Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

90%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
244 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
116 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
176 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
86 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
115 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
54 FPS
6.7ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 29,713
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 48,477

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 54 71 84 115
1440p QHD 86 112 126 176
1080p Full HD 116 150 174 244

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 150
1920x1080 Low 244
1920x1080 Medium 174
1920x1080 Ultra 116
2560x1440 High 112
2560x1440 Low 176
2560x1440 Medium 126
2560x1440 Ultra 86
3840x2160 High 71
3840x2160 Low 115
3840x2160 Medium 84
3840x2160 Ultra 54

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT delivers a commanding performance in Lockdown Protocol, comfortably exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold across nearly every resolution and preset combination tested. The data indicates this combo is exceptionally well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, while still providing a smooth experience at 4K with adjusted settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is overwhelmingly powerful, with the Low preset achieving an average of 243.5 FPS. Moving up through the presets, Medium delivers 174.3 FPS, High produces 149.8 FPS, and even the demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 115.5 FPS. These figures show that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU combination is never stressed, leaving substantial headroom for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains stellar. The Low preset yields an average of 175.9 FPS, which is still exceptionally high. Medium settings produce 126.3 FPS, and High delivers 112.2 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to an average of 85.6 FPS, but this remains well above the 60 FPS threshold and indicates a fluid experience with maximum visual fidelity. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a predictable average reduction of roughly 25-30% across presets, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario at these resolutions.

The most demanding scenario is 3840x2160 (4K). Here, the Low preset achieves an average of 114.6 FPS, which is remarkable for 4K gaming. Medium settings deliver 83.9 FPS, and High produces 71.4 FPS. However, the Ultra preset at 4K falls below the playable threshold, with an average of 53.8 FPS. This is the only configuration in the dataset that fails to clear 60 FPS, indicating that the absolute maximum settings at 4K are beyond what this hardware can sustain smoothly. The data shows a clear trend: as resolution increases, the gap between presets widens, highlighting the GPU's workload scaling.

The absence of min/max FPS data means the analysis relies solely on average frame rates. The average figures are consistently high, suggesting stable performance rather than erratic spikes. For players prioritizing frame rate consistency, the 1080p and 1440p results provide massive buffers above the playable threshold, ensuring that even intense scenes with multiple players are unlikely to cause noticeable dips.

CPU and GPU Roles

Benchmark results indicate a shifting balance between CPU and GPU influence depending on the resolution. At 1920x1080, the low resolution places a relatively lighter load on the GPU, allowing the Ryzen 5 9600X's strong single-thread performance to become more apparent. The massive frame rates at this resolution (243.5 FPS on Low) suggest that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently, preventing a bottleneck. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p (243.5 down to 115.5 FPS) is significant, showing that while the CPU can handle high frame rates, the GPU's workload still dominates the final output.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced. The frame rates drop across all presets compared to 1080p, but the relative differences remain similar. The transition from 1080p Low (243.5 FPS) to 1440p Low (175.9 FPS) represents a 28% reduction, which is closer to the pixel count increase (1.78x) than a pure CPU limit would suggest. This indicates that at 1440p, the RX 6800 XT is the primary limiter, though the CPU still provides ample support to reach high averages. The Ultra preset at 1440p (85.6 FPS) versus High (112.2 FPS) shows a 24% performance cost for the highest settings, reinforcing the GPU's dominance.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The pixel count quadruples from 1080p, and the frame rates reflect this massive workload increase. The Low preset at 4K (114.6 FPS) is still high, but the gap between Medium (83.9 FPS) and High (71.4 FPS) narrows compared to lower resolutions. The Ultra preset at 4K (53.8 FPS) falls below the playable threshold, demonstrating that the GPU simply cannot maintain 60 FPS with maximum settings at this resolution. The data strongly suggests that at 4K, the CPU's performance is largely irrelevant for frame rate outcomes, as the GPU is fully saturated.

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals that the Ryzen 5 9600X is never the limiting factor in this pairing. Even at the lowest resolution and settings, where CPU load is highest, the system achieves over 240 FPS. This indicates that the CPU has significant headroom, and the RX 6800 XT is the component that determines playability at higher resolutions and settings.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with playable frame rates?*

A: Yes, at 4K the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on the Low (114.6 FPS), Medium (83.9 FPS), and High (71.4 FPS) presets. However, the Ultra preset at 4K falls short, averaging 53.8 FPS, so maximum settings are not playable at this resolution.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 60 FPS experience at 1440p?

A: All four presets at 2560x1440 exceed 60 FPS. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 85.6 FPS, making it the best visual option while still maintaining a comfortable margin above the playable threshold.

Q: How does the 1080p performance compare to 4K performance?

A: The difference is substantial. At 1080p, the Low preset hits 243.5 FPS, while the same preset at 4K drops to 114.6 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1080p (115.5 FPS) is nearly identical to the Low preset at 4K (114.6 FPS), showing the massive GPU workload increase at higher resolutions.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?

A: At 1080p, the CPU's strong performance enables very high frame rates, but the GPU still limits scaling. At 1440p and especially 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, as frame rates scale directly with the GPU workload and the CPU has ample headroom.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS in the dataset is 53.8 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with the Ultra settings preset. This is the only configuration that falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Does the system maintain high frame rates on the Medium preset across all resolutions?

A: Yes. The Medium preset achieves 174.3 FPS at 1080p, 126.3 FPS at 1440p, and 83.9 FPS at 4K. All of these are well above the playable threshold, making Medium a reliable choice for smooth gameplay at any resolution.

The Verdict

The data clearly shows that this PC can run Lockdown Protocol exceptionally well. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on every preset, with the Ultra preset achieving 115.5 FPS on average. This makes it an excellent choice for high-refresh-rate monitors, as even the most demanding settings provide a smooth experience. At 2560x1440, the verdict is equally positive, with all presets including Ultra (85.6 FPS) exceeding the playable threshold. This resolution offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, with maximum settings delivering a fluid experience.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is conditional. The High preset (71.4 FPS) provides a playable and visually impressive experience, making it the recommended choice for 4K. The Medium (83.9 FPS) and Low (114.6 FPS) presets are also viable for higher frame rates. However, the Ultra preset at 4K fails to reach 60 FPS, averaging 53.8 FPS, so players seeking maximum graphical fidelity at 4K will need to accept lower frame rates or reduce settings to High. Overall, the system is a formidable performer, with only the absolute maximum settings at 4K proving to be too demanding.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware would behave similarly. For the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, benchmark results indicate that the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is the closest match, with an average score just 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H and AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT are also near equivalents, with scores 0.5% and 0.6% lower, respectively. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is slightly further behind at 0.8% lower. In gaming terms, these CPUs should produce nearly identical frame rates with the RX 6800 XT, as the differences are within a single percentage point.

For the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile is the closest rival, with an average score 1.5% higher. The Intel Arc A550M is 2.5% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 are 3% lower. These deltas are small enough that gameplay experience would be virtually indistinguishable in Lockdown Protocol. Players with any of these GPUs paired with a comparable CPU should expect similar average FPS figures to those measured here, with the RTX A1000 Mobile potentially offering a marginal edge.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this pairing of the Ryzen 5 9600X and RX 6800 XT ranks 1128 out of 3714 tested combos. This places it in the top 30% of all configurations, which is a strong result given the thousands of possible pairings. The percentile rankings for the individual components support this: the CPU sits in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. The combination of two high-performing components results in a system that is well above average for this game, capable of delivering high frame rates at most settings. The ranking reflects that while there are faster combinations available, this setup offers a substantial level of performance that will satisfy most players, particularly those targeting 1440p or high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming.