Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 17 | 22 | 26 | 36 |
| 1440p QHD | 26 | 35 | 40 | 56 |
| 1080p Full HD | 35 | 47 | 54 | 76 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The pairing of an AMD Ryzen 5 7600 with an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is an unbalanced combination for Lockdown Protocol, a first-person shooter released in March 2024. The database measurements show that the six-core Zen 4 processor sits in the 78th percentile of all tracked CPUs, while the Turing-based GTX 1650 occupies only the 40th percentile of GPUs. That asymmetry defines the experience: the CPU has plenty of headroom, but the graphics card caps frame rates at every resolution. Across twelve measured configurations, only one, 1920x1080 at Low settings, clears the 60 FPS playability threshold.
FAQ
Q: Can the Ryzen 5 7600 + GTX 1650 run Lockdown Protocol at 1080p?
A: Yes, but only at Low settings, where the recorded average is 76 FPS. Medium settings drop to 54 FPS average (46 minimum, 62 maximum) and High reaches just 47 FPS, both below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Is 1440p playable?
A: No. The best result at 2560x1440 is 56 FPS on the Low preset, which falls short of the threshold. Medium averages 40 FPS with a minimum of 34, High 35 FPS, and Ultra 26 FPS.
Q: Can this setup handle 4K?
A: Not for smooth play. At 3840x2160 the averages range from 17 FPS on Ultra to 36 FPS on Low, and the Medium preset's frame range spans 22 to 29 FPS. None of these are playable by the database standard.
Q: Which component is the bottleneck?
A: The GPU. The Ryzen 5 7600 ranks in the 78th percentile versus all CPUs, while the GTX 1650 sits in the 40th percentile among GPUs. Frame rates fall sharply as resolution climbs, a signature of graphics-bound scaling rather than CPU limitation.
Q: How does this combination rank against other tested pairings?
A: It ranks 3580 out of 3714 tested combinations in this game, placing it near the bottom of the recorded field.
Q: What CPU benchmark scores back the "no CPU bottleneck" claim?
A: The Ryzen 5 7600 posts a single-thread score of 999 in the database's 3DMark CPU test, 2521 in Geekbench single-core, and 12735 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with a PassMark multithread rating of 27058.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling data makes the division of labor clear. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at Low settings cuts the average from 76 FPS to 56 FPS, and stepping up to 3840x2160 on the same preset drops it further to 36 FPS. That is a resolution-driven collapse, and resolution load falls almost entirely on the GPU. When resolution quadruples the pixel count and frame rates fall by roughly half and then half again, the graphics card is the limiting factor.
Preset scaling tells the same story. At 1080p, going from Low to Medium costs 22 FPS (76 to 54), and Medium to High costs another 7 FPS (54 to 47). These are graphics-side settings affecting texture detail, shadows, and effects, and the GTX 1650's 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus with 128.1 GB/s of bandwidth is quickly saturated. The card's PassMark G3D score of 7880 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 305 describe a GPU with limited render throughput for a 2024 title.
The Ryzen 5 7600, by contrast, is never the constraint in this dataset. Its single-thread results (999 in the database's 3DMark thread test, 1852 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 3910 in PassMark single-thread) are strong, and its multi-thread scaling is nearly linear: 3686 at 4 threads, 5508 at 8 threads, 6503 at maximum threads in the 3DMark CPU suite. An FPS title like Lockdown Protocol leans heavily on one strong core, and this CPU provides that. In practical terms, upgrading the GPU would raise frame rates at every resolution; upgrading the CPU would change almost nothing.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For equivalent CPU behavior, the database's nearest rivals for the Ryzen 5 7600 are clustered within a fraction of a percent. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX averages 26274 against the 7600's 26324 composite, a gap of 0.2 percent. The Intel Core i9-11900KF averages 26212 (0.4 percent behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U averages 26187 (0.5 percent behind), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS is the only rival slightly ahead at 26402, 0.3 percent in front. Any of these processors would deliver effectively identical Lockdown Protocol performance when paired with the same class of GPU, because the game is not CPU-starved on this hardware tier.
On the graphics side, the GTX 1650's composite score of 7472 is matched closely by the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7447, 0.3 percent behind), Intel UHD Graphics 750 (7441, 0.4 percent behind), the AMD Radeon R7 350 (7425, 0.6 percent behind), and the Intel Arc A310 (7550, 1 percent ahead). A build using any of these GPUs would be expected to produce very similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, since the game's measured performance here is bound by graphics throughput. The Arc A310 being the only rival slightly ahead suggests it would trade places with the GTX 1650 depending on the scene, but the deltas are small relative to the gap between playable and unplayable settings.
The Verdict
This PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but only in one measured configuration. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average frame rate is 76 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold. Every other combination in the dataset fails: 1080p Medium averages 54 FPS, and both 1440p and 4K return empty playability lists at all presets, with the best 1440p result being 56 FPS on Low and the best 4K result being 36 FPS on Low.
The verdict for a competitive FPS is therefore restrictive. The genre rewards high and stable frame rates, and only the Low preset at 1080p delivers that. Players who insist on visual quality at Medium or higher will need to accept sub-60 averages and, based on the recorded Medium frame ranges, dips into the mid-40s at 1080p and mid-30s at 1440p. The GTX 1650 is an end-of-life card with a 2.984 TFLOPS FP32 peak, and that ceiling is what the measurements reflect.
How This Combo Ranks
Out of 3714 hardware combinations tested in Lockdown Protocol, this pairing ranks 3580. That places it in the bottom few percent of the recorded field for this specific game, despite the CPU being a strong performer in isolation. The ranking is a function of pairing: a 78th-percentile CPU cannot compensate for a 40th-percentile GPU in a title that scales this heavily with graphics throughput.
The rank also contextualizes the upgrade path. Because the CPU side of the combination is near rivals like the Core i9-11900KF and Ryzen 9 6900HX, most of the rank deficit is attributable to the GTX 1650. A GPU substitution from a higher percentile would be expected to lift this combination many places in the game's ranking, whereas a CPU change alone would leave the measured frame rates essentially untouched.
Best Settings per Resolution
Based on the recorded averages and the 60 FPS threshold:
- 1920x1080: Low is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 76 FPS. Medium (54 FPS) and above do not qualify.
- 2560x1440: No preset qualifies. Low at 56 FPS is the closest but falls 4 FPS short of the threshold.
- 3840x2160: No preset qualifies. Low at 36 FPS is the best available and is far below playable.
The practical takeaway is that 1080p Low is the single usable configuration for this hardware, and even a modest reduction in render load elsewhere in the game's options would be needed to make 1440p viable.
Measured FPS Breakdown
All figures below are recorded database measurements for the Ryzen 5 7600 + GTX 1650 pairing in Lockdown Protocol.
1920x1080:
- Low: 76 FPS average
- Medium: 54 FPS average (46 minimum, 62 maximum)
- High: 47 FPS average
- Ultra: 35 FPS average
2560x1440:
- Low: 56 FPS average
- Medium: 40 FPS average (34 minimum, 46 maximum)
- High: 35 FPS average
- Ultra: 26 FPS average
3840x2160:
- Low: 36 FPS average
- Medium: 26 FPS average (22 minimum, 29 maximum)
- High: 22 FPS average
- Ultra: 17 FPS average
The pattern across the table is consistent and steep. Each resolution step roughly halves the frame rate at any given preset, and each preset step costs between 5 and 22 FPS depending on resolution. The Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum values, and those ranges (16 FPS wide at 1080p and 1440p, 7 FPS wide at 4K) indicate noticeable frame variability rather than locked, stable output. At 4K Ultra, the 17 FPS average represents slide-show territory for a fast-paced shooter. The data is unambiguous: the GTX 1650 determines the experience, the Ryzen 5 7600 is largely a spectator, and 1080p Low at 76 FPS is the one configuration where this pairing plays Lockdown Protocol as intended.