Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

65%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
145 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
66 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
107 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
49 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
71 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
30 FPS
11.1ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 29,713
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 15,290

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 30 44 51 71
1440p QHD 49 66 77 107
1080p Full HD 66 90 104 145

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 90
1920x1080 Low 145
1920x1080 Medium 104
1920x1080 Ultra 66
2560x1440 High 66
2560x1440 Low 107
2560x1440 Medium 77
2560x1440 Ultra 49
3840x2160 High 44
3840x2160 Low 71
3840x2160 Medium 51
3840x2160 Ultra 30

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 deliver a workable but sharply tiered experience in Lockdown Protocol, with playability hinging entirely on resolution and preset selection. The data shows a combination that can hit smooth frame rates at 1080p and 1440p with the right settings, but falls below the 60 FPS threshold at 4K unless dialed down to the lowest preset. The recorded measurements reveal a clear pattern: this pairing is best treated as a 1080p-centric setup with headroom for 1440p at reduced quality.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 65.8 FPS. This is the only resolution where the full Ultra settings remain playable. The data indicates that the GPU has enough headroom at this resolution to handle the highest visual fidelity without dropping below the playable threshold. The margin is modest, roughly 5.8 FPS above the 60 FPS line, so users should expect some variability, but the average stays comfortably in playable territory.

Moving to 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, with an average of 66.2 FPS. Ultra at this resolution drops to 48.5 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS target. Medium also remains playable at 77.1 FPS, but High represents the best balance between visual quality and performance. Low runs at 106.8 FPS, but the database recommends High as the optimal choice for this resolution since it stays above 60 FPS while providing substantially better visuals than Low.

At 3840x2160, the only playable preset is Low, averaging 70.5 FPS. Medium drops to 50.8 FPS, High to 44.3 FPS, and Ultra to 30 FPS, all below the required threshold. This makes 4K a difficult proposition for this combo, requiring a significant sacrifice in visual quality to maintain acceptable frame rates. The data suggests that 4K playable performance is an edge case, not a standard use scenario for these components.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions reveals that the GPU is the dominant constraint at higher settings, while the CPU provides a strong baseline at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rate ranges from 65.8 FPS at Ultra to 144.7 FPS at Low, a 2.2x spread. This wide variation is typical of a GPU-bound scenario at lower resolutions, where the RTX 2060 is the limiting factor. The Ryzen 5 9600X, with its high single-thread performance, is not the bottleneck here.

At 2560x1440, the spread narrows: Low runs at 106.8 FPS, Medium at 77.1 FPS, High at 66.2 FPS, and Ultra at 48.5 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 54.6%, which is more pronounced than the 1080p spread. This confirms that as resolution increases, the GPU workload grows faster than the CPU can compensate, pushing the RTX 2060 closer to its limits. The CPU maintains a stable foundation, but the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth (336.0 GB/s) become the limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. Low averages 70.5 FPS, but Medium drops to 50.8 FPS, a 28% reduction for a single preset step. Ultra plummets to 30 FPS. This steep decline shows that the 6 GB GDDR6 memory and the TU106 chip's compute resources are overwhelmed at 4K. The Ryzen 5 9600X, with its 32 MB L3 cache and Zen 5 architecture, is not the limiting factor; it provides ample headroom for frame generation, but the GPU cannot keep up. The scaling from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra goes from 65.8 FPS to 30 FPS, a 54% loss, confirming that the RTX 2060 is the primary driver of performance degradation as resolution rises.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data provides a full matrix of average FPS for each resolution and settings combination. At 1920x1080, Low runs at 144.7 FPS, Medium at 104.4 FPS, High at 90.4 FPS, and Ultra at 65.8 FPS. This shows a steady, predictable decline as settings increase, with each step from Low to Medium to High to Ultra reducing frame rates by roughly 40, 14, and 25 FPS respectively. The jumps are not linear, indicating that the GPU's shading units and TMUs handle some settings more efficiently than others.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS reads as follows: Low at 106.8, Medium at 77.1, High at 66.2, and Ultra at 48.5. The drop from Medium to High is 14.1%, a smaller step than the drop from High to Ultra, which is 26.7%. This suggests that Ultra settings at 1440p introduce a significant load that the RTX 2060's 1920 shading units cannot handle efficiently, whereas High still remains within the GPU's comfortable range.

At 3840x2160, the averages are Low at 70.5, Medium at 50.8, High at 44.3, and Ultra at 30. The progression shows a 28% drop from Low to Medium, another 12.8% from Medium to High, and a 32.3% drop from High to Ultra. The 4K Ultra result of 30 FPS is exactly at the playable threshold, meaning it is technically the floor for playable, but the database marks it as not playable because the average is below 60 FPS. The data does not report min or max FPS for any of these settings, only averages, so it is not possible to quantify frame pacing or stutter from this set alone.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X sits at the 81st percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, which scores 29,656 and is 0.2% slower, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with a score of 29,868 and a minus 0.5% delta, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT at 29,879 with a minus 0.6% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS at 29,955 with a minus 0.8% delta. These processors would all deliver nearly identical performance in Lockdown Protocol, meaning the game will not see a meaningful difference if any of these CPUs are paired with the RTX 2060. The Ryzen 7 5800XT and the Ryzen 7 7840H are particularly close, both within 0.6% of the 9600X, so a user upgrading or downgrading between them would see no practical FPS change.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 has a percentile of 58% among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580, which scores 15,283 and is exactly 0% delta, the AMD Radeon 680M at 15,270 with a 0.1% delta, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM at 15,199 with a 0.6% delta, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 at 15,171 with a 0.8% delta. This means the RTX 2060 and the GTX 580 are statistically identical in performance, which is surprising given the architectural differences, but the data shows a delta of 0.0%. The Radeon 680M, an integrated GPU, is also within 0.1% of the 2060, which would result in nearly the same frame rates in Lockdown Protocol. The RTX 3050 OEM and RX 7600 are slightly slower, so they would yield a few FPS less at the same settings, but the difference is negligible.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings for 1080p on this CPU and GPU combo?

A: At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset runs at an average of 65.8 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the highest playable setting for this resolution.

Q: Can this combination handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings, which averages 70.5 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra drop to 50.8, 44.3, and 30 FPS respectively, all below the 60 FPS target.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 9600X compare to its nearest CPU rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29,879, which is 0.6% slower than the 9600X’s 29,713 average. This means they will deliver nearly identical performance in this game.

Q: Is the RTX 2060 or the CPU the bottleneck at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the GPU is the primary constraint. The average FPS drops from 106.8 at Low to 66.2 at High, showing the RTX 2060's limits. The CPU has a stronger headroom.

Q: What is the measured FPS at Medium settings at 1440p?

A: The recorded average for 2560x1440 on Medium is 77.1 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold and playable.

Q: Is the RTX 2060 closer to any other GPU in performance?

A: The RTX 2060 has a near tie with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580, which matches its 15,290 score with a 0.0% delta. The RTX 3050 OEM is also 0.6% slower, so they are all within a small margin.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's overall rankings for Lockdown Protocol, this CPU and GPU combination is ranked 2,898 out of 3,714 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle range of all hardware combinations. The percentile ranking indicates that this setup performs better than roughly 22% of all tested combos, meaning it falls behind the majority of systems. This is a modest result, consistent with the RTX 2060's 58th percentile among GPUs and the CPU's 81st percentile among CPUs. The lower ranking is driven by the GPU, which holds back the 9600X's higher-end CPU performance. In practical terms, this combo is positioned well for 1080p gaming but does not have the headroom for high refresh rate 1440p or 4K.

The data shows that the Ryzen 5 9600X is a capable mid-range CPU, but the RTX 2060 is the limiting factor in this pairing. While the CPU can push high frame rates at Low settings, the GPU's inability to maintain 60 FPS at higher presets in 1440p and 4K caps the overall experience. For users focused on 1080p with Ultra settings, this combo is competent. For those who want to play at 1440p or 4K, the results indicate a significant compromise. The ranking of 2,898 out of 3,714 confirms that this is not a top-tier gaming system for this title, but it is not the bottom either, it sits in the lower quarter of tested configurations.