Lockdown Protocol

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a formidable combination for Lockdown Protocol, ranking in the 84th percentile of all tested combos for this specific title. With a combo rank of 582 out of 3714 tested configurations, this pairing sits comfortably in the upper echelon of systems, delivering high frame rates across all resolutions and presets. The data indicates that this is not a marginal setup; it is one that consistently pushes well beyond the 60 FPS playable threshold, making it a strong candidate for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1440p and even 4K gaming.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 582 out of 3714 tested combinations places it in the top 15.7% of all systems tested for Lockdown Protocol. This is a strong showing, indicating that the synergy between the Ryzen 5 8400F and the RTX 4070 SUPER is well-balanced for this game's engine. The data shows that this pairing outperforms the vast majority of alternatives, meaning users can expect a smooth, high-performance experience without worrying about significant bottlenecks. The ranking suggests that this configuration is not merely adequate but is positioned for high-fidelity, high-frame-rate gaming.

The CPU's individual performance reinforces this position. The Ryzen 5 8400F achieves an average benchmark score of 25005, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its multi-threaded capabilities are notable, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 and a Passmark multithread score of 24389. The GPU is even more impressive, with an average benchmark score of 43223, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. The RTX 4070 SUPER's Passmark G3D score of 29995 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4627 demonstrate substantial graphical horsepower. Together, these components create a system that is well above average, and the in-game rank confirms that this theoretical performance translates directly into excellent frame rates.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearestRivals data, several other components would deliver a nearly identical experience. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is the closest match, with an average score of 24964, a mere 0.2% difference from the 8400F. This means in practical terms, there is no performance difference between the two for Lockdown Protocol. The Intel Core i7-11850H and Intel Core i7-13620H are also extremely close, with scores of 24935 and 24911, respectively, showing a 0.3% and 0.4% delta. These CPUs would behave almost identically in this game, making them effective substitutes if availability or platform preferences differ.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB is the closest rival, with an average score of 43262, only 0.1% higher than the RTX 4070 SUPER. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile and the standard Quadro M6000 are also within a 0.1% and 0.2% delta, respectively. The data shows that these GPUs would produce nearly the same frame rates. The RTX 4090 Mobile is the furthest rival listed, at a 1% lower score (43667), but this is still a negligible difference in real-world gaming. For a user looking at the benchmark database, these alternatives represent hardware that will land in the same performance bracket, meaning identical settings and frame rates can be expected.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals how the balance of load shifts between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system is clearly CPU-bound at times, with the Low preset achieving 290 FPS. The jump to High (180 FPS) and Ultra (135 FPS) shows the GPU taking on more work as settings increase, but the sheer headroom suggests the CPU is keeping pace easily. The RTX 4070 SUPER is so powerful that at 1080p, the Ryzen 5 8400F is the limiting factor in pushing frame rates even higher, though it still delivers exceptional performance.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to shoulder more of the load. The Low preset drops to 212 FPS, and Ultra falls to 99 FPS. This scaling shows the GPU's rendering load increasing, but the CPU remains capable of feeding it. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant factor. The Low preset delivers 137 FPS, while Ultra drops to 64 FPS. This 73 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K, compared to a 155 FPS difference at 1080p, clearly illustrates that the RTX 4070 SUPER's workload at 4K is the primary constraint. The CPU's role becomes less critical at higher resolutions, as the GPU is fully saturated, making this combo well-suited for 4K where the GPU's capabilities are the deciding factor.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with maximum settings?

A: Yes. The data shows the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 achieves an average of 64 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All settings are marked as playable at this resolution.

Q: How much faster is this combo at 1080p compared to 4K?

A: At the Medium preset, the average frame rate is 206 FPS at 1920x1080, 151 FPS at 2560x1440, and 97 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 109 FPS difference between 1080p and 4K at Medium settings.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 144Hz monitor at 1440p?

A: The High preset at 2560x1440 delivers an average of 132 FPS, which is ideal for a 144Hz display. The Ultra preset at this resolution achieves 99 FPS, which is still smooth but may not fully saturate a 144Hz panel.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 8400F a bottleneck for the RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: The data suggests minimal bottlenecking. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 290 FPS, indicating the CPU is strong. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 64 FPS, showing the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's performance is sufficient to feed the GPU effectively across all tested settings.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 SUPER support the latest DirectX features?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features like ray tracing and mesh shaders. It also supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: How does the combo's performance compare to the 60 FPS threshold at 4K?

A: The lowest average frame rate recorded is 64 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. This is 4 FPS above the playable threshold, confirming that even the most demanding preset is playable.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a comprehensive look at performance across three resolutions and four presets.

At 3840x2160, the system delivers the following averages:

• Ultra: 64 FPS
• High: 85 FPS
• Medium: 97 FPS (min 83, max 112)
• Low: 137 FPS

At 2560x1440, the averages are:

• Ultra: 99 FPS
• High: 132 FPS
• Medium: 151 FPS (min 128, max 173)
• Low: 212 FPS

At 1920x1080, the averages are:

• Ultra: 135 FPS
• High: 180 FPS
• Medium: 206 FPS (min 175, max 237)
• Low: 290 FPS

The Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values. At 4K, the minimum is 83 FPS and maximum is 112 FPS, showing a consistent frame time with a 29 FPS variance. At 1440p, the minimum is 128 FPS and maximum is 173 FPS, a 45 FPS range. At 1080p, the minimum is 175 FPS and maximum is 237 FPS, a 62 FPS range. This data suggests that frame pacing is stable, with the variance scaling proportionally with the overall frame rate.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is the Ultra preset across the board.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 64 FPS. This is the highest visual quality available while remaining above the playable threshold, making it the recommended setting for 4K displays.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 99 FPS. This provides a substantial margin above 60 FPS, offering both high fidelity and smooth gameplay on high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 135 FPS. This is ideal for competitive play on 144Hz or 165Hz monitors, delivering max settings with excellent frame rates. The data confirms that all presets are playable at every resolution, but Ultra is the best choice for maximum visual quality without sacrificing playability.