Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

62%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
175 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
81 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
128 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
60 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
83 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
39 FPS
9.2ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 26,324
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 16,014

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 51 59 83
1440p QHD 60 80 91 128
1080p Full HD 81 109 124 175

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 109
1920x1080 Low 175
1920x1080 Medium 124
1920x1080 Ultra 81
2560x1440 High 80
2560x1440 Low 128
2560x1440 Medium 91
2560x1440 Ultra 60
3840x2160 High 51
3840x2160 Low 83
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 Ultra 39

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 presents a balanced mid-range configuration for Lockdown Protocol, a 2024-released FPS title. Measured benchmark data shows this combo delivers playable frame rates across all tested resolutions, though the experience varies significantly by settings. At 4K, the system is limited to Low presets for a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold, while 1440p and 1080p allow for maximum quality. The CPU holds a strong position in the market, sitting in the 78th percentile of all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 59th percentile, indicating a system where the graphics card is likely the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum playable setting at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset stays above the 60 FPS playable threshold, averaging 83 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 59 FPS average with a 50 FPS minimum, and High averages 51 FPS, making both technically below the target.

Q: Can this combo handle Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: Yes, at 2560x1440 the Ultra preset averages exactly 60 FPS, which meets the playable threshold. This is the most demanding setting that clears the bar at this resolution, while High averages 80 FPS and Medium averages 91 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score of 26324. Its closest competitor, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, scores 26274, a mere 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i9-11900KF is 0.4% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS trails by 0.3%, indicating near-identical performance among these four processors.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to other graphics cards?

A: The Radeon RX 9060 sits in the 59th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 16014. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, scores 16129, which is 0.7% higher, placing them in the same performance tier.

Q: What frame rates does the system achieve at 1080p with High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with the High preset, the combo averages 109 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold and provides significant headroom for competitive play, with Low averaging 175 FPS and Ultra averaging 81 FPS.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested system configurations?

A: This CPU-GPU combination ranks 2194th out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the database's tested configurations.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals a clear shift in component responsibility as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 175 FPS on Low settings and 124 FPS on Medium, suggesting that the CPU is feeding frames efficiently while the GPU handles the load with room to spare. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a drop from 175 FPS to 81 FPS, a 54% reduction that points to the GPU becoming the limiting factor as graphical demands increase. The Ryzen 5 7600's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 999 score in 3DMark single-thread tests and 1852 in Cinebench R23 single-core, ensures that it is not holding back frame delivery at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rate curve compresses. Low settings yield 128 FPS, Medium drops to 91 FPS, and Ultra lands at exactly 60 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 53%, similar to 1080p, but the absolute values are lower, indicating the GPU is working harder. The RX 9060's 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 throughput become more relevant here, as the increased pixel count demands more from the graphics pipeline. The CPU's role diminishes relatively, though its 12 threads and 32 MB shared L3 cache still prevent any starvation at the 60 FPS floor.

At 3840x2160, the GPU dominates the performance equation. The system manages 83 FPS on Low, 59 FPS on Medium, and only 39 FPS on Ultra. This steep drop-off suggests the RX 9060's 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus is strained at 4K resolutions. The CPU's capability is largely irrelevant here, as the GPU's 1792 shading units and 64 ROPs are simply not enough to maintain high preset quality at this resolution. The data indicates that at 4K, the RX 9060 is the definitive bottleneck, while at 1080p, the CPU still has sufficient headroom to push higher frame rates if the GPU allowed it.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the only preset that maintains a playable average is Low, delivering 83 FPS. The Medium preset falls just below the threshold at 59 FPS average with a 50 FPS minimum, which would cause noticeable stutter in fast-paced FPS gameplay. High drops to 51 FPS and Ultra to 39 FPS, both unacceptable for consistent play. For 4K users, Low settings are the practical choice, offering a 23 FPS margin above the 60 FPS target that accommodates scene complexity spikes.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages exactly 60 FPS, making it the best playable option. This provides the highest visual quality while still meeting the threshold, with High at 80 FPS and Medium at 91 FPS offering more headroom if frame pacing becomes an issue. The 60 FPS average at Ultra is tight, but the data shows no minimum FPS recorded for this setting, suggesting the frame time variance is acceptable. For players who prioritize smoothness over fidelity, High at 80 FPS is a safer bet, but Ultra is technically playable.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 81 FPS, which is the most demanding setting that clears the 60 FPS bar with a substantial 21 FPS margin. This is the sweet spot for the combo, offering maximum visual quality without compromising playability. Low settings reach 175 FPS, Medium 124 FPS, and High 109 FPS, but Ultra at 81 FPS provides the best balance of image quality and performance for most players. The 106 FPS minimum on Medium and the overall consistency suggest the system handles 1080p Ultra without major dips.

The Verdict

This system can run Lockdown Protocol, but the experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution. At 1920x1080, the verdict is unequivocal: all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with Ultra averaging 81 FPS. This is the recommended target for the best visual experience. At 2560x1440, all presets also clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra hitting exactly 60 FPS average. This makes 1440p a viable option for users with high-refresh monitors, though the Ultra margin is minimal. At 3840x2160, only Low is playable at 83 FPS, while Medium at 59 FPS and High at 51 FPS fall short. For 4K users, the system is serviceable but requires significant settings compromises.

The verdictByResolution data confirms that playable settings include Low, Medium, High, and Ultra at both 1080p and 1440p. At 4K, only Low is listed as playable. The best setting at 1080p is Ultra with 81 FPS, at 1440p it is Ultra with 60 FPS, and at 4K it is Low with 83 FPS. This indicates the system is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but 4K is only viable with reduced graphical fidelity. The combo's ranking of 2194 out of 3714 suggests it is a mid-pack performer, capable of handling mainstream resolutions but not pushing the envelope at 4K.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals in benchmark scores are nearly indistinguishable from the Ryzen 5 7600. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX scores 26274, just 0.2% lower, making it a direct performance equivalent in synthetic tests. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 26402, 0.3% higher, and the Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26212, 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U rounds out the group at 26187, 0.5% lower. These four processors form a tight cluster around the 26,200-26,400 score range, meaning any of them would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, assuming the rest of the system is unchanged.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the closest rival with a score of 16129, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 9060's 16014. This makes the RTX 3060 Ti a near-exact performance match, though the RX 9060 has a newer architecture. The AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862, 1% lower, while the AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15852, also 1% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 trails at 15679, 2.1% lower. These alternatives suggest that swapping the RX 9060 for an RTX 3060 Ti would yield virtually identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, while the RX 7700 would be a slightly slower option.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 2194th out of 3714 tested configurations in the database for Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the 59th percentile of all tested combos, meaning roughly 59% of configurations perform better and 41% perform worse. Given that the CPU ranks in the 78th percentile among all processors and the GPU in the 59th percentile, the overall ranking is dragged down by the graphics card. The data shows that the system is more capable than its raw ranking suggests at lower resolutions, where the CPU's strength comes into play, but at 4K, the GPU's limitations cap the experience.

The ranking reflects the balance of the combo: a strong CPU paired with a mid-tier GPU. At 1080p, this combination outperforms what the 59th percentile GPU ranking might imply, achieving 81 FPS on Ultra. At 4K, the system falls to the 39-83 FPS range depending on settings, which aligns with its lower GPU percentile. For players targeting 1080p or 1440p, this ranking undersells the practical experience. For 4K enthusiasts, the ranking accurately reflects the hardware's constraints. The combo's position at 2194 suggests it sits in the upper-middle tier of tested systems, capable of smooth gameplay at mainstream resolutions but not competitive with high-end configurations at 4K.