Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 39 | 50 | 58 | 78 |
| 1440p QHD | 59 | 76 | 86 | 122 |
| 1080p Full HD | 75 | 106 | 118 | 164 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT delivers a performance profile that scales predictably across resolutions and presets in Lockdown Protocol. The measured data shows a system capable of smooth gameplay at mainstream resolutions, with clear limitations at 4K Ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the combination is overwhelmingly strong, while 2560x1440 remains highly playable, and 3840x2160 requires setting expectations to lower presets.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark data reveals a consistent hierarchy across all three resolutions, with frame rates scaling down as pixel count and graphical load increase. Starting at 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best absolute performance. At Low settings, the average FPS is 163.6, which is exceptionally high and indicates the CPU-GPU pair is far from strained. Moving to Medium settings drops the average to 117.6 FPS, still a massive margin above the 60 FPS playability threshold. High settings at 1080p produce an average of 106.1 FPS, showing that the jump from Medium to High costs roughly 11.5 FPS. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still manages an average of 74.6 FPS, which is comfortably above the playability threshold but represents a significant 45% reduction from the Low preset figure.
At 2560x1440, the performance curve steepens. Low settings yield an average of 121.9 FPS, which is still excellent for competitive play. Medium settings drop to 86.4 FPS, a 29% decrease from Low. High settings produce 76 FPS, keeping the experience fluid. Ultra settings at 1440p bring the average down to 59 FPS, which sits just one frame below the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is a critical finding: the system is almost capable of 1440p Ultra but falls short by a single frame on average, making High the sensible ceiling for this resolution.
The 3840x2160 results illustrate a more pronounced GPU bottleneck. Low settings return an average of 77.9 FPS, which is playable but far from the towering numbers seen at lower resolutions. Medium settings drop to 57.7 FPS, below the playability threshold. High settings average 50.2 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39.2 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 4K is 38.7 FPS, or roughly 50%, indicating that the RX 6650 XT’s 8 GB frame buffer and 128-bit memory bus are overwhelmed by the pixel count and texture detail at this resolution. No min or max FPS values were recorded in the data, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates, which are sufficient to establish the clear tiering.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU each have well-defined performance neighborhoods based on aggregate benchmark scores. The Ryzen 5 7600X sits at the 79th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 27,636. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, both with average scores of 27,578, placing them a mere 0.2% behind. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27,712, which is 0.3% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27,535, 0.4% behind. In practical terms, swapping the 7600X for any of these chips would yield nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Lockdown Protocol, with frame rate differences likely imperceptible in the measured scenarios.
On the GPU side, the Radeon RX 6650 XT holds the 65th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 19,765. Its nearest rivals are less modern but numerically close: the NVIDIA Tesla K40m scores 19,885 (0.6% ahead), the AMD FirePro D300 scores 19,637 (0.7% behind), the AMD FirePro W7000 scores 19,905 (0.7% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 scores 19,602 (0.8% behind). These are workstation-class cards, not gaming equivalents, so their similar aggregate scores do not translate to comparable gaming behavior in Lockdown Protocol; the RX 6650 XT’s architecture and driver support are better suited to DirectX 12 workloads. However, the data implies that any consumer GPU with a benchmark score near 19,765 would produce similar average frame rates at the same settings, assuming equal driver optimization.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?*
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 74.6, which exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold by a margin of 14.6 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset for 2560x1440?
A: High settings are the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS, with an average of 76 FPS. Ultra settings average 59 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: Only at Low settings, where the average FPS is 77.9. Medium settings drop to 57.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold, and High or Ultra are not recommended based on the data.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of benchmark scores?
A: The Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27,636 on average. The closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, scores 27,578, which is 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i5-12600K matches that same score, also 0.2% lower.
Q: What is the performance gap between 1080p and 1440p at Medium settings?
A: At 1080p Medium, the average FPS is 117.6. At 1440p Medium, it drops to 86.4. This represents a 26.5% reduction in frame rate when moving up one resolution tier.
Q: Does the GPU hold back the CPU at any resolution?
A: At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 39.2, which is far below the CPU’s potential. The data suggests a GPU bottleneck at 4K, while at 1080p Low (163.6 FPS) and 1440p Low (121.9 FPS), the CPU is likely the limiting factor given the very high frame rates.
The Verdict
Based on the measured data, this PC can run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS or above across most configurations. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the threshold, with Ultra averaging 74.6 FPS. This is the sweet spot for the combination, allowing full graphical fidelity without compromise. At 2560x1440, the verdict is positive but requires a preset choice: High settings average 76 FPS and are fully playable, while Ultra dips to 59 FPS, missing the 60 FPS mark by one frame. For players with a 1440p monitor, High is the recommended ceiling. At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, averaging 77.9 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below the threshold, with averages of 57.7, 50.2, and 39.2 FPS respectively. The verdict is clear: this is a capable 1080p and 1440p machine for Lockdown Protocol, but 4K gaming is limited to the lowest preset.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals which component dominates in different scenarios. At 1920x1080, the frame rates range from 74.6 (Ultra) to 163.6 (Low), a span of 89 FPS. The fact that Low settings produce over 160 FPS indicates the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far more frames than the GPU can render at higher settings, but the GPU is still the primary limiter once settings increase. At 2560x1440, the range is from 59 (Ultra) to 121.9 (Low), a span of 62.9 FPS. The drop from 1080p Low (163.6) to 1440p Low (121.9) is a 25.5% reduction, which is largely attributable to the GPU’s pixel throughput limits. The CPU’s role is less visible here because the GPU is already working harder.
At 3840x2160, the GPU’s dominance becomes unmistakable. The difference between Low (77.9 FPS) and Ultra (39.2 FPS) is 38.7 FPS, and even Low at 4K is slower than Ultra at 1080p. This pattern indicates that the RX 6650 XT is the bottleneck at 4K, as the Ryzen 5 7600X’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,060 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,965) is not the limiting factor. Conversely, at 1080p Low, the CPU is likely the constraint, as the GPU would be capable of rendering even more frames if the CPU could issue draw calls faster. The data suggests that for this game, the GPU matters more at higher resolutions and presets, while the CPU is more relevant at low settings and 1080p.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 74.6 FPS. This is the recommended setting for full visual quality without sacrificing playability. At 2560x1440, the best settings are High, averaging 76 FPS. Choosing Ultra would drop the average to 59 FPS, which is below the threshold, so High represents the optimal balance. At 3840x2160, the only playable preset is Low, with an average of 77.9 FPS. Medium falls short at 57.7 FPS, making Low the sole viable option for 4K. These recommendations are based strictly on the measured averages and the 60 FPS playability threshold.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT ranks 2,392 out of 3,714 total combinations. This places it in the 35.6th percentile of all tested combos, meaning roughly 64% of tested systems perform better. The rank reflects the GPU’s mid-range positioning (65th percentile among all GPUs) and the CPU’s upper-mid-range standing (79th percentile among all CPUs). The combination is not a top-tier performer, but it is far from the bottom, and the measured FPS data confirms that it handles Lockdown Protocol well at 1080p and 1440p. The ranking suggests that while there are many faster systems, this one offers a solid baseline for the game’s requirements at mainstream resolutions.