Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 62 | 82 | 94 | 133 |
| 1440p QHD | 96 | 127 | 146 | 206 |
| 1080p Full HD | 130 | 174 | 199 | 280 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT delivers a commanding performance profile in Lockdown Protocol, clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold at every preset across all three tested resolutions. The data indicates a system with substantial headroom, allowing users to prioritize visual fidelity without compromising frame rate targets.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160 (4K), the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which posts an average of 62 FPS. This is a narrow margin above the 60 FPS threshold, but it is sufficient. The High preset averages 82 FPS, Medium achieves 94 FPS, and Low reaches 133 FPS, illustrating the scaling headroom available at 4K.
For 2560x1440 (1440p), the top preset is again Ultra, delivering a robust 96 FPS average. This represents a substantial cushion over the playability threshold. The High preset averages 127 FPS, Medium hits 146 FPS, and Low reaches 206 FPS.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), the Ultra preset provides an average of 130 FPS, which is the highest framerate ceiling for a maximum-quality setting across all resolutions. High averages 174 FPS, Medium reaches 199 FPS, and Low peaks at 280 FPS. In every scenario, the Ultra preset is not only playable but also leaves significant performance in reserve.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear distribution of workload between the Ryzen 5 7600 and the RX 7900 XT. The CPU’s six Zen 4 cores and 12 threads, with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, demonstrate strong single-thread capability, as reflected in its 3DMark single-thread score of 999. This is critical for a fast-paced FPS where frame pacing and input responsiveness matter.
At 1920x1080, the GPU is less stressed, and the framerates become more dependent on the CPU’s ability to feed the graphics pipeline. The jump from Low (280 FPS) to Ultra (130 FPS) shows a 54% reduction in average FPS (280 to 130), indicating that while the GPU still has a role, the CPU’s headroom is the limiting factor at these high framerates. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6499 and the multi-threaded PassMark score of 27058 suggest the processor can handle the game's logic and draw call generation without becoming a bottleneck at lower resolutions.
As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take a more prominent role. The average FPS at Ultra drops to 96, a 26% decrease from the 1080p Ultra result (130 to 96). This aligns with the GPU’s 800.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which are increasingly taxed by the higher pixel count.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the dominant component. The Ultra preset average falls to 62 FPS, a 35% drop from the 1440p result, showcasing the exponential cost of 4K rendering. The RX 7900 XT’s 20 GB of GDDR6 memory and 320-bit bus are essential here, as the VRAM demands and memory bandwidth requirements scale dramatically. The data shows that while the Ryzen 5 7600 is a capable partner, the RX 7900 XT is the primary driver of performance at 4K, with the CPU’s influence diminishing as resolution rises.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest graphical preset that maintains 60 FPS at 4K with this combo?
A: The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 62 FPS, which is the most demanding setting that remains playable. The High preset is more comfortable at 82 FPS if a higher margin is desired.
Q: How does the performance at 1440p Ultra compare to 1080p Ultra?
A: At 2560x1440 Ultra, the average FPS is 96, which is 26% lower than the 130 FPS average at 1920x1080 Ultra. This indicates a predictable performance cost as pixel count increases.
Q: Is there a significant framerate difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?
A: Yes, the Low preset at 1920x1080 averages 280 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 130 FPS. This is a 54% reduction in average framerate when moving from the lowest to the highest quality settings.
Q: Which component is more important for achieving high framerates at 4K?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary factor. The average FPS at 4K Ultra is 62, which is a 35% drop from the 1440p Ultra result of 96. This scaling pattern shows the GPU’s rendering workload is the main constraint at 4K, with the CPU’s impact diminishing.
Q: Does this system provide a smooth experience at 1440p with all settings maxed out?
A: Yes, the Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 96 FPS, well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Minimum FPS recorded for the Medium preset at this resolution is 124 FPS, suggesting that even in demanding scenes, the system maintains high framerates.
Q: What is the performance headroom like at 1080p for high-refresh-rate monitors?
A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 130 FPS, and the Low preset reaches 280 FPS. This indicates the combo has significant headroom for 144Hz displays, with the High preset at 174 FPS being a strong choice for a balance of quality and speed.
The Verdict
The benchmark data unequivocally confirms that this PC configuration can run Lockdown Protocol with ease. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with the highest being Ultra at 62 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra is comfortably playable at 96 FPS. At 1920x1080, Ultra delivers 130 FPS, and Low reaches 280 FPS.
This system does not merely meet the 60 FPS threshold; it substantially exceeds it in most configurations. The weakest result, 4K Ultra at 62 FPS, is still above the playable line, while 1440p and 1080p offer a wide margin for high-refresh-rate gaming. The data suggests that for competitive play, the 1080p Low preset with 280 FPS is an option for maximum fluidity, while for a visual experience, 1440p Ultra at 96 FPS strikes an excellent balance. The RX 7900 XT’s 20 GB VRAM and high bandwidth ensure that even at 4K, the system does not appear to be memory-constrained, and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance prevents it from being a significant bottleneck at lower resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
3840x2160 (4K)
- Low: Average 133 FPS
- Medium: Average 94 FPS, Minimum 80 FPS, Maximum 108 FPS
- High: Average 82 FPS
- Ultra: Average 62 FPS
2560x1440 (1440p)
- Low: Average 206 FPS
- Medium: Average 146 FPS, Minimum 124 FPS, Maximum 168 FPS
- High: Average 127 FPS
- Ultra: Average 96 FPS
1920x1080 (1080p)
- Low: Average 280 FPS
- Medium: Average 199 FPS, Minimum 169 FPS, Maximum 229 FPS
- High: Average 174 FPS
- Ultra: Average 130 FPS
The Medium preset at each resolution provides the only recorded minimum and maximum FPS data, showing a consistent range. The Minimum FPS at 4K Medium is 80 FPS, at 1440p Medium is 124 FPS, and at 1080p Medium is 169 FPS. These minimums are all well above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that even during demanding sequences, the system maintains high performance.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this CPU-GPU pairing ranks 685th out of 3714 total combos. This places it in the top 18.5% of all tested systems, indicating a strong overall standing.
The Ryzen 5 7600’s average benchmark score of 26324 puts it in the 78th percentile among all CPUs, with its nearest rivals being the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (score 26274, delta 0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (score 26402, delta -0.3%), the Intel Core i9-11900KF (score 26212, delta 0.4%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (score 26187, delta 0.5%). This shows the processor is competitive with a wide range of both mobile and desktop chips.
The RX 7900 XT’s average benchmark score of 13745 places it in the 55th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 660M (score 13812, delta -0.5%), the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (score 13821, delta -0.5%), the AMD Radeon RX 570X (score 13871, delta -0.9%), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (score 13543, delta 1.5%). The percentile ranking might seem modest, but the measured FPS data in Lockdown Protocol shows the GPU performs exceptionally well in this specific title, suggesting the game’s optimization favors its architecture. The combination’s rank of 685 out of 3714 reflects a high-performing system capable of delivering a top-tier gaming experience.