The 2560x1440 results show a notable step down in performance but remain largely playable. Low settings average 124.9 FPS, providing an excellent experience for competitive play. Medium delivers 85.2 FPS, which is still well above the playable threshold. High settings achieve 76.2 FPS, maintaining smooth gameplay with improved visuals. Ultra is the only preset that falls below 60 FPS, with an average of 54.5 FPS, making it unsuitable for consistent 60 FPS gaming at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly, and the playable options become limited. Low settings are the only preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 76.7 FPS. Medium falls to 58.6 FPS, which is just below the playable mark and may result in occasional stutter during intense scenes. High settings manage 47.8 FPS, while Ultra drops to 36.6 FPS, both of which are too low for a smooth experience. The 4K results clearly indicate that this combination is not suited for high-fidelity gaming at this resolution.

The absence of min and max FPS data in the measurements means the analysis relies solely on average performance. The average FPS values across all resolutions and presets show a consistent trend: the system performs best at Low settings and degrades predictably as visual quality increases. The gap between Low and Ultra is most pronounced at 1080p, where the difference is 84.5 FPS, and narrows to 40.1 FPS at 4K, reflecting the GPU’s diminishing ability to handle the increased pixel workload at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT holds a rank of 2423 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places the system in the 65th percentile of all configurations tested, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the alternatives in the database. The rank reflects a balanced mid-range setup that delivers consistent, playable performance at mainstream resolutions without reaching the heights of top-tier hardware.

The CPU’s individual standing supports this overall ranking. The Ryzen 7 5700’s average benchmark score of 25517 places it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs tested, indicating that the processor is a strong component relative to the broader market. This high CPU percentile helps offset the GPU’s comparatively lower standing, as the RX 6650 XT sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 19765.

The delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles suggests that the processor has more headroom than the graphics card in this pairing. In Lockdown Protocol, where the GPU is the primary performance driver, this means the system’s overall rank is largely constrained by the RX 6650 XT’s capabilities rather than the Ryzen 7 5700’s processing power. Upgrading the GPU would likely yield more significant performance gains than upgrading the CPU, based on the component-level data.

The rank of 2423 out of 3714 places this combination firmly in the middle-upper tier of tested systems. It is not among the elite configurations that dominate the top rankings, but it also avoids the lower quartile where performance drops below playable thresholds at common resolutions. This positioning makes the combo a reliable choice for gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p, as the measured FPS data confirms it can handle these resolutions effectively.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 provide a clear picture of comparable CPU performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and AMD Ryzen 5 6600H are the closest matches, with the 7640U scoring 25485 (0.1% faster) and the 6600H scoring 25550 (0.1% slower). The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U is slightly further behind at 25446, representing a 0.3% slower performance. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER rounds out the group with a score of 25530, just 0.1% behind the Ryzen 7 5700. These alternatives would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Lockdown Protocol, ensuring that the processor is not a differentiating factor when choosing between them.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT’s closest rivals are a mix of professional and workstation cards. The NVIDIA Tesla K40m scores 19885, which is 0.6% faster than the RX 6650 XT, while the AMD FirePro W7000 scores 19905, a 0.7% advantage. On the slower side, the AMD FirePro D300 scores 19637, just 0.7% behind, and the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 scores 19602, a 0.8% deficit. These cards would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, though their different driver optimizations and feature sets may affect real-world gaming behavior, particularly regarding DirectX 12 Ultimate support, which the RX 6650 XT provides.

In practical terms, a system built with any of these CPU alternatives paired with the RX 6650 XT would produce very similar results in Lockdown Protocol, as the FPS differences would be within the margin of measurement error. Likewise, swapping the RX 6650 XT for one of the rival GPUs while keeping the Ryzen 7 5700 would result in comparable performance, with the Tesla K40m and FirePro W7000 offering a marginal edge and the FirePro D300 and Quadro K5200 trailing slightly. The overall gaming experience at 1080p and 1440p would be effectively indistinguishable between these configurations.

The combination of the Ryzen 7 5700 and RX 6650 XT represents a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically outperforms or bottlenecks the other. The CPU’s 78th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 65th percentile ranking indicate a reasonable balance, with the processor providing enough power to avoid limiting the graphics card in most scenarios. The nearest rivals reinforce this balance, as they all fall within a narrow performance band that would yield similar gameplay experiences.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol effectively at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 resolutions, with the data showing clear playability across most settings. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at all four presets, with Ultra settings achieving a playable average of 79 FPS. This makes 1080p the most versatile resolution for this combination, allowing users to choose between maximum visual quality or high frame rates depending on their preference.

At 2560x1440, the verdict remains positive, though with some caveats. High, Medium, and Low settings all deliver averages above 60 FPS, with High providing the best balance of visuals and performance at 76.2 FPS. Medium achieves a comfortable 85.2 FPS, and Low reaches an excellent 124.9 FPS for competitive play. However, Ultra settings fall short at 54.5 FPS, so users seeking maximum fidelity at 1440p will need to accept a frame rate below the playable threshold.

The 3840x2160 results are more limited. The data shows that only Low settings achieve a playable average of 76.7 FPS, while Medium (58.6 FPS), High (47.8 FPS), and Ultra (36.6 FPS) all fail to reach the 60 FPS target. This means 4K gaming is only viable with significant visual compromises, and even then, the experience may be inconsistent during demanding scenes. The RX 6650 XT’s 8 GB of memory and 128-bit bus width are the primary constraints at this resolution.

The overall verdict is that this system is a strong choice for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Lockdown Protocol, offering smooth frame rates at high quality settings. The CPU’s 8-core, 16-thread configuration ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU at these resolutions. For users prioritizing high refresh rates, the Low preset at 1440p delivers nearly 125 FPS, while those seeking visual fidelity can enjoy Ultra at 1080p with nearly 80 FPS. This combination represents a practical, balanced setup for mainstream gaming, with the understanding that 4K is only marginally playable at the lowest settings.