Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

58%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
160 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
74 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
117 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
54 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
76 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
35 FPS
10.1ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 25,005
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 15,171

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 47 54 76
1440p QHD 54 73 83 117
1080p Full HD 74 99 113 160

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 99
1920x1080 Low 160
1920x1080 Medium 113
1920x1080 Ultra 74
2560x1440 High 73
2560x1440 Low 117
2560x1440 Medium 83
2560x1440 Ultra 54
3840x2160 High 47
3840x2160 Low 76
3840x2160 Medium 54
3840x2160 Ultra 35

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 delivers a broad range of performance in Lockdown Protocol, scaling predictably from a comfortable 1080p experience to a more constrained 4K showing. The measured data indicates this combination is well-suited for high-refresh-rate play at 1440p and below, while 4K requires a significant compromise in visual fidelity to maintain smooth gameplay.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination demonstrates its strongest performance. The Low preset produces an average of 160 FPS, which is the highest average recorded across all tested settings and resolutions. Medium yields an average of 113 FPS, with a minimum of 96 FPS and a maximum of 130 FPS, showing consistent frame delivery. The High preset remains highly playable with an average of 99 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset at 1080p stays well above the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 74 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains robust but shows the expected cost of additional pixels. The Low preset averages 117 FPS, still a very high refresh rate figure. Medium averages 83 FPS, with a minimum of 71 FPS and a maximum of 96 FPS, indicating that even the frame dips stay above the playable threshold. High averages 73 FPS, which is sufficient for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset drops to an average of 54 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS playable mark and signaling that this setting is not viable at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the demands of 4K become clearly evident. The Low preset is the only playable option, averaging 76 FPS. Medium averages 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS, placing it right at the edge of playability but below the average threshold. High drops to 47 FPS, and Ultra falls to 35 FPS, making both unplayable for smooth action. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is substantial, a 41 FPS difference, underscoring the GPU's limits at this resolution.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data provides a clear directive for optimal settings that maintain an average of at least 60 FPS.

For 1920x1080, the best playable setting is Ultra, which achieves an average of 74 FPS. This allows users to experience the full graphical feature set while still maintaining a frame rate that comfortably exceeds the playable threshold.

For 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, with an average of 73 FPS. This provides a strong balance between visual quality and performance, keeping the frame rate above 60 FPS while offering a significant upgrade over Medium.

For 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Low, which reaches an average of 76 FPS. This is the only setting at this resolution that clears the 60 FPS hurdle. While visual fidelity is reduced, the frame rate is more than adequate for gameplay.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in hardware responsibilities as resolution increases. At 1080p, the high average frame rates, particularly the 160 FPS on Low, suggest that the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is capable of feeding frames to the Radeon RX 7600 without becoming a limiting factor. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 86 FPS difference, which points to the GPU being the primary driver of performance changes when settings are adjusted.

At 1440p, the performance scaling between presets remains consistent with a GPU-bound workload. The drop from Low (117 FPS) to Ultra (54 FPS) is a 63 FPS reduction. The fact that the average frame rate at High remains above 60 FPS indicates that the GPU still has enough headroom to handle the increased pixel count, but the CPU is no longer as dominant a factor as it is at 1080p.

The data at 4K tells a different story. The performance gap between Low (76 FPS) and Ultra (35 FPS) is a massive 41 FPS, and even Medium averages only 54 FPS. This pattern strongly indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the primary bottleneck at this resolution. The GPU's rendering capabilities are being saturated by the 3840x2160 pixel count, and the CPU's role becomes less significant. The scaling between 1080p and 4K on the Low preset, from 160 FPS to 76 FPS, further confirms this; the 84 FPS drop is far more attributable to GPU pixel throughput than CPU limitations.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on aggregate benchmark scores, several other CPUs and GPUs would produce similar performance in this system. The nearest rival to the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, which has an average score 0.2% higher. This indicates nearly identical processing capability. The Intel Core i7-11850H and Intel Core i7-13620H are also close, with scores 0.3% and 0.4% higher, respectively. The AMD EPYC 9474F, while a server part, shows a score 0.4% lower, suggesting similar multi-threaded performance in this context.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7600's closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, which has an average score 0.2% higher, indicating near-parity in overall graphics performance. The AMD Radeon 680M is a notable alternative, with a score 0.7% higher, though it is an integrated graphics solution. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti are also listed as rivals, with scores 0.6% and 0.7% higher, respectively, though these are older architectures. In practice, a build with the Ryzen 5 7500F and an RTX 3050 OEM would behave very similarly to the tested configuration.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 1920x1080 with maximum settings?

A: Yes. The benchmark data shows the Ultra preset at 1920x1080 achieves an average of 74 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: The High preset is the most demanding setting that stays playable at 1440p, with an average of 73 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 54 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?

A: Viability is limited. The only playable setting at 3840x2160 is Low, which averages 76 FPS. Medium averages 54 FPS, and High and Ultra are below 50 FPS.

Q: How much of a performance difference is there between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: The data shows a substantial 86 FPS gap, with Low averaging 160 FPS and Ultra averaging 74 FPS.

Q: Which component is more important at 4K resolution?

A: The data indicates the AMD Radeon RX 7600 GPU is the primary bottleneck at 3840x2160. The significant frame rate drop across presets at this resolution, compared to 1080p, points to GPU rendering limits.

Q: How does this CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has an average benchmark score 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, indicating they are effectively equivalent in performance.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination is ranked 2577 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the database. The percentile data for the individual components supports this ranking: the CPU sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. The GPU's lower relative standing likely pulls the overall combo rank down, as the game's performance at higher resolutions and settings is heavily dependent on graphics processing power. The rank indicates that while this is a capable setup for mainstream gaming, a significant portion of other tested configurations offer higher average performance in this specific title.

The Verdict

The data confirms that this PC is fully capable of running Lockdown Protocol, but the experience varies significantly by resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system excels, with all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—achieving average frame rates above the playable 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 74 FPS is a strong result. At 2560x1440, the system remains highly capable, with the High preset at 73 FPS being the optimal choice for visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. However, the Ultra preset falls short of the 60 FPS mark.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more cautious. The system can run the game, but only on the Low preset, which averages 76 FPS. This allows for playable performance, but users seeking higher visual quality at 4K would need to consider more powerful hardware. Overall, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination is a solid choice for high-refresh-rate 1080p and smooth 1440p gaming in Lockdown Protocol, with 4K being a viable option only with significant graphical compromises.