Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 37 | 49 | 56 | 79 |
| 1440p QHD | 57 | 76 | 87 | 123 |
| 1080p Full HD | 78 | 104 | 119 | 168 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination delivers a solid, if not spectacular, performance profile in Lockdown Protocol. The data reveals a system that excels at 1080p, remains capable at 1440p, but struggles to maintain fluid frame rates at 4K with higher visual presets. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, component roles, and how this pairing ranks against other tested configurations.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the combo is exceptionally strong. With Ultra settings, the average frame rate hits 78 FPS, comfortably clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold. Dropping to High yields a substantial boost to 104 FPS. The Medium preset averages 119 FPS, with a minimum of 101 FPS and a maximum of 137 FPS, indicating very consistent frame pacing. The Low preset pushes performance to an impressive 168 FPS average, showcasing the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU at lower graphical loads.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales down predictably but remains playable. The High preset averages 76 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset delivers 87 FPS on average, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. The Low preset achieves a robust 123 FPS. However, the Ultra preset falls to an average of 57 FPS, just under the playable mark, indicating that the most demanding settings require a resolution drop or component upgrade.
At 3840x2160, the system’s limitations become apparent. The High preset averages only 49 FPS, which is not playable. The Medium preset averages 56 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS, putting it below the playable threshold. The Ultra preset drops further to 37 FPS. The only playable option at 4K is the Low preset, which averages 79 FPS. This stark contrast between settings highlights the GPU's memory bandwidth and shading capabilities as the primary bottlenecks at this resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data indicates a classic resolution-dependent shift in workload. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread performance (as indicated by its Cinebench R23 scores of 2183.5 single-core and 17528.5 multi-core) becomes more influential. The massive jump from 104 FPS at High to 168 FPS at Low suggests that the CPU is capable of delivering far more frames than the GPU can render at higher settings. The GPU is the limiting factor even at 1080p when the visual load increases.
At 2560x1440, the balance begins to tip. The scaling from 123 FPS at Low to 76 FPS at High demonstrates that the GPU is now doing more heavy lifting. The CPU still provides enough headroom to maintain high frame rates at lower presets, but the GPU's performance dictates the ceiling at higher settings. The gap between High (76 FPS) and Medium (87 FPS) is smaller than at 1080p, showing that the GPU is approaching its limits.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the dominant factor. The frame rates across all settings are significantly lower, and the difference between Low (79 FPS) and Ultra (37 FPS) is a dramatic 42 FPS drop. This scaling is primarily due to the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM capacity and 128-bit memory bus, which create a bottleneck when processing the high pixel count and texture loads of 4K resolution. The CPU, while powerful, is largely idle waiting for the GPU to finish its work.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?*
A: Yes, but only with the Low preset, which averages 79 FPS. The Medium (56 FPS), High (49 FPS), and Ultra (37 FPS) presets all fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold at this resolution.
Q: What is the best visual setting for a smooth 60 FPS experience at 1440p?
A: The High preset is the best choice, averaging 76 FPS. While the Medium preset is faster at 87 FPS, High offers superior visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset does not meet the threshold, averaging 57 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for high frame rates at 1080p?
A: The CPU's strong performance is critical for achieving the highest frame rates. The jump from 104 FPS at High to 168 FPS at Low shows the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower graphical settings. However, the GPU becomes the limiting factor when you increase the visual preset to Ultra and above.
Q: How does the RTX 5050's memory configuration impact 4K performance?
A: The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus width are insufficient for maintaining high frame rates at 4K with demanding presets. The severe drop in performance from 79 FPS at Low to 37 FPS at Ultra suggests the memory subsystem is a primary bottleneck at this resolution.
Q: What is the average FPS difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?
A: The difference is significant, with the Low preset averaging 168 FPS and the Ultra preset averaging 78 FPS. This represents a 90 FPS gap, demonstrating the substantial impact of graphical settings on this combination.
Q: Are there any settings at 1440p that provide a frame rate buffer above the playable threshold?
A: Yes, the Low, Medium, and High presets all average above 60 FPS. The Medium preset provides a comfortable buffer with an average of 87 FPS and a minimum of 74 FPS, ensuring that frame dips do not cross below the playable line.
How This Combo Ranks
Out of 3,714 tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks at 2293. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which is a direct consequence of the GPU's performance ceiling. The CPU is highly capable, sitting in the 81st percentile against all CPUs, but the GPU only reaches the 66th percentile against all GPUs. This imbalance means the system's overall gaming performance is dragged down by the graphics card, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU is the primary workload handler. The rank suggests that while this is a competent 1080p machine, it is not a top-tier performer for more demanding scenarios.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE has an average benchmark score of 29656, which is just 0.2% higher than the 9600X's average of 29713. This means performance in CPU-bound scenarios would be nearly identical. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H and AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT are within 0.5% and 0.6% of the 9600X's score, respectively. These processors would deliver very similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol when the game is not GPU-limited.
On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL has an average score of 21153, which is 0.6% lower than the RTX 5050's average of 21035. This indicates that the RX Vega M GL would perform almost identically in most gaming scenarios. The AMD Radeon HD 8970M is 1.0% lower in score, also a very close match. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT is 1.6% higher in score, meaning it might offer a slight edge in frame rates. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.6% higher as well, providing a marginal performance uplift. For a user considering a swap, these components would produce a very similar experience in this game.
The Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 can run Lockdown Protocol, but the experience varies significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, clearing the 60 FPS threshold on all presets, with the Ultra preset averaging 78 FPS. This is the ideal resolution for this combo, offering a high-refresh-rate experience. At 2560x1440, the system is playable on High, Medium, and Low presets, with the High preset providing the best balance at 76 FPS. The Ultra preset is not recommended, as it falls to 57 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the system is only playable on the Low preset, which averages 79 FPS. All other presets fail to meet the 60 FPS playable threshold. Therefore, the verdict is clear: this PC is an excellent choice for 1080p gaming, a good choice for 1440p gaming with adjusted settings, and a poor choice for 4K gaming with high visual fidelity. To achieve a consistent 60+ FPS experience, users should target 1080p or 1440p with High settings or below.